ManDee

The confusion between their, there, and they're occurs because the three words are pronounced in very similar ways. If the word means "belonging to them," use their. If you're able to replace the word with "they are," usethey're. Otherwise, there is only one correct answer: there. Or, http://www.grammar-monster.com/easily_confused/there_their_theyre.htm

If you can replace your with you are then it is always you're not your. - You're (you are) annoying people when you get this wrong. Your is possessive as in belonging to. - Your name is unusual. (You are name is unusual is wrong.) This is not hard. To or too . If you mean also it is too or excessive is too. Too far. I am going too. This is harder to explain than I thought. Best I stop now.

The reason I listed Pedersen was that we swapped Gysberts for him. That was a win for us.

jnrmac, they don't have to rate 16yo's what you trade is a pick in the next years draft. All picks in any draft are a lottery and you don't know who is available until it is your turn to pick anyway.

Jack, do you think before you post? I think our current coaches and list management team are doing a good job. Some examples below. 2014 Brayshaw Petracca Stretch Neal Bullen O Mac Vanderberg Garlett Frost 2013 Salem JKH Vince Cross Tyson 2012 Hogan Viney Kent Pedersen

Seriously? Your defence is that the deal has not been done and yet you say the club is weak as [censored]. I presume for the deal they have not done.

It sucked me in too.

What about Matt Rosa WCE for a few years? peter ryanVerified account‏@AFL_petryan Can see the logic in @WestCoastEagles Matt Rosa seeking opportunities elsewhere. Deep mid, could be a bernie vince type move 24 Matt Rosa Height 191 cm DOB 23-11-1986 Weight 84 kg Debut 2005 Games 2015 17 Career 168 Goals 2015 3 Career 39

I did it a few weeks ago, still kicking myself.

Making moonshine?

Nice new name by the way Gawnski.

OK praha would you swap our draft picks for Geelongs p/ups? Tell the truth, Morton, Gysberts, Cook or Dangerfield Selwood & Henderson. The draft is a lottery GFC are buying known products not a lucky dip.

Last year it is reported we offered pick 2 & 3 for Dangefield. Geelong get Dangerfield Selwood and Henderson. Would they improve our side? Yes. Would we offer what they have offered? I hope so. If we had snared those three players this site would be in meltdown talking about our next flag. I think GFC have been shrewd. They have lost players and they have picked some up rather than wait on the lottery that is the draft. I envy their selections.

Would you swap their ins for ours? I think yes is the answer.

Carlton seem to be the suppliers of forwards to other clubs, and yet they don't keep any. WTF

I bought a steam cleaner from one of those buy now and get these steak knives ads and the steam cleaner is shyt (never used) and the steak knives still get used (also shyt) I hope that clarifies things.

That's what happens when you search style & wookie

looks like that scum bruised his elbow.

Good to see remorse from the bitter one, shows how big a man he is. I've heard quite large, but that may be bragging.

Collingwood acquaintance says that they view Kennedy like we view Toumpas.

How rebellious of you.

Tell him he's dreamin.

The reason I suggested next years draft was that it would be subject to the WADA findings and next year hopefully it will be a later pick than 25.

It is possible that it is next years second round pick - subject to WADA. We pay overs but next years and without risk. Mahoney did say a second round pick. Thats what I would do.

Mahoney said a second round pick. Perhaps next years after the WADA findings have been finalised. I would say YES if that is the case.