Jump to content

Dean Bailey to Adelaide

Featured Replies

Just watch the 2 Collingwood games from 2010....Bailey did a great job, but with no FD to speak of he was unable to sustain it.

I am not saying he was perfect...But he did a tough job pretty well.

whats that got to do with "but as a teacher of Raw kids, Bails did a fine job"?.

 

whats that got to do with "but as a teacher of Raw kids, Bails did a fine job"?.

How many kids played in those 2 games?......Got a lot to do with it.

Without a Football department Budget how could he compete with the press Week after Week?? The List was Raw and Young when he took it over.

I am just looking at how far back he was when he first took it on....this club was dressed in rags by the end of 2007.

After the Geelong Debacle DB's senior tenure was over, but i do not under estimate what he has prepared for our new Football Departments.

WYL, I understand where you're coming from, but at the end of the day, coaches are judged on their win/loss ratio. There were so 'little' things he could have got right, but he was too unaware.

 

This is a very good thing for DB and for Adelaide. He's really much more suited to the assistant role. He should be much better value to them than he was to us.

How many kids played in those 2 games?......Got a lot to do with it.

Face it WYL, you feel sorry for Bails so you are making excuses and flimsy claims because he was a nice guy who got a dirty job but in the end was very average.

Where is all your tough bruise-free talk now? He was just a journey-man coach taking us no-where


WYL, I understand where you're coming from, but at the end of the day, coaches are judged on their win/loss ratio. There were so 'little' things he could have got right, but he was too unaware.

Not disputing that JR...live by the sword...yes, but what i am saying & should never be forgotten is how much of a handicap Bails worked under for his first 2-3 years...no other team has been as cleaned out as ours was, for that reason i cut Bails a little slack...and would be happy for him to work at the club again in an assistant capacity. Many Players have improved dramatically under Bails...kudos to that.

Bails will be back at the MFC in a few years i reckon....as an assistant.

WYL, this is sentimental nonsense. As Thomo said, he was sacked. The relationship has been terminated - full stop. The parting might've amicable with hugs and pats on the back all round, but our involvement with the guy on a professional level is over, for good.

FWIW I agree with you that he took a bullet for the club in 08-10 and for that reason I'm very grateful and pleased that he's been able to continue his career in footy at another club. That's got little to nothing to do with why he was dismissed though.

WYL, this is sentimental nonsense. As Thomo said, he was sacked. The relationship has been terminated - full stop. The parting might've amicable with hugs and pats on the back all round, but our involvement with the guy on a professional level is over, for good.

FWIW I agree with you that he took a bullet for the club in 08-10 and for that reason I'm very grateful and pleased that he's been able to continue his career in footy at another club. That's got little to nothing to do with why he was dismissed though.

you could be right of course....i still think he would make an excellent assistant in future with a fully funded Football Dept.

By accepting to take that Bullet in 08-10 shows he does have a lot of inner resolve. That i admire.

I am not trying to be sentimental at all...2011 was unacceptable.

Don't under estimate the good qualities Dean has got though, many people wouldn't have touched that coaching job in 2008...with the criterior it was given...Bails did it without flinching.

 

you could be right of course....i still think he would make an excellent assistant in future with a fully funded Football Dept.

By accepting to take that Bullet in 08-10 shows he does have a lot of inner resolve. That i admire.

I am not trying to be sentimental at all...2011 was unacceptable.

Don't under estimate the good qualities Dean has got though, many people wouldn't have touched that coaching job in 2008...with the criterior it was given...Bails did it without flinching.

You're being a bit sentimental about referring to 'that' coaching job in 2008....coaching an AFL is a fairly prestigious gig.

good luck to him


You're being a bit sentimental about referring to 'that' coaching job in 2008....coaching an AFL is a fairly prestigious gig.

Yes except the MFC 2008 gig was probably the least prestigious gig apart from the last Fitzroy tenure.

We had no money & no home at that stage.

He didn't do it for free WYL. He would have recieved well over one million dollars in his time at Melbourne, and there are plenty of qualified coaches that would have taken the job.

Face it WYL, you feel sorry for Bails so you are making excuses and flimsy claims because he was a nice guy who got a dirty job but in the end was very average.

Where is all your tough bruise-free talk now? He was just a journey-man coach taking us no-where

I don't feel sorry for Bails at all...i am just stating some background that people like to forget...as a senior coach he couldn't get out of 3rd gear...so he had to go..

But i still regard him very highly as an assistant coach....He has got Balls & that must be admired.

