Diamond_Jim

Werribee forwards giving Casey a bath in that last ten minutes

Casey having a hard fought battle with Werribee

agree my other hope is that with Salem back and Rivers in form we look for the corridor kick every now and then. I would like to see one of Spargo, Kozzie or Chandler concentrating on being a corridor receiver

a restricted free agent as I understand it

It's an advertisment for games starting at 7:15 Few would have watched to the end

It's a big one tonight Go Swans (simply because I don't want a resurgent Carlton next week) Continuing on my what's best for us theme Wins by Hawks, Giants, Tigers and Suns would be good. Time to concede top spot to the Pies and back them to beat everyone but us. (Yes I hate it but it makes sense and 2 is as good as 1 in the top 4)

His time on ground is substantial but even when TMac is not playing at Casey they have to give forward time to Joel Smith and Jefferson. My guess is that it's between 70 and 80%

two of them usually would stay until the AFL game has started. In theory they could be at Werribee and warmed up in time to come on in the second half. This would mean Casey would be two players short for a half. All in all I can't see it happening

Someone left the cake out in the rain I don't think that I can take it 'Cause it took so long to bake it And I'll never have that recipe again Oh, no

Probably our biggest ever Pies supporters pay and they were likely quicker off the mark than ours. Not sure what the monetary return is from the AFL section but it must be good. An old article suggested we get 41% of the revenue at the MCG but how revenue is defined I have no idea

Harmes... a bit of a surprise

One problem is that all the apartment development profit goes to Racing Victoria. We'll need a first class community benefit story to get State/Federal money. Most of those have already been played by the other clubs but there may be one or two left

plus lovely fish and chips on the foreshore before the game !!

This is where the debate is but who replaces him? Smith... not the same type of player Do you play JVR in the TMac role and then play Smith or BBB in the deeper forward role. To win we need 5-6 goals from the small forwards (Kozzie, Chandler and Spargo) and the same from the three tall forwards. Then you get the remaining 4-5 from Petracca and the other mids giving you 15 odd goals. If one of these three groups fail you need someone to kick a bag by themselves. Realistically only Fritsch and Kozzie are capable of that effort.

Avalon airport oval We certainly aren't getting the old character filled grounds

This is what playing Collingwood when they are a game clear on top of the ladder looks like

El Matadore !! It's the new play

thumbs down

The problem is that the law is all about black letter law Nuance is not something it does well I'm back to rewatching Ballers

no.. he's Jeff G http://www.barristers.com.au/barristers/jeff-gleeson-kc/

It's the Matador movement Stand still.. swing your hips .. wave your red cape and allow the bull to charge past you.. Except that this Bull goes onto score Seriously though ... a two hour hearing on a relatively simple point.. This is beyond the Pale

Interesting comment by Gleeson.... Gleeson: It's an interesting question. Contesting the ball, if it becomes too remote from the act of trying to gather the ball, then almost everything is contesting the ball, including just bumping your opponent out of the way so you can pick the ball up.

Love it !!! Jeff Gleeson says Hunter is "an intelligent, articulate fellow who's got a clear view about what happened in this matter" and should stay for further questions if he can. Hunter: "I've got nowhere to be mate other than Saturday at the G'."

it's all in those "eyes" Hunter initially says he's "fairly sure" his eyes are on the ball for the whole duration of the contest, but on re-examination admits it is "slightly harder to tell" near the point of contact.

Gleeson refused to accept videos of similar incidents as it does not comply with the infamous Rule 5.5