daisycutter

and according to google images they commonly use a mid-blue and a light-blue logo

especially future picks upto 2 years out which have to be heavily discounted due to uncertainty

well so do i wish. but i was just talking of development trajectory, being a similar height and body profile.

yeah, expect he will have similar trajectory as sam darcy

don't think they make saunas that big, mr leg 🤣

yes, that is the convention If we had started with a proper year 0ad, then the 21st century would have been from 01/01/200 to 31/12/2000 which would have made more sense look, I understand the convention, but it is an interesting fact that we skipped a year in chronology by going from -1 to +1 and that is just plain maths this all started by me trying to warn off demonstone by pointing out it was a hoary issue and him being disparaging to others who could see that there is a legitimate area of confusion now i'll go back in my shell

no. time naming convention works at the end of the time interval how do you explain 12 o'clock is at the end of the 12th hour. is the clock label wrong? why is 1 second past midnight 00.00.01 when as you say it is in the first hour 01 but convention say 00

sorry, that was a typo, will try and correct

so @demonstone, I take it by your emoji reactions and your odd attempt at maths that you are not convinced?

nothing wrong with maths. -1 + 1 year is 0. (not 1) When old mate jc celebrated his 1st birthday and became a 1 year old the silly calendar clicked over to 2ad at exactly the same time. How could it be 2 years anno domini (after christ)? A contradiction, right? normal time convention is to measure at the end of the time interval. Look at a clock the 12 is positioned at the end of the 12 hour, not the start. Same with years, hours, minutes etc. the proscribed century convention (century ends on end of xx01) is at odds with normal time convention. It was just a convention to hide an anomaly caused by ignorance in the first place. don't blame me, you started this and i did warn you it was an old hoary chestnut

rather than it's a "fact" i'd prefer to call it a proscribed convention that just represents one "solution" to an accepted anomaly caused by the real fact that there is a missing year 1bc to 1 ad. i.e. -1 to +1 is 2 years not 1. that's the hoary bit

2? very generous, od

only coz the [censored] didn't proscribe a year 0ad tis not that i have doubts ... as i said the old hoary chestnut

that hoary old chestnut 😮

i'm still a wait and see on jeffo. need more convincing.