Jump to content

POLL: Are you happy for us to take Viney at pick 3?

Range Rover
Range Rover
in Melbourne Demons

The Jack Viney Situation 227 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you happy enough for us to select Jack Viney at pick No.3 in the draft?

    • Yes
      119
    • No
      73

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

This poll is as useful as a dick with a knot in it.

We will take Viney, wherever we have to, and he is exactly what we need, whether some of you flogs realise it, or not.

What tree have you been living in ben?

Prophylactics with lots of "knots" in them have been doing a roaring trade for years LOL

  • Quote
    •  

    Only GWS and GC can force us to use Pick 3 on Viney.

    The team that nominates a father son selection has to use its next pick in the draft after the pick bid by another club.

    From what I've read GWS and GC are unlikely to do so.

  • Quote

    Only GWS and GC can force us to use Pick 3 on Viney.

    The team that nominates a father son selection has to use its next pick in the draft after the pick bid by another club.

    Thanks for the clarification.

  • Quote
    •  

    Only GWS and GC can force us to use Pick 3 on Viney.

    The team that nominates a father son selection has to use its next pick in the draft after the pick bid by another club.

    From what I've read GWS and GC are unlikely to do so.

    Yepp prettymuch what everyone's been talking about for six months now...

    Hellsgate reckons that he has heard that there is a possibility we wont take Viney. Not what ive heard from a club source and time will tell. But could you imagine us picking another player over him who fails while he rips it up for GWS - the embarrassment...

  • Quote

    No for two reasons.

    One being that I don't think we'll have to given I reckon that stuff will be sorted out behind closed doors between Melbourne, GC & GWS.

    And two and most importantly because it will send a huge message to the rest of the competition that MFC are not going to be dictated to by anyone. Everyone knows that Whitfield & Grundy are the two best players in the draft, so if GWS or GC wanted to play Russian Roulette and nominate Viney we should look them in the eye and simply say PASS. They are then left with a very good player, but not one who's rated in the top 3 in the draft when they have Picks 1 & 2. Those clubs would then have to answer for why a Whitfield, Gundy or a Toumpas has been let go purely to try and one up a battling club near the bottom of the ladder.

    As I've mentioned in another thread, I reckon a deal will be struck between the 3 clubs that will see a win, win, win.

    GWS to end up with picks 1,2 & 3 and take Whitfield, Grundy & Toumpas

    GC trade Pick 2 to GWS for MD Pick 1 (Jack Martin who will be an absolute jet!)

    Melbourne trade Pick 3 to GWS for MD Pick 2 (Jesse Hogan) allowing us to take Viney in the 2nd round and holding onto Pick 4.

  • Quote

    No for two reasons.

    One being that I don't think we'll have to given I reckon that stuff will be sorted out behind closed doors between Melbourne, GC & GWS.

    And two and most importantly because it will send a huge message to the rest of the competition that MFC are not going to be dictated to by anyone. Everyone knows that Whitfield & Grundy are the two best players in the draft, so if GWS or GC wanted to play Russian Roulette and nominate Viney we should look them in the eye and simply say PASS. They are then left with a very good player, but not one who's rated in the top 3 in the draft when they have Picks 1 & 2. Those clubs would then have to answer for why a Whitfield, Gundy or a Toumpas has been let go purely to try and one up a battling club near the bottom of the ladder.

    As I've mentioned in another thread, I reckon a deal will be struck between the 3 clubs that will see a win, win, win.

    GWS to end up with picks 1,2 & 3 and take Whitfield, Grundy & Toumpas

    GC trade Pick 2 to GWS for MD Pick 1 (Jack Martin who will be an absolute jet!)

    Melbourne trade Pick 3 to GWS for MD Pick 2 (Jesse Hogan) allowing us to take Viney in the 2nd round and holding onto Pick 4.

    If we make this deal we should double cross GWS after the FS bidding process. Pick 4 should be the only pick on the table for the mini-draft.

  • Quote

    No for two reasons.

    One being that I don't think we'll have to given I reckon that stuff will be sorted out behind closed doors between Melbourne, GC & GWS.

