RalphiusMaximus

It's a no from me. Old, injury-prone, too short. He's not what we need. If we go hunting for a forward at other clubs, I want to see 2m or more.

I can't believe that nobody in the media have hit on the obvious. We are now being coached by The Demon King!

Well, they fumbed that one. Literally. Hanks was the only player with clean hands all game.

Can someone explain to me why so many people wanted Buckley? He was a poor coach last time. He took over a side consistently playing finals and took them to the bottom. He was unpopular with the players. He never won a flag as a player or coach. What exactly does he bring to the table aside from a famous name?

It's normal if you keep winning

Why would we want him?

I am thrilled with this news. I was really worried that the club would be sucked in the Buckley talk. He would have been a disaster for our club. King came out of the most professional organisation in the AFL, has seen success as an assistant coach, has plenty of experience, and is reputed to have great people skills to build relationships with his players. I don't think we could have done better out of the crop available to us. Where is this quoted from?

So far the only delisting I have an issue with is Sestan. We're desperate for quality kicking and he was doing a great job before his injury. Definitely worth persisting with to see if he could adjust to AFL pace.

Do we want Buckley?

As a native Frankstonian, I can not dispute this sentiment.

And that's the game. Shocking umpiring. A lot of Melbourne-listed players put their hands up to make room on our list. A few showed us that they might be worth keeping.

Baldie gets tackled without the ball in the middle, no call again. Goal to Frankston.

Goal Laurie. One goal in it.

Kentfield hit high, no call. Frankston player hit high, called. Hmmmm.

11 points. Maybe five minutes left.