Everything posted by rpfc
-
CHANGES: Rd 12 vs Brisbane
I would not change The Trio. Baker can have a run out there.
-
POSTGAME: Rd 11 vs Western Bulldogs
He was better but he was drowning in his own bath water since the NM game and we all saw it. He is a point of difference but IMO, the 3 Pressure forwards and McDonald are more important than Fritsch and he needs to fit into that system and not disrupt it. So no pie is eaten this night.
-
The political machinations at Collingwood
- POSTGAME: Rd 10 vs Adelaide
For Dees fans - supporting a good side is foreign territory so I will forgive those that lambast the honest critiques of our form. We have been down for a few weeks and we paid for it on the weekend - it is not ‘the end of the world’. Of course it isn’t, and nor are Fritsch being dropped, Gawn being told to lift, and the forwards given some home truths - Armageddon style events. The team can take some criticism that isn’t simply [censored] ing on Melksham. So take a deep breath everyone and stop being so bloody precious about everything you read on here.- Should Gawn have played the percentages and tried to force a draw?
I’m sure Max would want to lift - he even said in his podcast that he has been having a dip in form. Oddly enough he attributed maturity to not going up for marks that he competes for with Lever/TMac etc. I think he needs to listen to his own advice. He also has been ball watching in contests in the middle.- CHANGES: Rd 11 vs Western Bulldogs
Fritsch being omitted is ‘fanciful and ridiculous’? Ignores first options, doesn’t get involved defensively, and he goes missing when the heat is up of late. He has been worked out, I think he is on the bubble and it’s hardly Lord of the Rings...- CHANGES: Rd 11 vs Western Bulldogs
We are playing with four talls. Fritsch is the fourth tall. He doesn’t chase enough, he doesn’t compete on the ground - and it’s actually worse because his opponent is invariably a player who can rebound and get involved in transition - whereas a Weid or a Brown would have a taller opponent more unlikely to do that. I am a system coach - everyone has to buy in and no one gets to avoid the tenets just because they ‘are good for 2/3 goals...’ He needs to lift or find himself continue to be a liability.- MFCSS Article
The meltdown on here to a 1 point loss is fairly impressive. 15000 roentgens I would say. This is a flare up of the Syndrome; the worry that we are seeing the false dawn revealed. A portends of the two challenges next up in miniature. Demonland holds its breath, as Doom approaches. To next week, and the inevitable.- Game plans, tactics and all that jazz
- TEAMS: Rd 10 vs Adelaide
Well I was right about Brown being one of the many on the bubble. I think this tells you how highly they rate Weideman. Sure he can do near as good a job as Brown but they want him to re-sign... I still think BBB out of the square in a tight final is hard to beat but I applaud the MC sticking to their guns. Speaking of... Are people really going to get the [censored] over Chandler being dropped? Why exert so much energy over which of the 20th to 27th best player is playing? Especially when they didn’t sit anything alight last weekend.- Reward the Ball Winner or Tackler
The reference to coaches pushing for decision making to be taken out being the world over - an example that comes to mind is the ‘clear path’ rule in the NBA where if you foul someone in transition and you are the last person it is a ‘CP foul’ and is treated more severely than if there is one defender ahead of that person even if that defender is nowhere near impacting the ability for the offensive player to score. It is silly; the player was certain to score and the defender has stopped that - the fact of where an extra defender is is really immaterial. Again, the reason to keep ‘if no defender on front of the play then it is a CO foul’ is to avoid the officials to have to make a decision... Officials make decisions and sometimes they get it wrong. Boo hoo. Thanks for indulging me if you read the above.- Reward the Ball Winner or Tackler
Coaches and admin around the world are trying to take decision making out of the hands of those officiating - they claim it is in the name of simplicity but it is purely because it removes another variable so that the coaches have more control. Hardwick is turning into an entitled blowhard and you shouldn’t listen to him. The umpires need to judge whether; someone has had a chance to get rid of the footy, the tackle is fair, and the ball was correctly disposed of. The rules are fine, the umpires need support and guidance and the coaches need to [censored] off.- Game plans, tactics and all that jazz
