Jump to content

Mickey

Members
  • Posts

    2,764
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mickey

  1. Me whenever Dazzle posts Hun article
  2. Only if they pay half his wage and kick in the next 3 Pick 1s
  3. I thought you were in a bit of a roll 😂
  4. The Bombers will either want to get ahead of the bid for Kako, or push 9 into a 2025 f1 pick. Getting 13 doesn't help them
  5. I thought this too initially, but the more I think on it, the more I like it. Yes, it was a throw away line from Lloyd, but that's not really how it's being reported. And if it was figurative, I don't mind if it means they have to correct themselves and be more literal, which would then become 'No, he hasn't cleaned out his locker because he's leaving.' Great, so what proof do you have he is still trying to get out. And I think the answer is none, or at least nothing new. For the record, I'm not one of those who thinks this whole thing is a media beat up. But I do think the last couples days has been them trying to keep this alive. And if this shot from Green makes it harder, good on him
  6. Sounds like a metaphor to me, I.e. he's checked out and doesn't want to come back.
  7. Carlton get it for f1 and f2
  8. So this was the start of that info about essendon trading 9. "Essendon will look at ways to push up the board from their No.9 spot to get ahead of a bid on Next Generation Academy talent Isaac Kako, but will also consider pushing back down the order or shifting picks into next year."
  9. Interesting. I thigght they'd try to get ahead of it, rather than push the pick to next year. If we could make that work, it'd be awesome.
  10. This. The Oliver trade is the only sensational thing happening at the moment. Of course its going to get air time
  11. It was in relation to Daicos getting 38 brownlow votes and not winning. He then went on to say they Congratulate Pat Cripps for winning. It was a good moment from him, but unlikely to change Collingwood fan behaviour.
  12. No I'm not. If you think the melts are limited to DL, that's definitely not the case
  13. You can use 12 ft ladder on age article. Copy pasta the url and it will 'clean it up' for you
  14. Have just listened to Max on Triple M this morning. He didn't say much, except that he'll support Clarry no matter what, but he did say he's sick of the leaking from the club and we need to get on top of it
  15. This is [censored] bananas
  16. The program may be closely scripted, but anytime you have a room full of unhappy supporters it's going to be unpredictable.
  17. Cats will only pay full amount if draft cost is lower, or will only pay higher draft cost if Dees kick in some salary relief (duh). Cats biding their time, our public position on a trade hasn't changed, and we may still keep Oliver. He wants to leave but a trade will be hard. Any trade complicated by Smith trade
  18. Can anyone summarise please? Is it the club urging him to attend?
  19. Given they seem to be urging him to go to the BnF to potentially farewell the fans, you'd have to think it's not a positive outcome
  20. Yep, it's a risk either way. I just think it's a greater risk offloading him and effectively admitting we are done contending for a while, than not.
  21. Because, from the reports, the transgressions this year aren't to the same level as last. Are they isolated? Clearly not. But if he can have even the semblance of an uninterrupted pre-season, and get back to 80-85% of the player he was, you'll get much more for him than we will. The questions is whether it's worth it to stick with him for another 12 months. I think it is, others don't. That's fine. But if we trade him out without a quality replacement in the midfield, we might as well start the rebuild now.
  22. But all this year did was tank his value. The choice is to move him out for chips now, or hope he can cash in on his seeming better attitude (but acknowledging its still not great) and doing a preseason to then trade him for at least some semblance of value. Unless he is having an absolutely toxic effect on the group, why would you throw him out for nothing? It will kill our list going forward
  23. Sorry, but this is not a normal employer/employee relationship. Just offloading him for peanuts has the potential to set this club's list back years, and frankly I'm not interested in sitting where we were from 2007-2017 again. If the club believes they need to trade him, either it's for a decent return or we make it work for 12 mths and try to maximise his value. You don't just offload a guy to the detriment of your own position
  24. Given the club said they didn't know about the meeting, I don't think Pert did. Geelong seems to be off Clarry's own bat, probably due to previous interest and an understanding that they could help support him with his issues.
×
×
  • Create New...