    And two and most importantly because it will send a huge message to the rest of the competition that MFC are not going to be dictated to by anyone. Everyone knows that Whitfield & Grundy are the two best players in the draft, so if GWS or GC wanted to play Russian Roulette and nominate Viney we should look them in the eye and simply say PASS. They are then left with a very good player, but not one who's rated in the top 3 in the draft when they have Picks 1 & 2. Those clubs would then have to answer for why a Whitfield, Gundy or a Toumpas has been let go purely to try and one up a battling club near the bottom of the ladder.

    As I've mentioned in another thread, I reckon a deal will be struck between the 3 clubs that will see a win, win, win.

    GWS to end up with picks 1,2 & 3 and take Whitfield, Grundy & Toumpas

    GC trade Pick 2 to GWS for MD Pick 1 (Jack Martin who will be an absolute jet!)

    Melbourne trade Pick 3 to GWS for MD Pick 2 (Jesse Hogan) allowing us to take Viney in the 2nd round and holding onto Pick 4.

    Nice thoughts but if a deal isnt done we wont pass.

  • Quote

    I'm so over the subject I want to cut my own toes off and feed them to the dog to see if she will eat them.

  • Quote
    •  

    I'm so over the subject I want to cut my own toes off and feed them to the dog to see if she will eat them.

    You might want to put some sause on your toe Biffen, Your dog might enjoy it more.

  • Quote

    I think something will be worked out via the mini draft, its been suggested GC are into Martin and has

    been the whisper all year, so that opens things up for us if we'd like to go down the mini draft route.

    GWS will want our pick 3, they can exploit the situation we are in with Viney and we can benefit by them doing so.

    Its a win/win.

  • Quote

    I'm a Dees and Suns member and go to all the Suns home games and the Suns need and will select Grundy at pick 2,they need a ruckman that can go forward and kick goals rather than Martin,who they have a few of that type.Sam Day,Tom Lynch are still very slight and Grundy is ready made.

    Round 1 will also see the debut of Jaeger O'Meara who will complement Ablett,Bennell,Swallow,Harmichael,Caddy (who will stay)

    Pick 2 will be Brody Grundy.

  • Quote

    If we make this deal we should double cross GWS after the FS bidding process. Pick 4 should be the only pick on the table for the mini-draft.

    We could, but it may put a lot of clubs off dealing with us in the future if we were to do this.

    Nice thoughts but if a deal isnt done we wont pass.

    I'm still 50/50 on it. I wont be suprised either way. If we were to pass I reckon it would say a lot of the new regime.

  • Quote

    I'm still 50/50 on it. I wont be suprised either way. If we were to pass I reckon it would say a lot of the new regime.

    Mate, Jack Viney is the player that typifies this new regime and has exactly the kind of qualities Neeld is trying to instill into the rest of the list. It would be madness passing on Viney and they won't do it.

  • Quote

    Mate, Jack Viney is the player that typifies this new regime and has exactly the kind of qualities Neeld is trying to instill into the rest of the list. It would be madness passing on Viney and they won't do it.

    Jimmy Toumpas is also that type of player, just faster and taller.

  • Quote

    Jimmy Toumpas is also that type of player, just faster and taller.

    Nowhere near as ferocious at the contest though, and is actually more of an outside runner than an inside wrecking ball. If we were to use pick 3 on Viney, Toumpas would be great at pick 4.

  • Quote

    Nowhere near as ferocious at the contest though, and is actually more of an outside runner than an inside wrecking ball. If we were to use pick 3 on Viney, Toumpas would be great at pick 4.

    Yes but Hogan is as ferocious, and taller and a KPF

  • Quote

    Yes but Hogan is as ferocious, and taller and a KPF

    I thought we were just talking about Toumpas?

  • Quote

    I thought we were just talking about Toumpas?

    We are talking about the player we will miss out on if we take Viney at 3, whether it be Toumpas or Hogan

  • Quote

    What combo would you prefer

    Viney + Toumpas

    Viney + Hogan

    Toumpas + Hogan

    I rate the combo in this order

    1. Toumpas + Hogan

    2. Viney + Toumpas

    3. Viney + Hogan

  • Quote

    If we were to make a deal I'd like us to use pick 4 for MD pick 2. If it's going to cost pick 3 it's overs I think, especially seeing as we have to wait another year for Hogan to even debut. Seeing as our midfield is a pile of dog poop, my preferred would be Viney and Toumpas with Stringer/Kennedy at 13. If a move is made on Hogan I'd like Viney, Hogan (pick 4) and O'Rourke/Kennedy/Stringer at 13.

