Adam The God

We move on. Let's just back up our Geelong win next week.

1. Offer him $500,000. 2. He says he wants to go for more money. 3. They say no, but the seed has been planted. Maybe I'm still recovering from last night.

Give them something to think about.

Very interesting to hear that. Treloar is just as good as Shiel, IMO. I wonder what they're thinking. Have you heard whether it's in line with Shiel's deal?

Get Jack McRae. Gun. Okay, so he might have defensive deficiencies, but they can be worked on. Absolute ball magnet. Luke hasn't been playing him much at the Dogs. We should be approaching him now with a nice little package.

Totally. Has been pretty ordinary this year, IMO.

No, so what I did was pause the AFL site at the start of the last quarter and watched Jones' goal on the MFC website, then went back to the AFL site.

The most annoying thing about watching it on the AFL site is that Jones' goal at the start of the last quarter is missed for some bizarre reason.

I wouldn't be adversed to giving him another rest week, but totally happy either way.

Thought he was pretty complimentary of us in the four and a half replays I've watched.

I think in these situations our better players actually lift.

And Tyson is 22.

Christian To Be Honest Petracca.

So last week you'd given up and now we're a legitimate chance to make finals?

I think he copped a corky in the first term. As well as a forearm to the head from Steve Drunk-Driving Johnson.

I'm hoping Gawn can use that height of his to nullify NN.

He doesn't try to overkick them. That's his secret. That last goal against Richmond in the pocket was a perfect example. Not an easy angle, but made it look easy.

It's a no to Bastinac from me. Let's aim a it higher, especially as our currency as a destination should be a bit higher come season's end.

I don't think so. They both had some good games in their first season, but they weren't consistent, nor were their disposals damaging. If you look at Brayshaw, he's been damaging for the last month and he'll only get better in the second half of the year.

Agreed, Paul. But I think we'll go a little bit younger if possible. If we're giving up a first rounder, it'd be better if the age bracket was 21-23. It's almost not worth it otherwise.

You've gotta remember that there will be slippery conditions. Playing Gawn, Hogan and resting Spencer forward is already cramping that forwardline, to add Dawes we'll be too tall. Not to mention, talls may find it hard to pluck marks in those conditions. Of course, perhaps we don't need to mark as many, as long as our forwards bring the ball to ground.

Spencer is also really aggressive, which I like. I'd drop Dawes for this game.

I'm with you here, but I think we should play the two ruckman against West Coast. I'd consider bringing Dawesy back for the Essendon game. I think we have to be strategic in terms of our set up and take into account who our opposition is. As Roosy alluded to in his post match conference, the two rucks won't work every week, but I don't think we're any chance against West Coast unless we play two ruckmen. The following week we can go with Dawes or Pedo instead of Spencer.

Please explain, mate. Hope you're right. I'm just hoping we turn up. How's that for MFCSS?

Well, that's already happened really. We lost to St Kilda and beat Geelong in Geelong. I suspect this will happen again at least once this season.