Jump to content

Why the heck did we recruit Brian Royal back!?

Featured Replies

We exempt Neeld from blame for the debacle but we bake Royal when he has absolute dross (excluding Jones) to work with.

Demonland at its best.

I absolve him of nothing. Neeld is equally liable. But that doesn't change the fact that Royal's track record is ordinary.

 

Today I sat there at the game and for the 1st time I actually thought our midfield looks so slow and did think why is Royal coach. People are right when they said he stuffed up the backline that Wellman improved dramatically and when we got rawlings whose idea was it to move him to midfield. We should have cleaned out everyone and started frash or moved him to a admin job like they did with Josh.

We need someone younger and fresher but im not sure who. Maybe another robert harvey to help coach the midfield.

I was most surpised that of all the staff we kept choco. Cant say Ive ever been particualarly impressed by anything hes done, least of all now. Am obviously blind to his sublime talents, my bad !

Im not going to blame Neeld as hes not out there, he is accountable however and as the midfiled presence is non existant I have to ask wtf is choco up to ?

Im really at a loss to understand let alone fathom the minutae of what this band of rabble is up to..

Ive had more fun at the Dentist !!

 

We have gone backwards in all areas but its ironic that Royal is hung out by posters who wont have a clue to the extent of Royals involvement and exempts Neeld.

Neeld sets the game plan. Royal implements the midfield part. Aside from jones and possibly Trengove there is a complete absence of any class. I am not sure what a midfield coach can do with a complete absence of players with the requisite skill and class.

If only it was as simple as just sacking the midfield coach. Its isnt but I doubt you will figure it out.

I do know that at restarts after a goal, on several occasions, there were only 3 mfc players in the square - a 4th had to be called in (on 1 occasion, disastrously).

Sure this is a coaching thing? - Royal?

Whatever Royal's KPIs are, to the outsider, they seem to be non-existent.


We have gone backwards in all areas but its ironic that Royal is hung out by posters who wont have a clue to the extent of Royals involvement and exempts Neeld.

Neeld sets the game plan. Royal implements the midfield part. Aside from jones and possibly Trengove there is a complete absence of any class. I am not sure what a midfield coach can do with a complete absence of players with the requisite skill and class.

If only it was as simple as just sacking the midfield coach. Its isnt but I doubt you will figure it out.

Decent comment Rhino, just leave the last bit out. Remember you're a mod, with higher ideals to uphold. ^_^

We have gone backwards in all areas but its ironic that Royal is hung out by posters who wont have a clue to the extent of Royals involvement and exempts Neeld.

Neeld sets the game plan. Royal implements the midfield part. Aside from jones and possibly Trengove there is a complete absence of any class. I am not sure what a midfield coach can do with a complete absence of players with the requisite skill and class.

If only it was as simple as just sacking the midfield coach. Its isnt but I doubt you will figure it out.

Assuming you have an idea of Royals involvement, can it not be reasonable to suggest that he is not translating the game plan structures effectively enough? We are woeful at stoppages. There seems to be no communication or confidence in one-another.

If we cannot lay a fair portion of blame to a line coach then why the feck have him there to begin with.

Ed: structures

We exempt Neeld from blame for the debacle but we bake Royal when he has absolute dross (excluding Jones) to work with.

Demonland at its best.

We currently have 9 coaches. As RR points out it is not the coaching but the cattle we put out to play.Jones ,Magner are the only 2 that are putting in.Trengove is playing like a dog, and the others to pathetic to mention.It is a sad case but we are just not up to it.

 

Assuming you have an idea of Royals involvement, can it not be reasonable to suggest that he is not translating the game plan structures effectively enough? We are woeful at stoppages. There seems to be no communication or confidence in one-another.

If we cannot lay a fair portion of blame to a line coach then why the feck have him there to begin with.

Any chance you have any actual evidence beyond uninformed perception?

And if you are going bake Royal, how can you exempt the forward line and defensive line coaches?

And unless you are close to the FD how would you know just how each individual coach is going.

As JCB said we have nine coaches on the list.

So put down your torches and throw away the noose.

I have yet to read on D'and over an informed or constructive assessment of assistant coaches. And this thread continues the standard....sadly

Any chance you have any actual evidence beyond uninformed perception?

And if you are going bake Royal, how can you exempt the forward line and defensive line coaches?

And unless you are close to the FD how would you know just how each individual coach is going.

As JCB said we have nine coaches on the list.

So put down your torches and throw away the noose.

I have yet to read on D'and over an informed or constructive assessment of assistant coaches. And this thread continues the standard....sadly

I was merely sharing an assumption but thanks for answering a question with questions.

I'm not on here to bake Royal either and I know we don't have the most skilled set of midfielders going around.

A monkey dressed in silk is a monkey no less.


I mentioned this is the post match thread yesterday.

"Just thinking .... Common denominator. Brian Royal, 2011 defensive coach our defense turned to [censored]. 2012 mid field coach our mid field turned to [censored] "

There are obvious downers in every area he has coached !!

Miles Sewell is part of the solution I think. Definitely worth a punt with a late pick, it is bewildering to think that no one has picked him up in the last few years.

I mentioned this is the post match thread yesterday.

"Just thinking .... Common denominator. Brian Royal, 2011 defensive coach our defense turned to [censored]. 2012 mid field coach our mid field turned to [censored] "

There are obvious downers in every area he has coached !!

You're confusing causality with coincidence.

