Jump to content

Featured Replies

He didn't get done in by Drew Petrie. In the few 50-50 contests he had, he competed well. The issue was the lack of midfield/forward pressure we provided, which was very reminiscent of last years efforts. Was very disappointing all round.

 

I was going to start the same topic but change the name to Colin Garland.

Then your profile name is true.

Spangher is better player ATM than Tom Mac and he can't get a regular game at Hawks and probably goes when Gibson comes back.

In fairness to Tom Mac, he is surrounded by butchers down in that back line. Imagine how much better he would be if he could offload to Birchall, Burgoyne, Hodge etc rather than Grimes, Howe, McKenzie etc.

 

The team overall fell short significantly today and it really exposed the weaknesses of some of our younger and/or less 'complete' players.

I've still got quite a bit of belief in Tom McDonald's future, as I do in Garland and Grimes.

Won't declare them to be future stars, but I can see all three being the 200-game stalwart types. And I think those types are very valuable in the current inflationary environment, when you see player salaries doubling and doubling again as you get into the A-graders and then the 'champions'.

Spangher is better player ATM than Tom Mac and he can't get a regular game at Hawks and probably goes when Gibson comes back.

In fairness to Tom Mac, he is surrounded by butchers down in that back line. Imagine how much better he would be if he could offload to Birchall, Burgoyne, Hodge etc rather than Grimes, Howe, McKenzie etc.

No.

Just no.


Wow. I didn't think Tommy was our worst today. In fact, I can't remember him making an error by foot. I remember half a dozen great spoils and a little bit of run. The delivery to the North forwards was the best I've seen us face this year. Gave our defenders often no chance.

I'd generally agree though that his decision making and kicking is a real impediment, to not only the team, but himself.

Yes GG Drew Petrie. Yoss, he was beaten by Drew tonight. Can't talk toward TMacs forward pressure as I watched on TV but I'll check it out at Etihad next week. I do agree he needs to clean up his disposal but he's not the only one down back.

  • Author

Wow. I didn't think Tommy was our worst today. In fact, I can't remember him making an error by foot. I remember half a dozen great spoils and a little bit of run. The delivery to the North forwards was the best I've seen us face this year. Gave our defenders often no chance.

I'd generally agree though that his decision making and kicking is a real impediment, to not only the team, but himself.

Half of his long kicks to forwards were shanks. Even if you are bombing it long you should kick it long, with some height and to the forwards/rucks preferred side which is usually the boundary side. Instead he was kicking it and it was landing short and to the defenders side.

He certainly wasn't our worst. This thread isn't about him being our worst. It's about me not seeing improvement or as much potential in him.

I can't help but think we thought Al Nicholson was the future of our backline and player him year after year until we finally had to do something about it. My concern is that McDonald is going to be an Al Nicholson. You can win games with him. You might even win a final. But unless he gets a whole lot smarter you wont win big finals with him.

Yes GG Drew Petrie. Yoss, he was beaten by Drew tonight. Can't talk toward TMacs forward pressure as I watched on TV but I'll check it out at Etihad next week. I do agree he needs to clean up his disposal but he's not the only one down back.

In case you haven't notice Petrie is on his last legs. He's pretty much done and hasn't played well all season.

 

Still pretty young too.

I'm happy to give him time.

Haha.

Mate, you give everyone time.

Not saying that McDonald should get the flick but jeez you have time for any individual who dons the jumper it seems.

His kicking, slow decision making and brain fades are seriously concerning for a bloke playing at this level.

That goes for most of our backling. Do people believe time will change these things?

Roos has drilled into players the need to compete and none of us can question the majority of the team's 'efforts' at that.

But holy [censored], we have some serious troubles with our lack of skill and decision making.

Major concerns.

Wow. I didn't think Tommy was our worst today. In fact, I can't remember him making an error by foot. I remember half a dozen great spoils and a little bit of run. The delivery to the North forwards was the best I've seen us face this year. Gave our defenders often no chance.

I'd generally agree though that his decision making and kicking is a real impediment, to not only the team, but himself.

Yes.

It's called players being able to kick adequately at the level they're playing at.

Hardly surprising.

Only at the MFC.

We have a team pretty much full of players who consistently miss targets and take way too long to move the ball forward.


Anyone reckon James Sellar was actually quite handy when he played in defense for us?

Tom McDonald is not a long-term solution to play as a KPD.

The reason for this is because 1) his disposal is sh!thouse and 2) his decision making is even worse.

People try and create excuses for him saying that he will improve with time and experience. However i disagree. To become a quality player (or even just a player you can rely on) they need to display at least some natural ability when it comes to skills and decision-making. McDonald has neither.

When you are working with 0 you end up with 0. If a club can improve a player by 'X' %, 'X' % of zero is still zero.

McDonald is more of a 3rd option (not tall) when it comes to getting the ball out of the back-line, in that he is neither the first or second choice to have the ball in hand.

Luckily Dunn has come in this year and held up one of these positions. But we are still a player or tall KPD short without Frawley (i see Garland as a third tall defender).