  • Quote

    What combo would you prefer

    Viney + Toumpas

    Viney + Hogan

    Toumpas + Hogan

    I rate the combo in this order

    1. Toumpas + Hogan

    2. Viney + Toumpas

    3. Viney + Hogan

    I'd prefer

    Toumpas + Stringer + Kennedy + Viney......

  • Quote

    I'd prefer

    Toumpas + Stringer + Kennedy + Viney......

    As would I, that would be great.

  • Quote

    Mate, Jack Viney is the player that typifies this new regime and has exactly the kind of qualities Neeld is trying to instill into the rest of the list. It would be madness passing on Viney and they won't do it.

    I don't disagree with you in regards to the type of player Viney is and the fact we need those types of players.

    I reckon end of the day the question that the club will ask itself is who would we prefer, Viney or Grundy?

    And can we get a similar player to Viney later on in the draft? eg. Vlastuin at Pick 13.

    I'm not saying we will pass, I'm just saying I wouldn't be suprised if we did.

  • Quote

    No for two reasons.

    One being that I don't think we'll have to given I reckon that stuff will be sorted out behind closed doors between Melbourne, GC & GWS.

    And two and most importantly because it will send a huge message to the rest of the competition that MFC are not going to be dictated to by anyone. Everyone knows that Whitfield & Grundy are the two best players in the draft, so if GWS or GC wanted to play Russian Roulette and nominate Viney we should look them in the eye and simply say PASS. They are then left with a very good player, but not one who's rated in the top 3 in the draft when they have Picks 1 & 2. Those clubs would then have to answer for why a Whitfield, Gundy or a Toumpas has been let go purely to try and one up a battling club near the bottom of the ladder.

    As I've mentioned in another thread, I reckon a deal will be struck between the 3 clubs that will see a win, win, win.

    GWS to end up with picks 1,2 & 3 and take Whitfield, Grundy & Toumpas

    GC trade Pick 2 to GWS for MD Pick 1 (Jack Martin who will be an absolute jet!)

    Melbourne trade Pick 3 to GWS for MD Pick 2 (Jesse Hogan) allowing us to take Viney in the 2nd round and holding onto Pick 4.

    Surely if GWS or GC wanted to play russian roulette we could say "Tampering" rather than "Pass".

    Could we ask AFL to investigate why either of these clubs would compromise their lists for a lower ranked player?

    As an attempt at humour why are they interested in Jamar anyway????

  • Quote

    Yes but Hogan is as ferocious, and taller and a KPF

    No use having a kph if you can't even get it out of the centre

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Geelong

      "It's officially time for some alarm bells. I'm concerned about the lack of impact from their best players." This comment about one of the teams contesting this Friday night’s game came earlier in the week from a so-called expert radio commentator by the name of Kane Cornes. He wasn’t referring to the Melbourne Football Club but rather, this week’s home side, Geelong.The Cats are purring along with 1 win and 2 defeats and a percentage of 126.2 (courtesy of a big win at GMHBA Stadium in Round 1 vs Fremantle) which is one win more than Melbourne and double the percentage so I guess that, in the case of the Demons, its not just alarm bells, but distress signals. But don’t rely on me. Listen to Cornes who said this week about Melbourne:- “They can’t run. If you can’t run at speed and get out of the contest then you’re in trouble.

        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit.
      Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Gold Coast

      For a brief period of time in the early afternoon of yesterday, the Casey Demons occupied top place on the Smithy’s VFL table. This was only made possible by virtue of the fact that the team was the only one in this crazy competition to have played twice and it’s 1½ wins gave it an unassailable lead on the other 20 teams, some of who had yet to play a game.

        • Clap
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Gold Coast

      In my all-time nightmare game, the team is so ill-disciplined that it concedes its first two goals with the courtesy of not one, but two, fifty metre penalties while opening its own scoring with four behinds in a row and losing a talented youngster with good decision-making skills and a lethal left foot kick, subbed off in the first quarter with what looks like a bad knee injury. 

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Gold Coast

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 31st March @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons loss at the MCG to the Suns in the Round 03. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
      • 69 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All