The Essendon Football Club wanted to know what substances former rookie player Hal Hunter believed he had been injected with during the club's 2012 supplements program, a court has heard.
Barrister Arthur Moses, SC, representing Hunter, told the Supreme Court on Thursday that the club's request was "silly" given they were the ones responsible for administering the program.
.
.
.
Mr Moses said Hunter, a contracted player with the Bombers from December 2011 before being delisted in September 2013, did not know what was exactly in the substances injected into him and "it's a basic human right to know what was put in your system". Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/essendons-coy-supplements-answer-is-labelled-silly-in-court-20151029-gklt8a.html#ixzz3pvWSsSSi
The EFC asked the player what they had administered him! Are they for real?