Jump to content

Featured Replies

Also interesting to see Hunt feature heavily in the intra club goals highlight.  Thought he was good against Carlton, as he was up forward for a lot of last year as well.

Really like the attributes of Hunt as a forward - he leads up well, kicks for goal well and runs himself into good positions to crumb and/or receive easy opportunitist goals, which is exactly what you would want from a player of his attributes to be getting into good spots to capitalize on the easy, high percentage goals that are there for the taking rather than having to battle for every goal.  I do think his hardness and willingness to chase and harass and put on forward pressure are pretty good too.

Will be interesting to see what he can produce in a forward line packed with other talented small-mid sized players like Kosi, Bennell, Freitch and Hannan.

 
16 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Yes but there are still times when a player marks outside fifty and kicks inside to a pack. That is when you expect the key forward to impact for a goal or two.

Let's face it....they're quickly becoming NQR

A goal or 2, but most likely to bring the ball to ground for small contested ball winners.   Not your jeffey type,  but more like mKozzy, Bennell, Jones, Viney, Lockhart, Spargo, Bedford, Chandler...

15 minutes ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

From the looks of the pictures on the club web site, it looks like the boys spent some time doing goal kicking practice out on the MCG.  Hoping that pays off.  In particular Freitch needs to improve on his Rd.2 output in this area.  We could have comfortably taken care of Carlton if he had kicked for goal more reliably.

I agree bad kicking is bad football, but if they kicked straight we’d have gone down by four goals. The yips aren’t the reason the game was so close

 
14 hours ago, nosoupforme said:

Melksham playing near his best is  vital to our forward line and hard to match up,  can pull down a mark one on one regularly.. However we have missed the presence Vanders the hard nosed bull that would liven up things out there and lead by example. 

Right on Dr G missed Vanders in 2019 and remember like yesterday of 2018 finals how good he was playing with minimal games for the year..                                               

We are a better side with an injury free Vanders.  

Who was it that was saying back in February that AVB should be finished up because hes injured again.?   I can't remember who they were now.

56 minutes ago, Half forward flank said:

An obvious with the game plan is we are not able to shut a side down when they kick back to back goals, All the other teams are aware of this weakness and exploit it. We keep hearing from Club and players we are as good as anyone at our best. Sometinmes that should mean halving a contest rather than going for broke every time. 

Really?? Seem another 17 clubs have the same problem. Come back to me when you have the solution.


33 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Premature?

No it isn’t. Our game yesterday did not go ahead, if that happens I expect the President of my Club to speak about it. 
 

How many other Presidents of AFL Clubs would you expect to remain silent in the reverse situation?

It’s premature because the AFL don’t know what’s happening with the spread of CoVID at Essendon, and the consequences for the whole competition that will result from that. If the Dons can’t play for a fortnight (or longer) then their season is effectively over and all their games are forfeited, as to think the AFL will postpone finals so the Dons can play us, Carlton, Collingwood prior is a fantasy. In addition, if any Doubt of any Dons being contagious then their next two games will also go the way ours did, because to allow the Don to infect another team would kill the AFL in 2020.

so in the big picture context of what the AFL are trying to deal with, the MFC are wisely acting maturely aware of the challenges and recognising that in two weeks we’re likely to have both the Blues and Pies in a similar situation to us, at which point we won’t even have to say anything...

as they say in the hood “bbc”...

Edited by PaulRB

1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Not arguing, but just asking. Why does it have to be in public?

No public comment perpetuates the stereotype that we are a soft touch, a club that just gets pushed around by other clubs and the AFL. We have been severely disadvantages through no fault of our own, I would be wanting answers from the AFL as to how they propose to mitigate this and put it out for the public so they are held accountable for it

1 minute ago, PaulRB said:

It’s premature because the AFL don’t know what’s happening with the spread of CoVID at Essendon, and the consequences for the whole competition that will result from that. If the Dons can’t play for a fortnight (or longer) then their season is effectively over and all their games are forfeited, as to think the AFL will postpone finals so the Dons can play us, Carlton, Collingwood prior is a fantasy. In addition, if any Doubt of any Dons being contagious then their next two games will also go the way ours did, because to allow the Don to infect another team would kill the AFL in 2020.

so in the big picture context of what the AFL are trying to deal with, the MFC are wisely acting maturely aware of the challenges and resigning that in two weeks we’re likely to have both the Blues and Pies in a similar situation to us, at which point we won’t even have to say anything...

as they say in the hood “bbc”...

I am not arguing any of that

But i still want to hear it from the President. I don’t consider a public Statement or interview to be Grandstanding

We need to look after ourselves as best we can

 

 

1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I don't know if they do or they don't.

But I also know that standing up for our club doesn't have to be done in public view. 

 

1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Yes it does. That is the point

Not enough is done on behalf of our club, in situations like this in Public. 

SWYL's right,    For Our club,  in Our current  'MfcSS'   predicament.