Miles Sewell is part of the solution I think. Definitely worth a punt with a late pick, it is bewildering to think that no one has picked him up in the last few years.

Clearly the 18 Recruiting Chiefs and the hundreds of talent spotters that work under them disagree with your opinions. But thanks for the offer Miles.

Apportioning blame for our current malaise cannot rest solely on one coaches shoulders. However, having said that clearly our biggest weakness at the

moment is our midfield, its structure and accountability is almost non existent right now. The senior coach has the ultimate say, so he needs to be held just

as accountable.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Royal is coaching poison. Last year he crucified our defence after Wellman had built up a good defensive unit. This year he has turned his attention to our midfield. The results speak for themselves.

You have a serious case of "rose coloured glasses" re Wellman - suggest you go back to the scoreline during his tenure - our defense leaked goals like no other during the entire Bailey era, including the time when Wellman was there.

Our biggest problem currently is we don't get first use of the ball ... EVER !!! Suggest this is a combination of Jamar's ineffectiveness so far this year as much as our midfield set-up


I miss when Brett Ratten was our midfield coach!

I was merely sharing an assumption but thanks for answering a question with questions.

I'm not on here to bake Royal either and I know we don't have the most skilled set of midfielders going around.

OK. So you dont know and you have not answered my question. Well done.

And your scenario about Royal is possible as are a number of others. But to assume your scenario is the case without evidence and then draw conclusions based upon that aint brainstorming.

Royal's first Assistant job was at the Dogs in 1998. In 1999 the Club didn't go as well.

He joined Melbourne in 2000. In 2001 we weren't so hot.

He had a year with the Roos in 2004. The Club's performance was down on the previous year.

Brian was with Terry Wallet as Right-Hand Man in his 5 year plan. Enough said.

He rejoined Melbourne in 2011 and had very limited success as a Backline Coach .This year doesn't look good for us. Our mids are performing awfully. Royal is now our Midfield Coach.

I can see a pattern here, of course it could all be mere co-incidence.

And yeah, he was Development Coach at St Kilda in 2010. In 2011 the Club, which had made the last two Grand Finals was eliminated in the first week of the finals.

apparently bart cummings trained a horse that finished last

apparently bart cummings trained a horse that finished last

And Norm Smith coached the Melbourne Football Club to 3 wins in seasons 1953 and 1966.


Our biggest problem currently is we don't get first use of the ball ... EVER !!! Suggest this is a combination of Jamar's ineffectiveness so far this year as much as our midfield set-up

First use of the Ball. Whatever it Takes....

We're stuck with him until his contract is done (end of this season???).

Agree though. Get someone in who actually played in premiership midfields and knows what they're doing.

P..s him off now The club could be out of business by the end of the year.Worst midfield in the league by far

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons head to the Red Centre to face St Kilda in Alice Springs, aiming for a third straight win to keep their push for a Top 8 spot alive. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 466 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 12

    Round 12 kicks off with the Brisbane hosting Essendon at the Gabba as the Lions aim to solidify their top-two position against an injury-hit Bombers side seeking to maintain momentum after a win over Richmond. On Friday night it's a blockbuster at the G as the Magpies look to extend their top of the table winning streak while the Hawks strive to bounce back from a couple of recent defeats and stay in contention for the Top 4. On Saturday the Suns, buoyed by 3 wins on the trot, face the Dockers in a clash crucial for both teams' aspirations this season. The Suns want to solidify their Top 4 standing whilst the Dockers will be desperate to break into the 8.

    • 235 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    The media has performed a complete reversal in its coverage of the Melbourne Football Club over the past month and a half. Having endured intense criticism from all quarters in the press, which continually identified new avenues for scrutiny of every aspect, both on and off the field, and prematurely speculated about the departures of coaches, players, officials, and various employees from a club that lost its first five matches and appeared out of finals contention, the narrative has suddenly shifted to one of unbridled optimism.  The Demons have won five of their last six matches, positioning themselves just one game (and a considerable amount of percentage) outside the top eight at the halfway mark of the season. They still trail the primary contenders and remain far from assured of a finals berth.

    • 12 replies
  • REPORT: Sydney

    A few weeks ago, I visited a fellow Melbourne Football Club supporter in hospital, and our conversation inevitably shifted from his health diagnosis to the well-being of our football team. Like him, Melbourne had faced challenges in recent months, but an intervention - in his case, surgery, and in the team's case, a change in game style - had brought about much improvement.  The team's professionals had altered its game style from a pedestrian and slow-moving approach, which yielded an average of merely 60 points for five winless games, to a faster and more direct style. This shift led to three consecutive wins and a strong competitive effort in the fourth game, albeit with a tired finish against Hawthorn, a strong premiership contender.  As we discussed our team's recent health improvement, I shared my observations on the changes within the team, including the refreshed style, the introduction of new young talent, such as rising stars Caleb Windsor, Harvey Langford, and Xavier Lindsay, and the rebranding of Kozzy Pickett from a small forward to a midfield machine who can still get among the goals. I also highlighted the dominance of captain Max Gawn in the ruck and the resurgence in form in a big way of midfield superstars Christian Petracca and Clayton Oliver. 

    • 9 replies
  • PODCAST: Sydney

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 26th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a crushing victory by the Demons over the Swans at the G. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.

    • 51 replies
  • POSTGAME: Sydney

    The Demons controlled the contest from the outset, though inaccurate kicking kept the Swans in the game until half time. But after the break, Melbourne put on the jets and blew Sydney away and the demolition job was complete.

    • 428 replies