Jump to content

Featured Replies

layzie - great post that I feel reflects the thoughts and sentiments of the overwhelming majority of Demonlanders.  
Not that I ever “accept” defeat but the panels thoughts and (mostly) positive analysis puts a lot into perspective, and has made me realise how brutally difficult it is for the club to achieve the ultimate success. 
I am even looking forward to hearing their analysis of Friday’s heartbreak.  
Then of course there will, no doubt after a well earned break, the speculation then analysis of the trade and draft period before the frustratingly long break before the preseason.  
Whatever, just love the Dees frustrating as that can be.  
🔴🔵🔴🔵❤️💙❤️💙

 
On 9/16/2023 at 1:32 PM, layzie said:

Demonland means a lot to me and I wanted to express my gratitude to all of you for providing the best place in town for all talk regarding our beloved Demons

Fabulous sentiments, layz. 

 
  • Author
3 hours ago, Webber said:

Fabulous sentiments, layz. 

Thanks Webber! Certainly beats the alternatives 🙂

  • 1 month later...

I think a little reminder is in order…

Thank you, mods.

Thank you for the many, many hours you put into this site whilst juggling full-time jobs, families and interests other than footy. Thank you for covering the costs of running the site that ads and subscriptions alone don't quite cover. Thank you for never taking a break: 365 days a year for two decades. Thank you for providing such an informative, interesting and fun space for Dees diehards to talk about the greatest football club in the world.

To the folks who clearly need reminding that there’s certain things that can’t be discussed on DL… If that’s a problem for you, perhaps you can find *another footy forum, one wherein it’s open slather, and anything goes.

What you SHOULDN’T do is create a new thread just to bemoan the censorship. Nor should you mock DL in snide remarks strewn about in other threads. Andy is the one who can and will be sued should something that “crosses the line” be published, even though it’s not him who said it.

*good luck finding another footy forum that comes anywhere near the standard of this one.

edit: I just saw the updated notice that appears above the topics list. Hopefully this time folks read it properly. 

Edited by WalkingCivilWar


1 hour ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

I think a little reminder is in order…

Thank you, mods.

Thank you for the many, many hours you put into this site whilst juggling full-time jobs, families and interests other than footy. Thank you for covering the costs of running the site that ads and subscriptions alone don't quite cover. Thank you for never taking a break: 365 days a year for two decades. Thank you for providing such an informative, interesting and fun space for Dees diehards to talk about the greatest football club in the world.

To the folks who clearly need reminding that there’s certain things that can’t be discussed on DL… If that’s a problem for you, perhaps you can find *another footy forum, one wherein it’s open slather, and anything goes.

What you SHOULDN’T do is create a new thread just to bemoan the censorship. Nor should you mock DL in snide remarks strewn about in other threads. Andy is the one who can and will be sued should something that “crosses the line” be published, even though it’s not him who said it.

*good luck finding another footy forum that comes anywhere near the standard of this one.

edit: I just saw the updated notice that appears above the topics list. Hopefully this time folks read it properly. 

Can Kane Cornes be Sued? He spends his entire shift discussing the Current MFC issues 

5 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Can Kane Cornes be Sued? He spends his entire shift discussing the Current MFC issues 

Obviously not. Otherwise he’d be lawyering up every five minutes.

 Come on M, you of all people should know that’s an entirely different thing (given your background of working in the media). 

1 minute ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Obviously not. Otherwise he’d be lawyering up every five minutes.

 Come on M, you of all people should know that’s an entirely different thing (given your background of working in the media). 

Once everything is in the public domain, the dynamics change. I find it interesting there is no discussion allowed considering Goodwin and Pert were interviewed on Radio…

 
1 minute ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Once everything is in the public domain, the dynamics change. I find it interesting there is no discussion allowed considering Goodwin and Pert were interviewed on Radio…

Read every single word at the top of every page and respect this difficult decision. You aren’t the one with your ass on the line. 

11 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Read every single word at the top of every page and respect this difficult decision. You aren’t the one with your [censored] on the line. 

