Everything posted by Mickey
-
Plenty of time for that later in the week. Give him the full week and a half from the PF to recover before potentially testing him out. -
Fair enough. I thought they were the emergencies, make sense they are in red to get involved.
-
Because he's not playing? I think he is just still going through rehab
-
Sam Edmunds starting to get on board with Cerra to the Dees. https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/09/18/sam-edmunds-trade-update-on-cerra-lobb-clark-and-more/ "I struggle to see how Melbourne would go to the trouble of being the only other club to compete with Carlton for his services if they didn’t have a plan in place or a possibility of getting the deal done. When you look at it, it has to involve a player.” “Clearly Adam Cerra believes it’s possible because he hasn’t said ‘I’m definitely going to Carlton'".
-
I'm really looking forward to Geelong going all out trying to win a flag, falling short and losing all their young players due to lack of opportunity
-
It was interesting that someone (maybe Barrett) said Bont will beat Trac in the brownlow due to the goals he kicks... he's kicked one more!
-
While it's not great Gus couldn't train, you couldn't have asked for a better player to have chatting to the crowd.
-
It's not going to make up for no crowds at our big games and no Alice game, but it'll help. As would winning the flag
-
Spargs for me. Look for him go have 4-5 direct goal assists and kick 1 or 2 himself. And still not smile.
-
I've heard it just covers the first year of Cerra's contract
-
Just think how many #positivelingers keepcups that could buy!
-
Hope that's accurate. Media going on about how we've played one match in 28 days, and a am easy one at that. The Dogs/port game was a lot softer than ours, and then two weeks without a hitout. Could work in our favour big time.
-
Tom and Garry (maybe all of SEN) were counting down the days with interviews with people who wore that number, or related to. Say 12 days to go, Todd. 11, Sam Stynes.
-
-
Gotta give Sam credit, at least he is trying to be creative rather than dismissing it out of hand like other journos.
-
We have no key forward depth. Wouldn't be surprised if Weid signs on for 12 mths if he gets no significant interest
-
Papley. Again under contract but couldn't get home.
-
How is it an insult when none of those you mentioned are available? I would have Lyon over Daisy, primarily because she is a current player. But claiming having her present over a bunch of people who can't present doesn't make sense.
-
I agree he cherry picks, and he changes his mind every week. But if he hadn't in this case, which conclusion would have changed? The PF result. Which gives me confidence perhaps the Dogs win in rnd 19 is being overblown in importance. I hope the odds are indicative of what will happen in 2 weeks. It would be a good result for us.
-
Pretty sure one of the podcasts (may have been the RealFooty podcast) said Cerra wasn't chasing 750k, that's just what Freo offered for him to stay. He'll apparently take less to come home. It may be tricky, but I agree we wouldn't be in this if we couldn't get it done. Could someone like Hunt be on the move? Surely he'd get us a second rounder.
-
Recency bias, even when the Dogs game was only 24 hrs after ours. I am never confident on the Dees winning. I am now
-
-
Doggies can have it, provided we win the ones that matter. Hell, the Bont can have the Brownlow and the Norm Smith provided Gawn and co get the other 23.
-
I take it these aren't the official ones? Planning to have it framed if we win.
-
Interesting listening to David King on SEN today, for those who are all in on the dogs. They beat us in rnd 19 by 20 points. The expected score (I know, strange stat) for that game had it as a draw. They also scored the lost points ever from forward 50 stoppages. That won't happen again. So, if we score at at least the AFL average and don't let them score a record for forward 50 stoppages, we win. The dogs won't beat us. Only we can lose this.