The reason why we are number one scoring from turnovers is not because of our skill in moving the footy - it’s because of where those turnovers are occurring - very close to goal. That may be stating the obvious but we talk about the skills and the DE getting better but I don’t think that’s the driver behind our success. We are just creating havoc well up the ground and it is easier to turn that into a scoring opportunity.- POSTGAME: Rd 09 vs Carlton
I don’t think it’s uncommon. We realise what an opportunity the club now has and that enhances our anxiety and trolling of our emotion. I was better during the Carlton game as I knew we would respond and that the team’s effort is unquestionable right now. It will get easier to watch this over time as they are the real deal - but yes @old dee the club has conditioned us to expect the rug to be pulled and so we are understandably jumpy.- POSTGAME: Rd 09 vs Carlton
Our smalls are in such excellent form to keep the ball in our forward line. The leading patterns were understandably crossed and confused and that will get better over time. But if they want SW to be there, they will have to get creative with selection - I think Brown at FF is our best bet for success in 2021.- CHANGES: Rd 10 vs Adelaide
How many people on here wanted to drop Fritsch? I was probably the most vehement on here of the posters worth any salt about how bad his performance was and I didn’t say to drop him. Credit to him - he did lift (it wouldn’t be hard) - he chased harder and tackled and got to more contests. We all laud our new selfless buy in to ‘The System’ and the Demon Web and all that and if you are not playing your role in that you are on borrowed time. ANB, Spargo, Kosi, Fritsch, Jackson, Hibberd, Rivers, Harmes, Brown, Jordon, Brayshaw, Hunt, Petty, and TMac are all best 22 in 2021 if they are in form AND bought in. But if they do not buy in - there are players available who would be selected to replace them who would be happy to play that role.- CHANGES: Rd 10 vs Adelaide
If Viney is to replace Chandler, it will imbalance the smalls in the forward line. More time for mids who have to go through there - it is not a massive issue but one I would avoid if possible but the MC may see that as the desired set up at the end of the year. At the end of the day - your best players will work it out... ...provided they play their role.- POSTGAME: Rd 09 vs Carlton
Not true! Now if you would excuse me...- POSTGAME: Rd 09 vs Carlton
Daniher said Chris Lamb was a ten year full back and then delisted him a few months later.- CHANGES: Rd 10 vs Adelaide
Jackson competes in the air - as does Weed. I would prefer Jackson as he is too valuable as an option to change things if Gawn is not doing well in the ruck. That is all things being equal; if Weed shows a dominant streak against the Crows then that changes but he was just so-so in the wet unfortunately for him.- CHANGES: Rd 10 vs Adelaide
(1965 MFC Admin nods)- What they're saying down at Royal Parade
Remove formatting! Remove formatting! Won’t someone please think of the children?!- POSTGAME: Rd 09 vs Carlton
We are a very good team. We are rising up Mazlows hierarchy of needs this year so we look for improvements Good System - it’s fully bought in, sometimes there are some millionaires but their teammates are hard on themselves and they correct it. Brayshaw’s IQ - he was everywhere, if he could stop being lazy in execution he would have been clear BOG. Backline strong with Rivers setting himself apart from most kids in the AFL. Fritsch better around the ground and defensively. He probably got shown some vision and responded well. HFF is the toughest position in the game. Spargo, ANB, Kosi - our most important forwards with TMac - they are the reason we can play like this and execute this system. Bad Entries into forward line again... Leading patterns in forward line - they have not played much footy and it shows. They need time together and TMac showed he can play well up the ground as well as deep so we have an opportunity to create a forward line that is dangerous in different ways. They just need time. Meh Umpiring is tough as it is with the rule changes - they are doing fine - they are consistently inconsistent so quit whingeing. C7 commentary - we have these Neanderthals commentate because the nuff nuff fan base demands ‘credentials’ and a rooster in between the legs of those who put their hand up to call the game. Awesome Being a Dees supporter. PS. But I would take Viney back against the Dogs...- TEAMS: Rd 09 vs Carlton
Lol. FMD - it’s amazing the lengths some fans will go to give a bloke an excuse for a horrible game. If we was concussed - he shouldn’t have played. For himself and the team. He suited up and is fair game.- TEAMS: Rd 09 vs Carlton
So Fritsch is currently our 5th most important forward and 3rd option going forward. He needs to be present defensively because he is non existent at times and was an anomaly in the space time continuum for 3 hours last Saturday night. - POSTGAME: Rd 10 vs Adelaide