Ethan Tremblay

Goddard: out of ten his face has a punchability of 9. Already mentioned is Daniher, I think he's just too ugly to punch. If I got close enough to punch him I think I'd just end up staring at him, getting caught in his ugliness.

I always tip the winner but change my tip at the last second as well. I only watched the first half due to having to watch paint dry but the Hawks appear cooked. Hard to write them off completely but so far they're not a very convincing top 6 team. Three of their wins were only by a few points or less.

He'd not long turned 27 in 2014 when he signed his last extension which was for 3 years. At the time he was in career best form. Different to Vince and Cross who had come from other clubs and were in their late twenties.

Dunns form was good when he re-signed, unfortunately the club can't see into the future when they extend players contacts. Nothing wrong with Tom McDonald, he could just do with some support down back.

Tigers to Beat the not-tanking tanking Dockers in the west. Essendon to beat The Saints. GWS to beat the throwers by 10 goals.

Maybe roll him out for the Queens Birthday game..

I reckon there'd be a fair few getting around the club IT.

2016 stats: Dazzle: 1 GNF: 0

Rhys Mathieson for Rising Star nom this week?

No worries, I must have posted that just before the teams came out.

O-Mac in Garland out?

Wish I could be at the game to see Trenners run out on Sunday.

McDonald actually isn't as bad as what people perceive, it's how bad his poor disposals are which makes it seem much worse, ie straight to an opposition player. drdrake mentioned Salem and Vince in his post so here's their disposal efficiency for the 2016 season along with T Mac's. Salem 74% Vince 68% T Mac 83%

All very good considerations. Some have mentioned Dawes, I agree that if he can't get on the park he'll be gone at the end of the season. If he can get a run, I wouldn't be against trying him down back. Slightly heavier that Robbie Tarrant but could see him playing a similar role in defence.

Don't know if Hurley would be a replacement for Hogan. He'd be played in the backline.

Would obviously be dependant on whether or not Hurley goes somewhere purely for the money, I don't imagine we would be offering the most (if we are interested). I can't see us landing both, if we land one, imo, it would be Prestia. His family after all, does supply fruit to the club.

With the reduced rotations and the AFL looking at reducing them further the club needs all the quality mids it can get.

It's better than the cubic zirconia defence we used under Neeld.

Sam McClure has a massive hard on for both those teams so it's not surprising he suggested them.

Best of luck to the big Rough.

He's on 6PR nightly and has an unhealthy obsession with Hogan.

He also bought a penthouse in New York.

He's contracted until the end of 2017. He will get a compensation payout. He might want to leave the club he trusted who injected him with substances they've forgotten the names of. He's likely to earn double what's he's on now. He'd be treated as a DFA in resepcts of the compensation Essendon would get, which is none. He would still get to the club of his choice.

He's not a free agent.. If he chooses to walk out on the club because of the breach of contract by the EFC he would be treated as a delisted free agent, meaning Essendon wouldn't get compo. Because of this whole 'saga' he can just walk out. I'm trying to be as basic as possible here.

He'll re-sign within the next couple of weeks.