I am just asking a question, not starting an argument 

if the Radio interview had not taken place, I fully understand your position 


I can appreciate how difficult and time consuming it must be to filter problematic content. Having said that, the blanket censorship and removal of posts that has occurred recently stymied Demonland members’ need to talk through what was happening. I found myself turning back to SEN and CH7 (media outlets I had removed from my listening habits) to keep up with developments. I’ll be honest, I felt Demonland had let us down in our hour of need. As superficial as that reaction may have been, it was ‘real’ at the time. Demonland is our first port of call in a crisis. It has a cathartic effect, to share impressions with fellow Demon supporters and seek a balanced view; something the wider media is unlikely to provide. For a period, Demonland became irrelevant! Contribution numbers fell away significantly. There must be some ‘middle ground’ that can be achieved in times like this.

4 minutes ago, waynewussell said:

I can appreciate how difficult and time consuming it must be to filter problematic content. Having said that, the blanket censorship and removal of posts that has occurred recently stymied Demonland members’ need to talk through what was happening. I found myself turning back to SEN and CH7 (media outlets I had removed from my listening habits) to keep up with developments. I’ll be honest, I felt Demonland had let us down in our hour of need. As superficial as that reaction may have been, it was ‘real’ at the time. Demonland is our first port of call in a crisis. It has a cathartic effect, to share impressions with fellow Demon supporters and seek a balanced view; something the wider media is unlikely to provide. For a period, Demonland became irrelevant! Contribution numbers fell away significantly. There must be some ‘middle ground’ that can be achieved in times like this.

Please re-read the top of the page. It has been updated today. 

If you want Demonland to be around to discuss our 14th flag you’ll respect this difficult decision. 

There are serious issues that warrant discussion and I wish I could provide a place where they can be discussed without getting into areas that can land me in trouble. 

There are plenty of places on the internet to discuss these topics on social media which have deeper pockets then me and are seemingly immune to any fallout  

I can’t afford to test the limits and our moderators are volunteers that can’t catch everything. 

Don’t think that by shaming me by saying Demonland is/was irrelevant will change my mind when you have no skin in the game. 

33 minutes ago, waynewussell said:

I felt Demonland had let us down in our hour of need.

For a period, Demonland became irrelevant!

Ffs, are you serious? “let us down”?!! The mods didn’t let anyone down. That’s emotional manipulation right there. Nor is DL irrelevant, temporarily or otherwise. 

If DL means so very much to you, as you’ve made clear in your post, imagine not having it at all. Because that’s what’d happen if the mods end up being sued.

40 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Read every single word at the top of every page and respect this difficult decision. You aren’t the one with your [censored] on the line. 

Respect this position. Beware of the voices that urge you take on risk when those voices have no responsibility or accountability. The world is increasingly litigious and populated by folk who feel they should be compensated for some personal hurt or grievance. 

Similar to the health industry where everyday medical professionals have to deal with patient requests and demands that may be inappropriate. If the professional provides a service just to avoid a confrontation or to keep the patient happy then the professional takes the risk of being investigated by the relevant health body. A  mistake or wrong action can risk a  professional losing their registration and right to practice. Together with the risk of financial penalty. As you say apropos of Demonland, the editors [censored] is on the line. You owe posters nothing.. 


10 minutes ago, hemingway said:

Respect this position. Beware of the voices that urge you take on risk when those voices have no responsibility or accountability. The world is increasingly litigious and populated by folk who feel they should be compensated for some personal hurt or grievance. 

Similar to the health industry where everyday medical professionals have to deal with patient requests and demands that may be inappropriate. If the professional provides a service just to avoid a confrontation or to keep the patient happy then the professional takes the risk of being investigated by the relevant health body. A  mistake or wrong action can risk a  professional losing their registration and right to practice. Together with the risk of financial penalty. As you say apropos of Demonland, the editors [censored] is on the line. You owe posters nothing.. 

Very well said. Your last sentence, in particular. 

18 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Ffs, are you serious? “let us down”?!! The mods didn’t let anyone down. That’s emotional manipulation right there. Nor is DL irrelevant, temporarily or otherwise. 

If DL means so very much to you, as you’ve made clear in your post, imagine not having it at all. Because that’s what’d happen if the mods end up being sued.

Unfortunately, you extracted sentences that supported your knee-jerks!

"As superficial as that reaction may have been, it was ‘real’ at the time". I quote myself acknowledging that I was superficial to think that Demonland had let us down.

