Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Optimistic of a good win on Saturday. We're tough to beat out at Casey Fields at the best of times and by my counting we could have up to 19 AFL listed players run out against the Lions. Throw in Jimmy Munro, Mitch White and Matt Buntine for support and we should have our 3rd Grand Final appearance in the VFL in seven years.

 

Three Queensland teams in the preliminary final - can someone remind what the V in VFL stands for again?

The biggest threat to Casey winning is Goodwin having a change of heart at the selection table and putting Dunstan and a couple of other Casey guns in the Melbourne side.

My stupid niece is having a birthday party during this game. What a selfish 4 year old! 

 


19 minutes ago, poita said:

Three Queensland teams in the preliminary final - can someone remind what the V in VFL stands for again?

Valid

/sarcasm

Edited by In Harmes Way

2 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

My stupid niece is having a birthday party during this game. What a selfish 4 year old! 

 

I'm honestly lucky to watch any game other than the Dees on a given weekend at the moment. Responsibilities galore. 

 

Massive game on Saturday the 10th of September at Casey at 1:10 pm. Casey has just had the bye after beating Sydney by 47 points. Brisbane are also in the PF after beating Carlton by 12 points last week. The winner will play the winner of the Southport v Gold Coast game.

Possible team

B: D.Smith, Turner, Rosman

HB: Bowey, Tomlinson, Rivers

C: Howes, Dunstan, Baker

HF: Laurie, van Rooyen, Joel.Smith

F: Bedford, M.Brown, Chandler

FOLL: Weideman, White, Munro

IC: Buntine, McVee, Woewodin, Moniz-Wakefield, Valentine

 

I think Rivers will make way for McDonald in the senior team.

Edited by WERRIDEE

I stand to be corrected, but I'm not sure bowey is eligible to play. He has played too many AFL games , more than 12?

I managed to find the rule, 20, but it is extremely difficult to interpret. Written by a very big committee?


2 hours ago, Bystander said:

I stand to be corrected, but I'm not sure bowey is eligible to play. He has played too many AFL games , more than 12?

I managed to find the rule, 20, but it is extremely difficult to interpret. Written by a very big committee?

I don't believe these restrictions apply whilst the AFL team is still playing. If the AFL side loses this week, Bowey wouldn't be eligible to play in the VFL Grand Final.

It is Rule 20, see subrule b and g.

Really hard to read and I get paid to read stuff and understand it.

What makes it hard is that most of the subrules start off by saying in effect "despite the other rules..." but you end up going in circles.

@poita is right. While our AFL team remains alive, all players are eligible for VFL finals. So a win over the Lions on Friday Night in the AFL ensures we have a full list to choose from for the VFL Grand Final should we make it.

Yes, that is what subrule (e) says, but it is followed by (g) which says despite other rules maximum 12 games. It also says b applies which provides that if a player has played a game in the ones after 1 July, he has to have played 6 VFL games to be eligible.

What complicates matters is that while 20.g is expressed to be despite the other rules, so is 20.e.

Good fodder for the High Court now that appeals to Privy Council are abolished.

But, maybe I'm wrong.


1 hour ago, Bystander said:

Yes, that is what subrule (e) says, but it is followed by (g) which says despite other rules maximum 12 games. It also says b applies which provides that if a player has played a game in the ones after 1 July, he has to have played 6 VFL games to be eligible.

What complicates matters is that while 20.g is expressed to be despite the other rules, so is 20.e.

Good fodder for the High Court now that appeals to Privy Council are abolished.

But, maybe I'm wrong.

Don't overthink it. Cyril Rioli played 1 game for Box Hill in 2014 which was the Grand Final despite playing exclusively for Hawthorn when fit earlier in the year. Why could he do that?? Because Hawthorn were still alive in the AFL.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-21/footscray-beats-box-hill-to-win-vfl-grand-final/5758992

30 minutes ago, MadAsHell said:

Don't overthink it. Cyril Rioli played 1 game for Box Hill in 2014 which was the Grand Final despite playing exclusively for Hawthorn when fit earlier in the year. Why could he do that?? Because Hawthorn were still alive in the AFL.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-21/footscray-beats-box-hill-to-win-vfl-grand-final/5758992

Maybe Clarry and May can play a double header. Can't see Casey losing then 🤣

Peanuts.  Peanuts,  shilling a bag. Peanuts 

every other vfl ground. And the Vafa Preston grounds port Melb and Prahran if I remember

Sandringham and Dandenong too

3 hours ago, 640MD said:

Peanuts.  Peanuts,  shilling a bag. Peanuts 

every other vfl ground. And the Vafa Preston grounds port Melb and Prahran if I remember

Sandringham and Dandenong too

Used to always enjoy a noon pie they sold on the wing at Prahran.


I understand that entry to the preliminary final is free. I assume no need to book tickets, just rock up at the ground?

 

Due to being no change in the seniors I have to put McDonald in the side.

 

B: D.Smith, Turner, Rosman

HB: Bowey, Tomlinson, Baker

C: Howes, Dunstan, Woewodin

HF: Chandler, van Rooyen, Joel.Smith

F: Bedford, McDonald, M.Brown

FOLL: Weideman, White, Laurie

IC: Buntine, Munro, McVee, Moniz-Wakefield, Valentine

CASEY DEMONS

B: D.Turner 42 A.Tomlinson 20 J.McVee 41
HB: M.Buntine 71 C.Ellison 79 J.Bowey 17
C: B.Howes 22 L.Dunstan 27 O.Baker 33
HF: R.Steele 54 M.Brown 38 K.Chandler 37
F: T.McDonald 25 J.Van Rooyen 21 T.Bedford 12
Foll: S.Weideman 26 M.White 52 J.Munro 47
I/C: G.Grey 68  A.Moniz-Wakefield 29 F.Rosman 19 D.Smith 34 R.Valentine 65 
Emerg: R.Baldi 56 J.Bell 73 B.Milford 74 A.Quigley 57

In: J.Bowey J.McVee A.Moniz-Wakefield R.Steele
 


Out: B.Laurie A.Quigley D.Smith T.Woewodin 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 30 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 241 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies