daisycutter

you know (tracc marking it aside), if the umpire had paid holding/over shoulder/chopping arm then it would not be considered controversial, at the very worst a bit soft so much going on in that short contest mark, free kick, touched goal, all should have been to our favour yet punters want to shout controversial

and for filth supporters, biffo?

no, we would have taken brayshaw and lever

if we are talking about the good luck on tracc's leg break goal (or was it an off break), what about the bad luck of tracc not being paid the mark?

there is only one person who can say, and that was the goal umpire, and he was perfectly positioned. any one else is just guessing, the video vision is just not good enough besides, the real issue is why was tracc's mark not paid? why isn't media discussing that?

a MAY zing

can't we dream for a few more hours, ding? then we can join the meltdown on the "is goodwin the right guy...." thread

given most aints are illiterate and don't know how to post, these posters represent their elite..... say no more.

jones to tag jones?

is the only way fritsch can be disciplined is to punish the whole team also? doesn't seem a major indiscretion on the surface

yesterday's game, dorks vs bummers would have been interesting with team announced after game had finished ?

druggies tanking?

the catch-22 with these internet racist trolls is they do it for the publicity and the outrage it causes the normal anti racist solutions don't work with these trolls for these types a solution which denies them notoriety, publicity, disruption is needed. maybe something along the lines of any media condemnation from officials, clubs, media etc excludes absolutely any details......no screen shots, no disclosure of abuse content, no naming the perp's online moniker, no disclosure of the individual (other than "a player at club x") victim, quick removal of offensive material from social media and strong statements that all information has been turned over to the police who in turn give a commitment to seriously hunt down and prosecute these scum just a thought

deleted posted to wrong thread by mistake

i doubt he got dropped after 25 possessions, 16 contested, for football reasons......it just doesn't pass the pub test

as did don williams mfc > west perth > mfc

don't be so polite, luci. not hypocrisy....corruption the afl keep a tight noose on the media via accreditation and other means

agree his best is very good and can be a game breaker. does go missing often though still concerned about his history at 3 clubs

yep, as is clenched fist punches, throat punching, off the ball interference and dangerous tackles just hope for luck in not causing concussion (unless a big time player/club)

#freenibbler

or does he just do gil's bidding?

i struggle to see where the cost savings come from not only will they be flying/accomodating hundreds of players each week but this will need to include players not even on a club's primary list. for 2 complete teams will need in excess of 50 players just nowhere near enough detail to really evaluate

i guess this would also mean a mid season draft?

problem is contacts begin at end of October, so a 6 month contract basically means nov,dec.jan,mar,apr,may - not much actual football here

nope, the afl only owe a duty to the almighty $