Jump to content

Diamond_Jim

Life Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Diamond_Jim

  1. Agree That losing practice match between Casey and Coburg can't have been his best. Surprised that Spargo is a possibility after such a long lay off. His pre-injury form in 2023 wasn't stellar
  2. TC is the man this year Dee Zone. Bell our long time stand in when Verrall and Fullerton aren't available has gone elsewhere. With Tom Mac and Jeffo in the seniors plus the possibility of TC being held back as an emergency we could struggle against North
  3. Attendance numbers post covid for the competition have risen but mainly due to extra rounds, split rounds (round zero) and marketing of a few blockbusters. I suspect most home and way games are showing relatively stagnant attendance figures. Similarly TV audiences are up simply because we have 9 games per weekend that don't clash. I doubt that there's much more juice in the lemon unless you can increase the number of theatre goers and lets face it they were never coming out late on a Sunday against an absolute premier sporting event such as the F1 GP. It's all about the event rather than the game. (Just ask the racing clubs). A St Patrick's Day game (Jimmy's Game) might work but you would need to invest big in the hoopla and of course don't go up against F1. When LIV golf paid a DJ $2M plus to spin in Adelaide and even F1 said it wasn't within their budget you realise how things have moved on.
  4. You wonder who sets this fixture. An 11am start at Arden Street would have been a great prelude to the Docklands match but no we're at Casey Will be interesting to see how Spargo goes after such a long time out
  5. Makes sense but it does favour the big clubs who have much more to spend on the CEO not to mention sales staff, media dept etc. These days everything is about upsell. If you can get a member to buy $50 worth of product that's an extra $5M revenue for the bigger clubs.
  6. Is the CEO's salary within any form of cap? Given what the big clubs earn I assume they pay a lot more
  7. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    From an MFC viewpoint you want two Melbourne teams to kick away and establish themselves in positions 1 and 2. Hard to see that happening so ideally we want to see the interstate powerhouses lose which keeps the Melbourne teams including ourselves in the hunt for a top 4 spot. 16-7 could see a team top the ladder. It got Port second spot last year with the Swans on 17-6 being number 1. Another loss by Freo would please me
  8. Season starts in earnest next week. I was expecting a loss today but bitter that we lost a close one. North are stacked with talent but rarely put it together. This is simply a "must win" game
  9. You could say that but Coburg are traditional wooden spooners so it's a little worrying Anyway early days
  10. One knew it would end this way
  11. Torture to say the least
  12. Agree mate.. it's certainly a change from the usual conservative policy. We're probably a 30% chance of a win but if three of these debutantes become regulars in a winning team as the season goes on I'll be very happy
  13. Saudi Arabia is now confirmed as paying out the Foxtel/Telstra debt in return for a stake in Dazn. (For those interested Foxtel was effectively sold for nothing with foxtel and Telstra getting loans repaid. Not sure if they got interest if any on the loans prepaid). Similarly FIRB approval is imminent. Going forward an interesting comment from Dazn which could come true with Saudi money... DAZN has been known for buying up local rights deals in different markets across its near-decade long existence. However, during a panel discussion in Melbourne on Thursday, co-founder James Rushton signalled a change in strategy, noting the company’s desire now to control rights deals on a global basis. “One of the things that DAZN is looking to do as a business is to try and buy rights globally. We much prefer to own all rights in all markets,” Rushton said. https://www.theage.com.au/business/companies/foxtel-s-petrodollar-fuelled-sale-close-to-the-finish-line-20250312-p5lj02.html
  14. I agree that's the most likely but....
  15. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Out of interest do we play Richmond twice this year?
  16. Think he meant Langford...
  17. TMac is not your typical sub unless you are thinking injury sub. I think they're desperate for someone to back up Max but you could be right that in view of the weather they might go small. This game looks increasingly tough to win
  18. No surprises in the named 18
  19. You would not be happy if you missed the squad. Just released... so lets play which four drop out and who is the sub Jeffo definitely out and next TMac Billings for sub? or more likely Lindsay? Think Billings is in
  20. It does have one in the sense that you're not allowed to spend more than you earn. This is what has got Manchester City in trouble. In simple terms the League is saying that the sponsorship fee paid by the Middle East owners is greater than what would be paid by an arms length sponsor. (Of course the more powerful/popular the club the higher the justifiable sponsor fee. You could even argue a higher fee on the basis that the recipient club will use it to buy "name players" that will enhance your sponsorship. Clear as mud but perhaps clearer than F1 team spending caps.)
  21. His non-selection for the Freo hit out says it all. Jeffo will need a couple of decent Casey games. Would be handy if he could ruck.
  22. This is how strange the salary cap rules on sponsorships etc. can be. No wonder they're almost unenforceable From an article in today's Age on Petracca's change of management. He appears on YoPRO packaging in his Melbourne jumper and kicking a Sherrin football, so those payments must be lodged under additional services agreements (ASAs), which enable players to earn extra income beyond their base salary for promotional and marketing activities. Each club has a cap on the total amount it can spend on these agreements. However, Petracca also appears in a YoPRO Instagram video in normal clothes without any AFL “intellectual property”, such as a jumper or logo. In that case, the 29-year-old can accept money outside ASAs. https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/petracca-s-power-move-demon-splits-from-star-studded-connors-sports-stable-20250310-p5lieu.html Begs the question if Trac did his cooking show in an MFC polo would the revenue come within the salary cap. Where do you draw the line between genuinely leveraging your image as a footballer vs routing the salary cap. For those who are interested in these things the present investigation of Manchester City is a fascinating study.
  23. Diamond_Jim replied to Demonland's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Some background. The Age article contains a decent bit of background analysis She has worked with Team Petracca since August last year, supporting the Melbourne star’s wife, Bella Beischer, in securing some of his non-football commercial deals, particularly with his ever-growing cooking empire On Trac 5. They had worked together with D’Orazio and Connors Sports on some deals, but the switch to Scullie will streamline Petracca’s affairs. https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/petracca-s-power-move-demon-splits-from-star-studded-connors-sports-stable-20250310-p5lieu.html There's a whole new revenue source in the social media sphere. My feeling is that the mainstream managers don't really exploit it. Could even be a role for Tracc post football. Good luck to him
  24. Will be a pleasant surprise if we come away with a win. Personally I'm more concerned as to how we build into the first six week block. From a season viewpoint we need to come out 4-2 and at least 3-3. It's such an overly long season that pre-bye form is not that indicative. My greatest concern is that our bottom 4 and the next 4 at Casey need to push through. Next is the smalls to mediums in our back 6. Anyway let's see what 2025 has to offer. Lifting that cup would be lovely. PS: Hope Jefferson makes it
  25. If you're watching on a big TV.. 65" plus 4k is great. (it's not a chalk and cheese difference... think 20%) Your internet speed is more than enough. Give it a go and if you don't like it you can cancel/downgrade your plan easily if you're paying month to month