Rod Grinter Riot Squad

Me work for 9? LMAO. Yep I flew down from Coffs Harbour for the night. I've already told you in this thread that the segment was for the footy show, 3 days later and you continue with the "free to air" BS. You changed tact when you heard it was a heavy edit after claiming it was a light one and just criticised them for giving him a mic. Obviously comprehension is beyond you on the first reading so let me repeat, Fev is not in trouble for anything that was shown on the footy show.

They knock you back for a job? Nine didn't escape scott free, you're not the only person in this world who has to blame everyone. Nine got screwed by Fev, often the brownlow street talk is good value, this year it was pathetic as they showed the few short clips they could of Fev and nathan Brown's lame efforts to recover the segment. I like how you've criticised them for a light edit, found out it was more so and changed tact to it now just being for giving him a microphone. Love the consistency pal.

Choco playing games??

From what they said they showed very little of his street talk, as most of it was unsuitable. Again, I stress, he was in trouble before any footage aired... He was carted and making a fool of himself before the count was even half way through the season, nine can't be blamed for that.

It wasn't 'live' or close to it. They were filming a piece for a segment 3 days later. Fev was in trouble long before the show aired...

Mate, I too am enjoying the situation they find themselves in. The response was a bit rude sorry, but while I have no time for Channel Eddie I find it remarkable that anyone would blame them for what happened with Fev. Blame should first go to Fev. Then Judd and the Blues officials. Crown should be included. The AFL, nine, hell, even I should get some of the blame...

Blah, blah, blah... PSD?? Won't / can't happen. Channel 9 ? Blah blah blah. He'd done street talk before at the brownlow... What about the blues captain next to him and the officials at the table facing some scrutiny for letting him get in the state he was in as they sat there giggling. They are also the same tools who removed the behavioural clause from Fev's new contract, less than a year after they inserted one into his old contract. Carlscum have no interest in trading Fev IMO, they just want the world to think they do and that they tried to make a deal happen. How about Fev take responsibility for himself, it's not like he doesn't have a history of it.

That's exactly what we will be trying to do. We need some space, Carlton have shown a liking to some of our players and are said to be interested in Bell, so why not try give them him and pick 34 for pick 27? Can't hurt to try...

Wikipedia told you we are talking rubbish?

While technically we exchanged Thompson for pick, we effectively traded Thompson who wanted to leave for Moloney, a player we wanted and Geelong had to give us to get our pick from Thompson to land Ottens. A simpleton would say we let him go for a pick, so go ahead.

:lol: :lol: Sad thing is I think you are serious.

As I said elsewhere, hysterical child. Brock and Murphy may be different types of players, but only fools who rate Ward as a good kick would reckon Brock will be the more valuable of the two.

My God you are an hysterical child. The trade is a win. Brock was surplus stock. Bloody joke of a poster.

I've read it and laughed at those who weren't keen on it. That said, I've read regular posters here who claim that Ward was a good kick . It'd be fair to say that I don't pay much attention to what the majority think.

This trade is a huge win for the Demons. Good luck to Brock but not to his new team, provided we have some luck we'll look back at this trade thrilled as we have with Trappers.

Shades? C'mon Rogue. Jolly is way better than Jamar. I'd take pick 8 or 9 in a heartbeat, but there is no way Port would be that stupid.

Very good news. Would be happier if the contract was for 3 years though

I've seen little on game days to inspire me from Dean. Have said many times it remains to be seen whether he is the next Peter Rhode or the next Clarkeson. What i have seen - and loved - is his ruthlessness. To so clearly deliberately (IMO) not win games and give us picks 1 and 2 showed a ruthlessness not seen at Melbourne for a long, long time. I hold out high hopes for Dean, but the jury is very much out.

As bad as the umps are, you have to feel for them trying to officiate a game where the players are acting to a ridiculous degree.

Very well put Nasher

Ever thought Brock may be detrimental to the teams culture. His actions (not dollars) in the past have not necessarily been those of someone you'd build a culture around.

Very glad with this trade.

I've a huge amount of time for Brock and think he could be a very good player if he remains (sorry... can get) fit. That said, I'd do this trade in a heartbeat if I could. It would be a win for Carlscum, they need a player like Brock, we have Jones and Brent, 2 very similar players (and I'd keep these 2 above Brock), we'll have Scully and Trengrove coming in so IMO it's pick 11 for someone who may well turn out to be a peripheral player for us.

?? 2nd siren?? The grand final is replayed a week later. No overtime in the real thing.

Reckon I'll go for the Saints. The Cats have broken their drought and I was glad for them. Last year their supporters had their hearts broken and would like to see it again this year (where as last year I didn't). Saints fans are a long suffering breed, 'll be happy for the animals to have their time in the sun