Jump to content

daisycutter

Life Member
  • Posts

    29,101
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

Everything posted by daisycutter

  1. Apologies to all posters Please ignore my last two posts re top sides trading in big names I didn't realise this was the Tom Scully thread which I self-banned from.....senior brain-fart Won't happen again
  2. They'd also played two grand finals previously. Anyway I thought your point was for 'premiership contender' teams. The point is.......top teams find a way......not excuses......and don't you let facts get in the way either
  3. I hope someone gives him a razor Wouldn't want him turning into another Travis 'Rasputin' Johnstone
  4. or.....its based on the trader not the tradee
  5. Jolly and Ball at the Filth say Hi!
  6. The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....The AFL never get it wrong...repeat after me....
  7. watts really struggled fitness-wise bb. I thought the conditions were just too much for him he looked totally shagged most of the time he obviously doesn't like high humidity
  8. Bit unfair there dee-luded I've not been too keen on Maric but he was very good last night His best game for MFC and very clean with the ball in difficult conditions
  9. Howe the sub surprises me, Tassie boys are generally good in wet conditions....
  10. yeah I agree. He's such a pedantic [censored], he's just saying he is 99.98% or in other words its not final until its all signed off. he'll stay
  11. hahaha wait till you see the Hogwarts neighbourhood but seriously, I'd watch at least the first movie before watching later ones
  12. source was 3aw, anyway i guess we wait and see....... wonder whether he is in adelaide or darwin at the moment? edit: i'm assuming port went up early like melbourne?
  13. You'll find a lot of bs here from time to time egd. Doubt anyone here has every seen an mfc contract let alone read one.
  14. NONE of the three senior reserves are named in Casey side, so no late night flight back to Melbourne.
  15. all pretty true, but i don't think its a big prob in afl and no worse than its always been theres really two types A] exaggeration or demonstrative. player enhances the offence he thinks is there to make umpire notice B] complete fabrication, just a straight out con. not much you can/should do about A] umpires should maybe get more involved with B]. maybe a warning or a free against. for worst examples the mrp could look at and probably fine for first offence I'm not very happy though at having a specific rule as I don't think it is that big a problem. as i said before the general 'disrepute' rule could always be used for really bad examples. the game is getting sanitised enough
  16. he should be fined but it is hard. look at soccer. you might pick (accurately) 1 in 5-10
  17. well the afl are saying that he wasn't suspended due to the staging and that contact (to the sacred head) was still there and the staging was incidental don't shoot me i'm just the messenger the afl are as weak as p155 on this one and you are right, someone was suspended over this and this confession at least casts doubt on at least part of the elements of the verdict and therefore must make the suspension unsafe but i thought we agreed this was the unaccountable-change-the-rules-to-suit-anytime-afl
  18. except tappy is replacing bennell and maric will be sub (replacing blease)
  19. Quite. It should be a cut and dry case However I think it is a stupid rule that is almost impossible to administer (as in soccer) They have the general 'disrepute' rule and this could be used for extreme breaches (whatever they may be?)
  20. [censored] off rpfc (in the nicest possible way) this is our haven....look it up in the dictionary if no-one posted in that 'other thread' there'd be just a little less bs in the world
  21. and I can see your logic too old dee however we need to get Aaron back in form and I thought Darwin being his home town might provide the right spark yeah I know he probably doesn't deserve it and we need to send messages to senior players etc
  22. if we lose this one now, D'Land will really go into meltdown
×
×
  • Create New...