Should Frawley move on come end of year, it is imperative we bring in a quality tall defender by way of trade or the draft. That leaves the other early pick to bring in another young mid via the draft or trade period. Dream scenario would be bringing in one of Shiel or Coniglio with the compo pick, and Durdin falling through to our first rounder (but that's even more of as pipe dream than landing Roos).

Long story short, i wouldn't be relying on McDonald to be the cornerstone of our defence.

Edited by Demon Disciple

Spangher is better player ATM than Tom Mac and he can't get a regular game at Hawks and probably goes when Gibson comes back.

In fairness to Tom Mac, he is surrounded by butchers down in that back line. Imagine how much better he would be if he could offload to Birchall, Burgoyne, Hodge etc rather than Grimes, Howe, McKenzie etc.

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHA

no he is not.

Not even close.

Tom Mac is close to the best young key defenders in the league in my opinion.

I do agree, that he can be very frustrating. But get real here.


Should be easier on everyone when Hogan finally gets a gig so Frawley can go back to where he should be and make the match-ups better for everybody.

  • Author

Anyone reckon James Sellar was actually quite handy when he played in defense for us?

Yes but way way too slow. Good kick, really nice size, good intercept mark. But Pedo has pace especially since he's got his fitness up. Sellar always lacked a yard I thought.

My answer to the McDonald problem is Pedersen by the way. If Gawn steps up and we get some more mature and fitter forward flankers then I'd put Pedersen down back. He's got run and faith in his kicking.

Spangher in the best players once again for Hawks on Saturday in front of 70,000 people. Endurance is as good as Tom's, he is a much better kick and doesn't perform the clangers every single week.

FCS we've won 10 games in 3 years, we're absolutely shite so please don't defend them blindly.


Yes but way way too slow. Good kick, really nice size, good intercept mark. But Pedo has pace especially since he's got his fitness up. Sellar always lacked a yard I thought.

My answer to the McDonald problem is Pedersen by the way. If Gawn steps up and we get some more mature and fitter forward flankers then I'd put Pedersen down back. He's got run and faith in his kicking.

So Gawn is your answer to Pederson being the answer to McDonald then? ;)

thanks pal, didn't expect a pissant such as yourself to be able to decipher a deeper meaning.

Carry on treading water on the surface little one, me and a few others are going diving for treasure.

Oh I deciphered it old mate. But I can't say I necessarily agree with it.

Kicking ability and decision making are not things that can be EASILY changed once you reach AFL level.

Tommy Mac defends admirably and has a real knack for spoiling and contesting well, but as I keep saying...

Within the AFL, you need players that display a number of attributes at the elite level and tonight was yet further evidence that we are battlers of the highest order.

Skill level and decision making change marginally with confidence and momentum. Not monumentally.

We need to hit the draft hard and trade well again to get rid of the [censored] that is still on our list.

Oh I deciphered it old mate. But I can't say I necessarily agree with it.

Kicking ability and decision making are not things that can be EASILY changed once you reach AFL level.

Tommy Mac defends admirably and has a real knack for spoiling and contesting well, but as I keep saying...

Within the AFL, you need players that display a number of attributes at the elite level and tonight was yet further evidence that we are battlers of the highest order.

Skill level and decision making change marginally with confidence and momentum. Not monumentally.

We need to hit the draft hard and trade well again to get rid of the [censored] that is still on our list.

May i direct you to this thread, my old chum:

http://demonland.com/forums/index.php?/topic/36752-kicking-handballing-and-catching/

 

Half of his long kicks to forwards were shanks. Even if you are bombing it long you should kick it long, with some height and to the forwards/rucks preferred side which is usually the boundary side. Instead he was kicking it and it was landing short and to the defenders side.

He certainly wasn't our worst. This thread isn't about him being our worst. It's about me not seeing improvement or as much potential in him.

I can't help but think we thought Al Nicholson was the future of our backline and player him year after year until we finally had to do something about it. My concern is that McDonald is going to be an Al Nicholson. You can win games with him. You might even win a final. But unless he gets a whole lot smarter you wont win big finals with him.

Fair enough. I must admit, I have very low expectations of Tommy Mac's kicking. As long as he's not kicking it directly to the opposition in our defensive 50, I tend to view it as a win.

I agree that we'll never win finals with players with ordinary decision making. Improve the decision making and you'll find the errors will be minimised. He's an excellent defender and 21, so I'm happy to give him another two years to improve that kicking. I'd offer him a three year contract though.

Spangher in the best players once again for Hawks on Saturday in front of 70,000 people. Endurance is as good as Tom's, he is a much better kick and doesn't perform the clangers every single week.

FCS we've won 10 games in 3 years, we're absolutely shite so please don't defend them blindly.

Spangher is also 27 and at his third club. He's played 41 games of footy in 8 years of being on a list, unbroken. The football world has shown him a patience almost unprecedented, and he finally seems to have arrived.

Tom McDonald is 21, and has already played 52 games, often holding his own in one of the most under siege defences of all time. Yet plenty here are ready to burn him at the stake.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 31 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 60 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 23 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 257 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Haha
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland