daisycutter

so toss in a 4th rounder as well to make them feel better, no good to us antway

tom getting a contract for $400k at age 31 would be long odds i'd take $200k in hand rather than risk a resurrection in 3 years time at $400k p.s. no tax savings - all amounts off the top at top tax rate either way (unless playing funny buggers with other planned losses)

yep, at the age of 30 can't see any reason why he would drop 2 x $100k = $200k

is today a holiday for trade week?

$40M for only an increase of 4,000 seats makes sense ?

harmes, really?

nah, he's a whatever-it-takes fan

or round it to the nearest 30 and that makes it 60...........you know it makes sense

short answer: no long answer: nnnnnnnnnnnooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

an old saying.... be wary of filth bearing gifts

from above - seems opposite of what edmund said

of course that's all predicated on the belief that sam edmunds is not telling porkys and then there is bucks denying it, and then edmunds doubling down who to believe but certainly there's a big red flag blowing in the wind, regardless of what it is specifically

au contraire, big bad sydney and being virtually incognito could test his weakness for temptation

why, he's not a fa. trade time doesn't start till wed hold your horses

to be close to family?

smith was a dud overrated pensioner dodged a bullet mere shadow of his former self not worth 3 years or the money etc etc now i feel better

can't help but think there is much more to this story than is being made public

not sure about chop out, but he can certainly flop out with great results

just saw title of this thread.... thought it must be about uncle bitters..........disappointed

you need to relax a little bit and get your humourometer checked in for a service. i can't believe you spend so much time trawling old posts to find something to criticise no need to act like an ultracrepidarian

give it a rest, nev........................please

stinking bloody richmond! better than stinking bloody dangermouse, but

and more important CURRENT football knowledge no doubt other board members have some football background but a modern football department and players are so different from football in their time

certainly doesn't look like a way to cut costs