The club needs not a self perception of polite representation,  to those who control our destiny.  Or to others who have a crack at us.  >  this IMO is linked to our typical conservative playing attitudes.   And easy going attitudes when getting beaten down in games.

 

This club,  after 50+ years of doldrums,  needs fighting words from our leaders,  to inspire more fight,  more fire from all of us.   To help to kill off that bloody 'MfcSS'  syndrome.

This polite tosh is a part of our problem.

 

That's is why eddie and kennett and leaders from other clubs do speak louder publicly, to inspire all of that flock. 

It might not inspire Mcc folk,  might make them sit awkwardly,   but it will inspire those of us,  who crave an aggressive Mfc.

.

11 minutes ago, Grimes Times said:

Really?? Seem another 17 clubs have the same problem. Come back to me when you have the solution.

Not following you on the other 17 clubs GT.  We are the ones who cannot stop a run on. We got exposed on this as far back as the WC final. No need to be smart about it. How would I have the solution. I dont get paid hundreds of thousands, thats right hundreds of thousands of dollars to come up with a defensive game plan and state of mind.


Just now, Sir Why You Little said:

I am not arguing any of that

But i still want to hear it from the President. I don’t consider a public Statement or interview to be Grandstanding

We need to look after ourselves as best we can

That’s fair, an update from the club would be good, even to say they don’t yet know... 

1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Public Sentiment can be very useful 

For too long The MFC has sat quietly in the corner and taken the scraps

Exactly SWYL sire.

2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Not a word from the President yet, I expected more. That is all i have to say. 

Until I say it again and again and again.  ?


1 hour ago, Tarax Club said:

The dichotomy of views expressed in this thread and often across the spectrum of the zDemonland blogsphere. Brings to mind the glass half full v glass half empty conundrum, much loved by psychologists and their ilk. Our research has found where one sits is often not that simple. But on matters MFC we generally aspsire to option...

1163260318_halffull.thumb.jpg.e94bd169bc40e7ec64e8b9b8a1c0dda4.jpg

communist is wrong in this picture. there should be one single straw for communist. for the state.

That 3 straw image should read socialist, surely.

1 hour ago, PaulRB said:

I don’t agree that not grandstanding equates with taking the scraps. 
AFL is trying to act responsibly re-CoVID in the public’s health interests and run a big business footy competition during a pandemic... 

I sense swyls gripe isn't just about this instance,   but about our past 50 years of soft ineptitude from the top.

4 minutes ago, PaulRB said:

That’s fair, an update from the club would be good, even to say they don’t yet know... 

Exactly.

Playing a practice game on the ‘G was ok, but it is still dancing with your sister in terms of Match Fitness. 
We should be playing Essendrug next. 
The Fixture should be that flexible this year

1 hour ago, TheKozzieExperience said:

 

You are Russian, Tarax?   ?

No TKE, but we are Russianing for the next Flag! Before time runs out!

We can recommend a refreshing Red label Smirnoff with a Black label Tarax on ice. Or for the more affluent Demonland posters 'Legend of the Kremlin' neat. All in moderation of course! ?

Edited by Tarax Club
emphasis

4 minutes ago, demonstone said:

Until I say it again and again and again.  ?

Some people on here need waking up

They have accepted seconds for that long


2 minutes ago, Half forward flank said:

Not following you on the other 17 clubs GT.  We are the ones who cannot stop a run on. We got exposed on this as far back as the WC final. No need to be smart about it. How would I have the solution. I dont get paid hundreds of thousands, thats right hundreds of thousands of dollars to come up with a defensive game plan and state of mind.

Every club bar Bris, Port and Ess (1 less game)  have had a run of 4 or more goals kicked against them this year. Its not a problem that Melbourne has on its own. 

 

 

1 hour ago, Half forward flank said:

Some of us thought that footage was so real that we put kitchen aprons on and jumped off the house roof. Mum was not totally against the idea, just said, well be careful if you do it.

Bit different to today, isn't [censored].  now they spray the benches all the time with anti bacterial stuff, and wonder why our immune systems weaker.

We at Melbourne could do with more of those risk takers that have now grown.

51 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Premature?

No it isn’t. Our game yesterday did not go ahead, if that happens I expect the President of my Club to speak about it. 
 

How many other Presidents of AFL Clubs would you expect to remain silent in the reverse situation?

We should be awarded 4 premiership points for this round.

 
4 minutes ago, Grimes Times said:

Every club bar Bris, Port and Ess (1 less game)  have had a run of 4 or more goals kicked against them this year. Its not a problem that Melbourne has on its own.

In fact here are the stats for 2020.

I've kindly asked for stats for 2018 and 2019. Will report back if I get an answer.

20 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

No public comment perpetuates the stereotype that we are a soft touch, a club that just gets pushed around by other clubs and the AFL. We have been severely disadvantages through no fault of our own, I would be wanting answers from the AFL as to how they propose to mitigate this and put it out for the public so they are held accountable for it

It's US supporters,  and indirectly our players as well, which need that sub conscious lift for the spirits.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies