No right or wrong, but different ways of approaching things.
At the last Mates of Melbourne Bash the MFC football department spoke about the statistics re the average amount of experience contained within a premiership team and that they had on average 150 games under their belt. Given the hole that we have in the 24-28 years age bracket it is therefore unsurprising that their stated approach will be to get as many games into our developing players as quickly as possible.
This is not to say that they we can expect to see them all playing together at once. However from what was said I would expect to see quite a few of our younger players getting some game time towards the end of the season.
I can see the logic in this approach given where we are and where we plan to be.
Perhaps if we had a more balanced list (experience wise) than an approach more similar to Neil Craig's would be taken.
A hungover and frozen brain, and yet still quite insightful Jaded. Strauss delivering to you off a run from the half-back is a leading forwards wet-dream.
Had a look for you Mousey but the prices at this late stage are very expensive (and you'd have to fly in and out of the Gold Coast)
http://booking.tigerairways.com/skylights/...n/skylights.cgi
It's poor form from a Club Director...
But at the same time the entertainment value of a Hawk repeatedly dropping the "S-Bomb" on the radio is a pisser
The football department seem to be taking an exemplary approach to the players on-field & off-field development and welfare.
I'd expect that if the decision was made for Jack to debut it would be done so with the Watt's family blessing.
Hearing nothing but good things about Scully...mixed reports on Butcher, and does anybody know the name of the big (201cm) ruck prospect from Victoria?
yes, but its not a "stat" and if you:
a) only look at the newspapers, or
B) only watch games via the Tele, or
c) go to the games but are too thick to comprehend the contribution a player is making to the pattern of the game
Then you fall back on the stats...