ManDee

Versi estis omnes vosmet ipsos Edit: - ME QUOQUE

and may decrease the cake of your first pooch in future years. I'm in trouble that was the only bit that I understood.

Carlisle will be hair tested upon his return from the United States but it is understood that alone will not be enough for him to register a strike under the illicit drugs policy. He will be target tested by the League though if his hair test returns a positive result, following an admission of "inappropriate behaviour" and a video that depicted him snorting a white powder. http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-10-23/saints-plot-carlisle-punishment-as-he-returns-from-overseas-trip "but it is understood that alone will not be enough for him to register a strike under the illicit drugs policy." Why? Surely a positive test is a positive test. Edit: remove some bold type

I think the assumption the lad is making is that he is taking into account bids on academy players.

You can't get away with that Red. Proof source? Edit:- Judd drafted in 2001. 14 years times 10 top tens = 140 players =approx .72% chance and a lot of other good players have been picked up in top ten picks since 2001 So i think the report was wrong. On the second point from Judd 2001 until 2008 76% of the top ten have played over 100 games.

No doubt he will be tested on his return to Oz. Including hair samples. I would be very suspicious if he has shaved down like Cousins. Still may be more to come on this one.

No just very anal. But I will give you a B+ for being prompt and neat.

BB I think you missed my point. Could this draft have been better for the MFC? The only true answer is yes. As for an A grader - I am not suggesting we didn't try but we didn't succeed. So it could have been better. As for the dead wood (unproductive employees ) some still on the list IMO. We did a swap on a delisted player Fitzy so one can only presume those remaining on the list have a greater value and therefore could be traded for late pick or part of another trade. So it could have been better. Don't get me wrong I think they did a great job and I am a hard marker, so it could have been better. B+ with a gold star. Edit: If the A grading did not include the phrase - "couldn't have been better", and used something like "One of the best trade results for a team this year" then I would give them an A. As if my score means anything.

http://giphy.com/gifs/history-head-exploding-oaPcDncoLfgjK Edit:- Do not open if your name is Picket Fence

Sorry to upset your lunch. I have changed it to an exploding alien head, I hope that is OK

What?

Is he obstinate?

Edit : Removed scanners exploding head on request.

I was going to change my rating from B to A but stopped myself why? Couldn't have gone better, Yes it could, we could have landed an A grader, we could have moved out more dead wood. so B it is. And a very good B well done JM and team.

Memo to StKilda FC 3 Points to consider. 1 If it looks too good to be true..... it is. 2 Do not deal with the EFC. 3 Understand due diligence:- An investigation or audit of a potential investment. Due diligence serves to confirm all material facts in regards to a sale. 2. Generally, due diligence refers to the care a reasonable person should take before entering into an agreement or a transaction with another party.- Particularly the EFC

What a fwit. Do not photograph or write anything you don't want the world to see. This must be taught to the players, how could you be so stupid as to do this? Particularly an EFC player who must have had extra education on drug related issues over the last few years. Unbelievable.

I feel like a kid in a lollie shop, too many choices, and they all look good.

I stand corrected. I just stupidly parroted what someone told me.

We are now seeing why Mahoney is the only person remaining from the previous administration. I can see what he has done but I'm not sure how he has done it. Well done JM and team. I am excited about our team for next year. Go dees Edit: The Mahoney first statement is wrong.

OK Mahoney haters, eat some pie.

We won't trade picks No.3, No.10: MahoneyI like it when he lies.

GWS now have pick 7 - Treloar Edit: - Trying to work out what that means to us.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-10-21/indicative-draft-order-your-clubs-provisional-picks-as-trade-period-unfolds Edit : sorry first link was a dud

Thanks MC that makes sense.

If the AFL have poorly worded it I think my suggestion could be tried. Edit: Anyhow we will will the flag and it will be pick 18 anyway. Go Dees.