Sure, it's a reported issue. Such have been other instances. But people may continue to be confused as to the origin of this injury as no one can exactly point to when it occurred. I have no direct point, and I don't wish to cast aspersions, but the purpose of the post was to raise a legitimate question as others may ask regarding the authenticity of the report in the context of the current AFL policy on such matters. Please note: I'm a keen supporter of recreational drug-use. As such, I think the current AFL charade is ridiculous and would hope that my club wouldn't partake in such a pretense. Unwarranted as directly related to Lumumba, yes, unnecessary, no.
*Well, it seems my post was deleted regardless. Wasn't advocating a position but raising a question. I'll take it elsewhere.