Good luck to him. Will always think positively about Dean. He did the right thing by our football club which in turn jeapordised his chances of success.

All the best.

Yes except the MFC 2008 gig was probably the least prestigious gig apart from the last Fitzroy tenure.

We had no money & no home at that stage.

You and I both know that there were several worthwhile suitors - the Club got it wrong with Bailey as a strategist, but got it right as a media performer and a good citizen.


He didn't do it for free WYL. He would have recieved well over one million dollars in his time at Melbourne, and there are plenty of qualified coaches that would have taken the job.

Yes & thank God it was Bails....imagine if Sheeds had been given the job....Our current list would be a complete shambles by now....Sheeds would have bought up on rejects for his gains...Bails put the club first.

I don't feel sorry for Bails at all...i am just stating some background that people like to forget...as a senior coach he couldn't get out of 3rd gear...so he had to go..

But i still regard him very highly as an assistant coach....He has got Balls & that must be admired.

now you are changing the context. We were not discussing his role as an assistant coach. Totally different kettle of fish

anyway, I sincerely wish him all the best in Adelaide as an assistant coach

Yes & thank God it was Bails....imagine if Sheeds had been given the job....Our current list would be a complete shambles by now....Sheeds would have bought up on rejects for his gains...Bails put the club first.

I agree Sheedy would have probably been worse for our club given where we were at the time

Its interesting reading old threads but Sheedy seemed to be the preferred choice on demonland and demonolgy at the time! A bullet dodged I think.

but that's just hypothetical and in the end Bailey's abilities are in the eye of the beholder

In fact all of our coaches get recycled in some shape or form.

Bailey at the Crows, Riley at Carlton, Daniher at WCE, Hutchison at the Tigers and Balme at the Cats. Northey got gigs after us and Barassi went to the Swans.

Riley was so in demand, he even got a job at Carlton whilst coaching for the Dees!

#neverforget

I agree Sheedy would have probably been worse for our club given where we were at the time

Its interesting reading old threads but Sheedy seemed to be the preferred choice on demonland and demonolgy at the time! A bullet dodged I think.

but that's just hypothetical and in the end Bailey's abilities are in the eye of the beholder

Agree with your comments right through this thread DC

After 3.8 years he lead us to a 186 point slaughter.

He was so good at his job he got flung.

I have seldom seen such revisionism on demonland.

The guy was an average coach at best.

The way he got rid of Jnr was an excellent example of his ability.

Time will tell if the young players are as good as some suggest.

But please he was not the saviour of the MFC.


I think we can mostly agree that he seems like a great bloke, but wasn't a particularly great coach.

You do not understand what went on during the years 2008-2010 do you.

The Job Bailey did was to the letter from the Board....Yes 2011 did not go to plan, but as a teacher of Raw kids, Bails did a fine job.

I have to wonder if you actually understand them.

He did do the Board's bidding to the letter and in 2011 they sacked him with a late night phone call after both Lyon and Schwab had publicly criticised him.

I cant see Bailey wanting to return nor any of the current Board or admin wanting him back.

It is really odd you think he will return. Extremely odd but in character.

I have to wonder if you actually understand them.

He did do the Board's bidding to the letter and in 2011 they sacked him with a late night phone call after both Lyon and Schwab had publicly criticised him.

I cant see Bailey wanting to return nor any of the current Board or admin wanting him back.

It is really odd you think he will return. Extremely odd but in character.

I serious doubt the board wanted him to produce a side that got done by 186 points after a number of high margin losses.

 

I have to wonder if you actually understand them.

He did do the Board's bidding to the letter and in 2011 they sacked him with a late night phone call after both Lyon and Schwab had publicly criticised him.

I cant see Bailey wanting to return nor any of the current Board or admin wanting him back.

It is really odd you think he will return. Extremely odd but in character.

How nice of you to return Rhino.I understand very well what happened....After a 31 goal loss, yes he was sacked...Had to be done..His senior coaching abilities had plateaued.

The right course was taken, Bailey would return in a few years in an assistant capacity if offered....He was very careful to not burn any of his bridges in public.

Fremantle on the other hand.....

How nice of you to return Rhino.I understand very well what happened....After a 31 goal loss, yes he was sacked...Had to be done..His senior coaching abilities had plateaued.

The right course was taken, Bailey would return in a few years in an assistant capacity if offered....He was very careful to not burn any of his bridges in public.

Fremantle on the other hand.....

I'd hardly call a 31 goal loss as plateauing......but I think I know what you meant :)


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 38 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies