Rod Grinter Riot Squad

One of the best one-liners I've seen here!

That's 4 words.

Again you are bringing up incidents from his time with carlscum. Brisvegas knew what they were getting. Those responsible for recruiting him behaved worse IMO. They should be fired first.

Since he went to Brisbane what? Two of the incidents you quote are irrelevant. Was there proof he distributed the photo? No. Did anything AT ALL come out of the flashing investigation? No. So it's just the NY eve incident. Do you think your employer should have the right to fire you if you got into trouble for celebrating too hard on NY eve?

I actually feel sorry for Fev. Brisbane are the dogs here. Thank god we didn't get Voss. How wrong was I with my strong advocacy of him to be our coach. Both, they and he knew what they were getting with Fev. They gave away the house in what was the worst trade I reckon I've ever seen. Now they are sacking Fev for effectively not much. The Bignle pic? Is there proof it was him. The flashing? No case to answer. Gambling? Not on AFL, what's he done wrong here? NY eve? Not good, but it was NY and had absolutely nothing to do with the club. The lions have acted like 1st degree pr1cks here and that the AFL will help them is a load of dogs dirt. Hope Fev sues the pants off them and wins!

Not too bad of an idea. Hope you don't mind me stealing the suggestion and running with it. Not sure Skull will work like the others when the ball is kicked. Instead, I reckon each time Skully grabs the ball and set off running we should all be yelling out "Skull, Skull , Skull" in the great Aussie way, one Skull for each step maybe. Not only would it have the effect you're looking for, will probably lead to all Collingw&%$ and Tigers supporters being passed out by quarter time.

Not true at all you should say there HT. Robbo was confident he will remain a demon

Maybe the match review panel are trying to recruit Scully and reckon Junior could help??

How he performs in the B&F is a major factor in the formula.

Attention all geniuses wanting to play Scully at Casey if he has signed..... It would lessen the compensation we would get. Significantly. That said, I don't believe a word Eddie says and ignoring the hype as best I can

Great post. Hope every one reads it closely. Keyser, can I post this on demonology?

Love it, good on you Dean. About time those at the top stuck their necks out. Now we must follow.

I reckon the scarf looks fantastic, especially with the emblem sewn on it.

By my reading of this, we went our needs over the best available. Pretty much the best available does not equate to best available. BTW, I'm very pleased with what the club has done.

Sylvia must love it. 8th most votes yet gets in and has center stage...

History lesson for me? Hate to tell you, but he still didn't play. And if you call 2002 and 2006 teams as being successfull well then you're as soft as a supporter as Bruce is as a player. Check your scope...

It's not clear cut. That said, for me, I'm adament that we'll be better off without Bruce. He's disposal was iffy, put some pressure on him and we're in trouble. He got way too many, cheap and uncontested possessions by running into space behind the ball carrier and demanding it from his younger colleagues. They'll give it to their senior player, despite the fact more often than not they have better disposal. If Bruce tackled like Junior or put his body on the line when it counted, I think there'd possibly be a case to make. As it is, I consider us more likely to make finals now that Bruce is gone.

I think that we are more likely to play finals without Bruce. A fit Junior would make a difference but that's academic. I'm more than happy with the path the club is walking.

My God, what a load of tripe. Skill, well Bruce has heaps, very skillful with helicopter kicks and hospital handpasses... Jeff White, top 5 when he left. That's why other clubs came knocking for the ageing ruckman. He wanted to keep playing, but like Bailey 15 other AFL coaches could see that time had passed him by. Then you use Jolly as an example to back up the youth policy being a travesty. Clutching at straws there Champ. Jolly left due to too much time being given to the older ruckman.... LOVE THE WAY YOU HAVE SHOUTED ABOUT OUR LAST REMAINING LINK TO THE 2000 GF. History lesson for you .... Bruce didn't play. Green did though..... Oh but Bruce won a B&F when we were struggling. Good on him. He would never have won a B&F when we were doing well (especially post Guerra). As for Hale, the FD rated him at a certain level and stood their ground. I don't have blind faith in them, but neither am I blind...

Hell he used to yell on 'ology about how great Bruce was. Even bumped a few.

"It is understood Bruce was happy enough with a one-year commitment, even though the Demons were offering slightly less than what he wanted. But he also wanted assurances and positivity about his own place as the club embarks on a determined youth drive." Soft as they come. Hey Fanta pants, did you expect us to guarantee you a start regardless of how bad your disposal was?

As I said on 'ology. We can look forward to him hitting Demons players more regularly in the future. What a dog of an act, thought more of the money hungry grub and won't miss him haven't rated him since he did his shoulder and lost his balls.

My God you are either completely full of it or .... I asked where had you said who your back up option would be before I posed the question. Why don't you try look at the thread a bit closer and tell me that. You hadn't and are full of it. The 'proof' and 'evidence' are also examples of this.

Answered the question 5 times? No, you hadn't said who you'd play when I posed the question. There's a case to be made for using an undersized back up for a few minutes a quarter rather than wasting a spot on the list for someone who will contribute nothing. The point was made and you dismiss it with scorn. Then you have the nerve to whinge about "pissweak passive aggressive shots". What an amazing hypocrit! No need for evidence to be submitted in triplicate, but if one is to quote the evidence, then supply it. Unless of course you are making it up to support your argument, which obviously you are.

First we have: "That's exactly what you can do. It's proven that you're more likely to suffer soft tissue AND impact injuries while fatigued." Where has it been proven, or are you making things up to help your argument? Evidence? Where? or are you making this up to help your argument? BTW why are the AFL considering limiting interchanges to slow the game down due to worries over soft tissue injuries?