FireInTheBennelly

Hmmmm, I wonder why that would have been..... I'd suggest they might get a little busier post game this year, and on into the next few. With any luck they'll have gone broke by, let's say, around early October 2018.

I like it. My thoughts: 3 J Viney, 2 T Mac 1 Ward

Was serious. You're referring to the 'tomorrow' in the original OP I'm assuming? I figured it would be fixed up soon enough, and hey presto....

It's a good question. Who's going to stop him? If he's over his marking issues from the last few weeks he could be in line to take a massive number of contested marks. Anything could happen I guess, it will all depend on the supply he's given. I'm going to go with 9 goals, in a gigantic score.

Yes, I did the same.

Yep saw that, and immediately thought, that's the exact opposite to how we've been playing football for 5 years. Feet, head, behind, over, under. Nope, this was to advantage, didn't have to break stride. A couple of terms I'd like to see a lot more of. Was beautiful.

MFCSS stops now! We smash them by 15-20 goals. Tmac keeps daniher goalless. EFCSS starts now

After that dream I'd be blocking you from using the word on, not in. That's some good gear you're getting!

For what it's worth I think it has something to do with the delay for multiple posts. I just received a message telling me I had to wait one second to post again. I clicked submit again and was told I had to wait 12 seconds to post. When I updated the page however, that new post was submitted. If I hadn't checked and just submitted again after the 12 seconds it would have been a multiple post. There's either an issue with the logic around multiple post delays, and when a post should be submitted if within the delay time, or when a message should be displayed to the user for multiple posts. I think the latter, i.e. the timer shouldn't start again if the post was held back because within time delay. Make sense? Of course there could be other issues, but that's one of them.

I was thinking until the last quarter Davis was a shot at the 1 vote, but Ward got the nod in the end. Think you're about right.

That's about how I saw it as well, cheers.

Was discussing the Brownlow with a mate and he suggested to me that Callan Ward would get the 3 votes from this game. I was fairly shocked, thinking Viney was locked in 100%. Is there any possibility he could be right? Any at all?

I'm not surprised he doesn't make many tackles. If I had the pill and he was coming at me I'd get rid of the [censored] thing ASAP, regardless of how!!

I can't believe nobody has picked up on AFL strategy here. Bad press regarding head knocks, concussion, the game is ruining the lives of young men, a few law suits. Oh no my friend, it's not the knocks, it's the [censored] substances, and they're into anything they can get their hands on, all of them. By not telling the clubs they hold everyone to ransom. It's [censored] with their heads your honour. It's an insurance policy. I'm not saying that's correct. Not even saying it's right, or wrong. But think about it. Without the AFL, what a great game Aussie Rules would be.....

You answered your own question. David King is very [censored] average!

Pies players spent too much energy on the bench shaking, gnashing teeth and scratching their forearms

I think he's down on confidence. The injury slowed him down last year and he was caught holding the ball [censored] constantly..... This preseason he tried to play as he was in 2014 but he was pinged HTB a couple of times again, where there was no prior opportunity however. His head dropped noticeably, and I don't think he's gotten past it yet. Good opportunity to bring in Angus and give Tyson 'a live kill' at Casey. He'll be back.

Essendon pumped as well. This is what footy's all about! Only issue is having Carlton play Richmond, it means one of them has to win.

Cold pies, get your cold pies!

I hope they line up on each other next week.

Could only listen on radio, but they said he had to go down to the rooms for treatment for 5-7 minutes at least twice. He must've picked up a knock early on, but that just makes the performance even better.

It's definitely 10 metres. It's going to be one of the most inconsistently applied rules you'll see this year. The other being the dangerous tackle rule. The way both rules are designed it gives more control too the umpires discretion, and we know they are incompetent. Its going to be very frustrating.

Agreed, should have been 50 metres

Dazzle, might want to check out disposal efficiency numbers, in particular 1 Tom McDonald

Dazzle, might want to check out disposal efficiency numbers, in particular 1 Tom McDonald