"For a period, Demonland became irrelevant!" Meaning; 'not connected with or relevant to something'. Can you see my meaning?

7 minutes ago, waynewussell said:

Unfortunately, you extracted sentences that supported your knee-jerks!

"As superficial as that reaction may have been, it was ‘real’ at the time". I quote myself acknowledging that I was superficial to think that Demonland had let us down.

"For a period, Demonland became irrelevant!" Meaning; 'not connected with or relevant to something'. Can you see my meaning?

I can see your meaning. If you felt that way AT THE TIME, why post it now? Especially since you acknowledge the superficiality of it.

And by any definition “irrelevant” is something that DL has never been nor will ever be.

Incidentally, one who knee-jerks doesn’t take the time to extract certain sentences. That’s a contradiction in terms. 

42 minutes ago, old55 said:

Keep up the great work @Demonland - hope this message is OK

20231102_143132.thumb.jpg.cd850851981d1db28782cd2df4575f7f.jpg

Hey old55, I’ll see your T-shirt and raise you a hoodie…

5AAFC11B-980A-411E-801D-108C5DDAF65E.thumb.jpeg.5d3551cd168046161afdf5924ffec166.jpeg
 

😂

1 minute ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

I can see your meaning. If you felt that way AT THE TIME, why post it now? Especially since you acknowledge the superficiality of it.

And by any definition “irrelevant” is something that DL has never been nor will ever be.

Incidentally, one who knee-jerks doesn’t take the time to extract certain sentences. That’s a contradiction in terms. 

The answer to your first question is simple. I was posting at the time, but those posts evaporated. I have a copy if you require evidence.

I want to make this clear; I'm referring to Demonland the site, not Demonland an individual.

I'm highlighting the role Demonland (the site) plays in providing a forum that helps steady the ship in a storm. I fully understand the decision that moderators enacted, I'm communicating the side-effects of that action.


1 minute ago, waynewussell said:

The answer to your first question is simple. I was posting at the time, but those posts evaporated. I have a copy if you require evidence.

I want to make this clear; I'm referring to Demonland the site, not Demonland an individual.

I'm highlighting the role Demonland (the site) plays in providing a forum that helps steady the ship in a storm. I fully understand the decision that moderators enacted, I'm communicating the side-effects of that action.

I get it. You don’t need to show me evidence since I’ve seen a lot of those posts before they were removed. I just took issue with the tone of your post, I got the vibe of entitlement. Maybe I’m being over-sensitive because I worry about losing this site. That would be just awful and senseless. I love DL for the reasons you outlined above, but I’m forever mindful that we’re lucky to have it and I’d hate for anything to jeopardise it. 

1 hour ago, Demonland said:

Please re-read the top of the page. It has been updated today. 

If you want Demonland to be around to discuss our 14th flag you’ll respect this difficult decision. 

There are serious issues that warrant discussion and I wish I could provide a place where they can be discussed without getting into areas that can land me in trouble. 

There are plenty of places on the internet to discuss these topics on social media which have deeper pockets then me and are seemingly immune to any fallout  

I can’t afford to test the limits and our moderators are volunteers that can’t catch everything. 

Don’t think that by shaming me by saying Demonland is/was irrelevant will change my mind when you have no skin in the game. 

on this, why can other platforms discuss this without ramifications and not Dland? interested to hear why you think Dland is different on this? none of the other websites or platforms have been sued at all with any of the discussions that have taken place about any topic. namely bigfooty.

 

Not arguing just more so pointing out that there is a lot more rumours and inuenndo on there and they havent been brought to their knees.

 

I totally get the idea of potential risk that you dont want to roll the dice with it though, was more just stating that nothing has happened to the biggest rumor mill of all in bigfooty.

Edited by Tracca

cant see how dland became irrelevant.... thats a bit harsh, they probably had more members logging in discussing trade period than ever before.

 

Whoa, must have missed something. Been in Singapore for a while and coming back feels like I left the room and a fight started.

4 hours ago, Left Foot Snap said:

Whoa, must have missed something. Been in Singapore for a while and coming back feels like I left the room and a fight started.

haha think ill join ya in singapore!!!

 

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 385 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 47 replies