Jump to content

Bring Back Brock?

Featured Replies

Posted

I know, he's a bloody tortoise and we're hurting for pace. But he was 2nd to Magner in the VFL last year and is still clearly playing well despite simply not being wanted by the Blues. Clearly on the outer at Carlton. Will have a year left on the deal, but we have so much cap space it wouldn't matter.

Offer them our bottom pick in the draft and bring him back? It'd be a role model for the young mids to look up to.

 

this is just what we do not need....Redrafting a plodder....there is a reason he cannot play for Carlton....the same should apply at the MFC.

Like the romantisism (is that a word) of the notion but is just too slow. We need outsiders with pace pace pace!

 

Don't you remember what he was like in his last 6 months?? Couldn't kick the ball inside the boundary line and had to come out before the start of the game to catch someone!!!

Why not Bruce too? Not getting a game. Hawthorn are failing to recognize his talents.


No. Brock can't get a game for Carlton. NEWSFLASH we are nowhere near Carlton. NOWHERE!

If Brock were on our list he'd still be one of our most important players.

Look at the possession count of matches so far. We are getting smashed. He can and will get the ball with ease. Get him back NOW

No. Brock can't get a game for Carlton. NEWSFLASH we are nowhere near Carlton. NOWHERE!

If Brock were on our list he'd still be one of our most important players.

Look at the possession count of matches so far. We are getting smashed. He can and will get the ball with ease. Get him back NOW

And if we settle for discarded plodders we NEVER WILL BE.

And if we settle for discarded plodders we NEVER WILL BE.

Let's just continue to produce superstars like the ones we have produced in the last 40 years... OH wait.

 

If you can graft Sam Blease's legs onto I'm all for it!


It's funny how you all hold such negative views on a player who:

A. Was one of our best before leaving

B. Would still be one of our best

C. Possesses onfield leadership we lack

D. Beat Tom Couch and James Magner in the VFL B&F despite playing less games

So what he can't get a game at Carlton. Name somebody in our current midfield who would!

Its funny, as I had a thought along similar lines. Looking at the number of players on other teams lists that have come from us,

I wondered to myself how many of them would be getting a game right now (obviously ignoring the fact we got picks/players for them):

Scott Thompson (yes)

Brock McLean (yes)

Darren Jolly (yes)

Simon Buckley (maybe)

James McDonald (yes)

Tom Scully (yes)

Kyle Cheney (maybe)

Cameron Bruce (yes)

Brad MIller (yes)

Addam Maric (no)

Obviously only hypothetical, and it wouldnt even automatically make us a better side (as we wouldnt have gotten players/picks for the deals

we made to get rid of these players).

Feel free to disagree, but right now I wish we still had a swathe of experienced players...

Go after Miller as well he had a dip on the weekend and towelled up Rivers.

Maybe I was watching a different game to you. Rivers played on and restricted Vickery to a handful of posessions did he not? Tom McDonald

to my eye was playing on Miller.

computersaysno.jpg?w=720

Without Vickery and Reiwoldt to play off Miller would not be a contributor. He has not improved. He is working in a different structure. Was only any good with us when he had a big teammate to take the main heat.

Its funny, as I had a thought along similar lines. Looking at the number of players on other teams lists that have come from us,

I wondered to myself how many of them would be getting a game right now (obviously ignoring the fact we got picks/players for them):

Scott Thompson (yes)

Brock McLean (yes)

Darren Jolly (yes)

Simon Buckley (maybe)

James McDonald (yes)

Tom Scully (yes)

Kyle Cheney (maybe)

Cameron Bruce (yes)

Brad MIller (yes)

Addam Maric (no)

Obviously only hypothetical, and it wouldnt even automatically make us a better side (as we wouldnt have gotten players/picks for the deals

we made to get rid of these players).

Feel free to disagree, but right now I wish we still had a swathe of experienced players...

Yes hypothetical, but surely the question is who would you want lining up for us - I would say Scott Thompson is a gun and a given, Brock - no, Jolly might be handy but is struggling, Buckley maybe, Junior is a hard one - we need the leadership, but disposal is still a) lollypop and B) ordinary; Tom Scully - Yes but most would choke on their Weeties, Kyle Cheney could teach us a few things about disposal but it would be without speed (would have him ahead of Bartram, Bennell etc. but forget the rest

Maybe I was watching a different game to you. Rivers played on and restricted Vickery to a handful of posessions did he not? Tom McDonald

to my eye was playing on Miller.

