Jump to content

BW511

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BW511

  1. BW511 replied to Pinball Wizard's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The long game strategy is an interesting one when you would think Bartlett, Pert, Mahoney, Richardson and Goodwin are all very much tied to exceptional results in the next 12 months. There must be a big fish we are loading up for next year but the ship may have sailed by then
  2. BW511 replied to Pinball Wizard's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I don’t think you’d really have to worry, he’s a 5 game per year prospect at best. He’s lucky to get 10 touches a game
  3. BW511 replied to Pinball Wizard's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Speaking of BigFooty, the talk there was that Lachie Hunter had a 4 week ‘2nd strike’ rest early in the year. Think there’s definitely a bit of a party culture out west, but good luck to them
  4. BW511 replied to Lord Travis's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Maybe we should enquire about Butler ?
  5. Plus, only 2-3 on the list would likely play every week.
  6. BW511 replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    May can do it, but he needs to be making the kick 45m-60m from our defensive goal, which he rarely gets the chance to do
  7. BW511 replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I like Salem as a player, but if I could have Saad or Houli instead, I’m taking it every day of the week. My point was less about Salem, more about the type of player. We are not a team which springboards from defence with precise and damaging field kicks. It is an area we could improve
  8. BW511 replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The Salem one is interesting, no doubt he’s a good player, but if we had a more line breaking/attacking version like Saad for instance, we would be a much tougher side to match up against. We have running backs, but we could do with some more attacking backs. Tom Stewart or Shannon Hurn type that sets up all the play with bold and smart kicking.
  9. BW511 replied to Pinball Wizard's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Speaking of Lockhart, anyone with inside information on where the hell he disappeared too? Few people on here got upset with him laughing within games - maybe the FD wanted to make him a scapegoat?
  10. BW511 replied to Elegt's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    And Merrett is a very neat kick
  11. BW511 replied to Pinball Wizard's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It’s an interesting point and probably reiterates the way the team plays from week to week. I am sure plenty of teams have [censored] off guys running around each week, but the best teams are able to continue to perform around it. It wouldn’t be the first time in history that a coach is chummy with a few guys and pretty nonchalant about the rest of the group. I’m sure anyone who has played a bit has experienced it first hand. You’d just expect better from a bloke at the highest level
  12. BW511 replied to Pinball Wizard's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Rohan plays as a hit up link man, exactly what Jacko will be doing this year. No thanks
  13. BW511 replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    He’s been shunted to HFF and rotating ruck, I’d leave too. He is a gun onballer, not a makeshift ruckman
  14. BW511 replied to Lord Nev's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    As mentioned, the issue with Tom is he won't fit in the 22, even if he does get fit and lean. Very expensive backup player to have on the books
  15. BW511 replied to Pinball Wizard's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    The whole trade period is such a snoozefest. Every fan wants miracles, the clubs all want to sell high and buy low. I still get sucked in every year, but there is never much movement between teams
  16. BW511 replied to Lord Nev's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I have seen the Richo role mentioned a few times regarding T-Mac, there's no chance that happens. T-Mac is an aerobic beast, but he isn't running away from a mid, or taking hangers and creating opportunities like Richo did.
  17. BW511 replied to Pinball Wizard's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Wasn't it discussed elsewhere that Smith was enticing because he did not cost anything? Makes sense if the eggs are in another basket with limited currency, but I don't have a lot of faith in Baker holding down the wing for a whole season and consistently contributing
  18. BW511 replied to Elwood 3184's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Bradtke seems to have been described as 'raw' for years. Will he ever shake that moniker?
  19. BW511 replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    If I was Dunkley, I'd happily take unders to not play ruck
  20. BW511 replied to Whispering_Jack's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Not bad for a bloke that has played about half a dozen mediocre games in 2 years
  21. BW511 replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    I agree with what you are saying, but our inability to develop players from within is why everyone gets so frustrated. No one will be able to convince me our depth is good when we regularly have 6-8 blokes in our 22 who contribute so little. We need to bring others in because what we have just is not good enough
  22. BW511 replied to Lucifers Hero's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    It's quite interesting that the pro T-Mac crew on here all gush about his performance in 2018 yet the sides looking to bring him in all seem to want him for defense. Opposition opinion on players is always a little more realistic
  23. I meant push him out of the side, would rather a genuine crumber to come in to give us Weid, Brown, Jacko, Kossie, rotating mid and a new nippy HFF. I’ve mentioned it before, it’s nothing personal, just the balance I would prefer to see
  24. Reckon Brown for Coleman is worth a few dollars when the betting opens up
  25. BW511 replied to dazzledavey36's post in a topic in Melbourne Demons
    Brown & Stephenson vs Brown & Melksham/Fritsch is much closer and on potential would be favourable.