Timothy Reddan-A'Blew

I know, Mate; it's what I did each time I strayed into any number of this week's threads! I continue to feel wretched... (Sorry, BM; just trying to lighten the room. It's OK; I see the door...)

Can we just get to the hearing? Please?

Swans 9.14 after their 7.14 against us, vs 11.8 and 11.11, too: now that's terminal bad kicking. We at least have the chance to make amends...

And another thing: Kudos to those 'Landers who, going into last night, had (and hopefully still have!) the 'We got this' mindset. But for the kicking, they were right! The rest of us, in our MFCSS mindsets, 'project', assuming the players, coaches, etc, feel how we feel and that situations are as we see them. That won't actually be how it is for them.

'Bombing it in, bombing it in, bombing it in'! Ease up. Someone with more persistence than me could do an analysis of how many 'chaos kicks' from forward of centre into the fifty by Collingwood became scores. They seemed pretty common, at our (Punt Road) end at least. No problems for Collingwood, then (side note: that did worry me in terms of our defensive structure and response). So, is it method of entry or response when it gets there? The difference last night between a win and a loss - all that matters in a final - gets back to the kicking when it got there: 3 of our 11 behinds (incl 2 posters) and 3+OOB become goals and we win.

...to which I add: Since we got our 'radar' back in Rd17 and before last night (109.80), 7.11 and at least 3 out on the full becomes 11.8, 10.9.

...which would have won last night's game. Just saying.

Ouch...

Real name revealed at last! Frank.

🤔

Tongue. Cheek. 😊

Curious that so much football has got onto here. And seemingly triggered by there being 'no football' out there. @DeelightfulPlay, I did try to do my bit; I went looking to see if Aunty Donna did a banana sketch. They do. Shall we say, they've come quite a way since then...

I feel you're all really hanging out for the answer [insert Sarcasm emoji]. Well, in the end-of-H&A-into-finals seasons, as we're now in, they got a stretch of suspension, generally for being 'handy' (👊), causing them to miss finals. Messrs Lloyd and Fletcher won leadership for being suspended twice, with Lloyd achieving seniority for his longer combined stretch.

What he is is Sam Stynes' husband. Bit of Demon royalty there! He, David Rennick and Kate Roffey make a powerful combo at any table where our future base is being planned or negotiated.

Would they have worked it out yet? Lot of research to catch up on.

Various overseas destinations.

Battle sore, at least?

Remind us of the circumstances of this pic, Nase? Preseason 'invited to train on'? Means anything?

Shameless plug: Puzzle thread. Still 24 hours. 🤔 (Warning: May exacerbate Twilight Zonitis)

*cough* Not quite? 👋😉

...though not quite so certainly in these here new fangled days?

Kudos to you all in maintaining a view of the total in detail! For me it was an un-vote-able mix of moments and the powerful big picture.

Shapeshifter

I think the AFLW1 lockout opener may have it covered. But since?

Many more than one if it's my flared-briefly 1987 finals poster boy. Played a few more at Doggies?