daisycutter

You piqued my interest, Do tell me more (and don't hold back on the details) B)

My dictionary/thesaurus blew a fuse on that one

I thought we have just been doing that (exploring the option) and, it was a large "no thanks" - too much down-side for so little up-side May as well bring back the Reverend as bring back Trapper

3/ Dees will have plenty of extra vocal supporters - Power fans when playing Crows and then vice-a-versa

I just cant see MFC picking up Trapper no matter how "cheap". There again I cant imagine Juice getting an extension But what would I know

isn't it academic if we are not spending 100% of salary cap?? actual costs are still actual costs (bottom line)

I think this year we can take an extra 2 rookies - anyone confirm?

The Febey Bros. They improved as time went on. A bit like Jnr

Did Jamie Shanahan get a mention? Mind you I didn't have great expectations

Well call it what you like - personally I'll call it an emblem (for you and for me?) If that is a logo then the Australian Coat of Arms must be a logo too now I'll go he

Hmmmm, some confusing tautology there Clint. He might have been trying to simplify things but it just confuses it for me, YMMV but

Yeah, spelling Moloney as Maloney is just baloney boloney rubbish

The AFL link screen is too small for most of the logos/emblems anyway (the filth have an emblem too) Its icon size and not many logos look good/work at that extreme small size The AFL site would be better off using larger logo/emblems sizes or changing it too just team colours

Can't remember the name (Rod someone?) - help me out Was in the early 80's (maybe late 70's). Medium size forward - HF flanker Recruited from Aints - guy had off-field issues Could turn it on and could kick a bag. Classy when on-song, had big expectations Played a few ripper games, became inconsistent, left after a year (I think) went to a third club, but not much heard of after leaving dees

You're just being silly now E25, an annoying little [censored] but a great player Of course, he is an exception for someone so short in the modern game

Again, I disagree. Its an EMBLEM not a LOGO The club calls it an EMBLEM and that is good enough for me We should all adopt the clubs naming, there is no club logo just an emblem Lets stop calling the emblem a logo (it will avoid confusion too)

Hear, Hear ! Well put

well maybe it is semantics, but to me it is the club emblem and we don't have a "club logo", but we will have a "demons logo". thats ok for me - you don't have to have an official "club logo" - no big deal So, Club Emblem - YES Club Logo - NO Demon Logo - YES Logos for other things - YES (e.g. Tridents, Redlegs, Mates of Melbourne etc) Other new "specific" logos - POSSIBLY Nothing wrong with one club emblem and multiple specific logos What do you think?

Alan you keep referring to it as a L O G O The MFC site clearly announces and refers to it as an E M B L E M In this case the emblem is "designed" to tell a story, wheras, as you know, being a designer, a logo is "designed" to contain a simple (single?) message via a symbolic graphic, so I don't understand the concern The club has already hinted they are coming out with a new logo featuring the demon Why don't we hold off until the club complete their new branding (jumpers, logo etc) shortly

the aints weren't called the social club for nothing

Maybe they should ban "hide the soap" down at the Dorks shower rooms though

Dunno, those b@stards would still be running the sprinklers all night

g o o d decision you can get back to being cranky around March 2011 (or earlier if MN gets re-signed B) )

spot-on WYL - makes my blood boil almost as much as white away strips

Getting a little sensitive yourself there RPFC? B) We are seeing the withdrawal symptoms of demon addicts Unfortunately nothing can be done except cold turkey (and skin thickening) until next season