I thought I saw the same thing. Tom didn't have a great day, unfair to put that one on Riv.

I know, he's a bloody tortoise and we're hurting for pace. But he was 2nd to Magner in the VFL last year and is still clearly playing well despite simply not being wanted by the Blues. Clearly on the outer at Carlton. Will have a year left on the deal, but we have so much cap space it wouldn't matter.

Offer them our bottom pick in the draft and bring him back? It'd be a role model for the young mids to look up to.

You sound like someone who would back over their road kill!

Time to move on frenchie!

It's funny how you all hold such negative views on a player who:

A. Was one of our best before leaving

B. Would still be one of our best

C. Possesses onfield leadership we lack

D. Beat Tom Couch and James Magner in the VFL B&F despite playing less games

A. No he wasnt. Finished 10th in the B&F while playing 19 games. Was crud.

B. No he would be fighting with Magner. Has not been one of our best for six years

C Unfortunately doing wheelies,speed fines and being publicly drunk does not cut it

D. Paul Johnson won the Liston playing less games. And i dont want him.

Rather have Simon Godfrey. And I dont want him either.

Maybe I was watching a different game to you. Rivers played on and restricted Vickery to a handful of posessions did he not? Tom McDonald

to my eye was playing on Miller.

Agree. And given Richmond had 65 inside 50s and monstered us in the clearances, Miller with 2 gimmes out of 3 goals hardly impressed why would should have kept him.


We haven't stooped that low yet have we?

Aim higher son, I hear Tingay wants back!

 

I know, he's a bloody tortoise and we're hurting for pace. But he was 2nd to Magner in the VFL last year and is still clearly playing well despite simply not being wanted by the Blues. Clearly on the outer at Carlton. Will have a year left on the deal, but we have so much cap space it wouldn't matter.

Offer them our bottom pick in the draft and bring him back? It'd be a role model for the young mids to look up to.

Neeld wants to rebuild and Brock would not be in his plans

To do so would be going backwards

  • Author

Neeld wants to rebuild and Brock would not be in his plans

To do so would be going backwards

I'm not suggesting it as a long-term measure. It'd be a stopgap at best. We're hurting bad for onfield leadership, we've identified it clearly. But something similar - experienced player on the outskirts, although flawed - is almost certainly what we should be looking at to help the blokes onfield. I don't know if there is anyone around the league in a similar position to Brock - picked up a lot of games early in their career, and wanting one last crack - but if there are, to bring the blokes on and offer them some protection would be amazing.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Geelong

    "It's officially time for some alarm bells. I'm concerned about the lack of impact from their best players." This comment about one of the teams contesting this Friday night’s game came earlier in the week from a so-called expert radio commentator by the name of Kane Cornes. He wasn’t referring to the Melbourne Football Club but rather, this week’s home side, Geelong.The Cats are purring along with 1 win and 2 defeats and a percentage of 126.2 (courtesy of a big win at GMHBA Stadium in Round 1 vs Fremantle) which is one win more than Melbourne and double the percentage so I guess that, in the case of the Demons, its not just alarm bells, but distress signals. But don’t rely on me. Listen to Cornes who said this week about Melbourne:- “They can’t run. If you can’t run at speed and get out of the contest then you’re in trouble.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit.
    Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    For a brief period of time in the early afternoon of yesterday, the Casey Demons occupied top place on the Smithy’s VFL table. This was only made possible by virtue of the fact that the team was the only one in this crazy competition to have played twice and it’s 1½ wins gave it an unassailable lead on the other 20 teams, some of who had yet to play a game.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    In my all-time nightmare game, the team is so ill-disciplined that it concedes its first two goals with the courtesy of not one, but two, fifty metre penalties while opening its own scoring with four behinds in a row and losing a talented youngster with good decision-making skills and a lethal left foot kick, subbed off in the first quarter with what looks like a bad knee injury. 

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Gold Coast

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 31st March @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons loss at the MCG to the Suns in the Round 03. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 69 replies
    Demonland