With the expected reduction of the interchange, it is expected the stock-ruckman role will change as far as the 2nd ruckman is concerned.
Rucks will change more often in the forward line than interchange bench, and this should suit the Russian. The Russian will probably ruck at least 2/3 rds of the time, meaning the 2nd ruck will spend 2/3 or more playing on the forward line. This is hardly the profile of a "stock-ruckman". We need a tall who can pinch-ruck effectively but knows how to play a tall forward role but in our case not a key-forward role. Furthermore this is a temporary role for a couple of years until our own young talls develop. I think the role of a traditional second ruck could be numbered if the changes go through. The FD seem to think they need this type of player.
So, is Hale the best available and affordable mature option going around?
This can only be answered if compared to the alternatives. Who are the alternatives? And not "stock-ruckmen" please.
I think Hale has shown the potential (for what we need) and is worth a risk, but obviously many others think he is a spud.
So lets discuss and compare alternatives
BTW I agree re the 3rd rounder + fringe player as the ideal price. North may even cover some of his contract salary??