Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Was initially underwhelmed by Garry, not that I missed Robbo, but felt he has found a tempo. But several of the segments have definitely added value. Razor's edge should have been done 20 years ago, as annoying as he is, he can explain a decision and I love the way Garry pushes yet is prepared to concede when a point is well made. Simmo and Horse are just gold and you can tell Gerald is wetting himself with the content. (and just quietly they show King up regularly, would much rather here what Simmo/Horse has to say), because they are not having a bet each way. They tell you what you gain for a move and what you lose.

That said First Crack, which after Tom was given the flick improved out of sight is awful when Jay is on, click baiting lines straight out of the mid week tackle rubbish (I only watched once as it was a News.com circle [censored]),

That The Front Bar is still more watchable than all the 'serious' 7&9 swill is an indictment of TV production today. And the FB frequently misses as well but at least no one is taking themselves too seriously.

Sorry random thoughts as I trawl media for stuff on the Dees

 

First Crack has definitely taken a nose dive. I understand that we’ve beaten the two worst teams in unconvincing fashion, but literally the only analysis they’ve provided in the last two weeks is that Max Gawn is a good player, and maybe given us 40 seconds total. Seems like they have pacing issues but come on.

7 hours ago, Bang Bang Bang said:

First Crack has definitely taken a nose dive. I understand that we’ve beaten the two worst teams in unconvincing fashion, but literally the only analysis they’ve provided in the last two weeks is that Max Gawn is a good player, and maybe given us 40 seconds total. Seems like they have pacing issues but come on.

There's little point discussing Melb v WC, Ess v North and such games. We get our fair share of analysis when we play in good contests. Welcome to being ordinary, it sucks doesn't it? If we beat Hawthorn they'll talk about us.

 
  • Demonland changed the title to AFL 360 & First Crack

Wonder if Gary will give Max the 3 votes in his MVP for the round?

He's given the 3 to Toby Greene and Matt Rowell in games against us, as well as minor votes to Xerri and Danger in rounds 2 and 4. Maybe over compensating with this MFC hat on.

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

Razor is articulate and forthright and a breath of fresh air.

TBh I thought this segment would be horrible but its been good, even if I dont agree with the AFl/Umpires stance you find out why they call it and when it happens again you then realise why.

55 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Wonder if Gary will give Max the 3 votes in his MVP for the round?

He's given the 3 to Toby Greene and Matt Rowell in games against us, as well as minor votes to Xerri and Danger in rounds 2 and 4. Maybe over compensating with this MFC hat on.

WC or not, it was Max's best performance from a stats perspective of his career. If he doesn't get the 3, then Gary - as he is known to do - is taking the anti-MFC supporter thing too far. Gawny is deserving. 22 contested possessions, 9 clearances and 1 goal is not an easy feat. Dangerfield will get 2 and Merrett will get 1.

 
3 hours ago, Roost it far said:

There's little point discussing Melb v WC, Ess v North and such games. We get our fair share of analysis when we play in good contests. Welcome to being ordinary, it sucks doesn't it? If we beat Hawthorn they'll talk about us.

I get that, but one thing First Crack was really reliable with in previous years was dedicating time to every game that was played. Sure, the [censored] teams would be wedged in at the end, but they still got covered. They can do better than telling us Max Gawn is a good player then cutting to an ad break two weeks in a row.


3 hours ago, Bang Bang Bang said:

I get that, but one thing First Crack was really reliable with in previous years was dedicating time to every game that was played. Sure, the [censored] teams would be wedged in at the end, but they still got covered. They can do better than telling us Max Gawn is a good player then cutting to an ad break two weeks in a row.

Complaining about the quality of footy shows......there's a word for such things but i can't think it atm.

16 hours ago, DEE fence said:

Was initially underwhelmed by Garry, not that I missed Robbo, but felt he has found a tempo. But several of the segments have definitely added value. Razor's edge should have been done 20 years ago, as annoying as he is, he can explain a decision and I love the way Garry pushes yet is prepared to concede when a point is well made. Simmo and Horse are just gold and you can tell Gerald is wetting himself with the content. (and just quietly they show King up regularly, would much rather here what Simmo/Horse has to say), because they are not having a bet each way. They tell you what you gain for a move and what you lose.

That said First Crack, which after Tom was given the flick improved out of sight is awful when Jay is on, click baiting lines straight out of the mid week tackle rubbish (I only watched once as it was a News.com circle [censored]),

That The Front Bar is still more watchable than all the 'serious' 7&9 swill is an indictment of TV production today. And the FB frequently misses as well but at least no one is taking themselves too seriously.

Sorry random thoughts as I trawl media for stuff on the Dees

You mentioned my two favourite segments on 360: Razor and Simmo & Horse. I love Razor’s input because it’s the closest we’ll ever get to an explanation of some of the questionable decisions. As for Simmo and Horse, who knew they were so entertaining?! They’re funny and sharp and work well together.

7 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Wonder if Gary will give Max the 3 votes in his MVP for the round?

He's given the 3 to Toby Greene and Matt Rowell in games against us, as well as minor votes to Xerri and Danger in rounds 2 and 4. Maybe over compensating with this MFC hat on.

Not maybe… definitely. He does it all the time to varying degrees. It’s super disappointing

3 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

Not maybe… definitely. He does it all the time to varying degrees. It’s super disappointing

As expected, Gary does Gary things by choosing to excessively be anti-Melbourne and give Danger the 3 votes. i suspect it had to do with the quality of the opposition.

13 hours ago, Redleg said:

Razor is articulate and forthright and a breath of fresh air.

I’m a big Razor fan. He was always fair as an umpire. Sure, he loved the attention and being in the spotlight but his adjudication was second to none. I wish more umpires were like him.


  • Author
48 minutes ago, Ghostwriter said:

I’m a big Razor fan. He was always fair as an umpire. Sure, he loved the attention and being in the spotlight but his adjudication was second to none. I wish more umpires were like him.

Better than Nicholls that is for sure.

8 hours ago, Roost it far said:

Complaining about the quality of footy shows......there's a word for such things but i can't think it atm.

Unwatchable.

I don't watch any of them.

12 hours ago, DEE fence said:

Better than Nicholls that is for sure.

And old mate Williamson (#2). Although I suspect he’s had a talking to because the last couple of our games at which he’s officiated he’s been uncharacteristically less harsh on us.

31 minutes ago, Pipefitter said:

Not feeling 360 without Robbo. The loveable buffoon made that show.

Gaz has made the show watchable for me once again. I know he’ll go hard at the Dees if we are going [censored] but at least I know that comes from a - wait for it- place of love.

I also get the sense that he won’t put up with any [censored] directed at the club either.

Yes he tends to go a bit overboard trying to play the ‘I’m not just saying this as a MFC supporter’. Maybe he should join the circus and start peddling MFC propaganda content to further our cause.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 17 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies