Stats File - 2025 edition

all the stats that matter

Monday at 23:163 days

16 hours ago, jnrmac said:
v GC 85pts
v Crows 77
v NM 119
v Blues 70
v StK 90
v WCE 139
v Dogs 99
Your stat is padded by the smackings we gave North and West Coast.

If this is referring to me, you’re helping me out. We’ve quietly enough put 85 on GC, 90 on St Kilda (who love to stifle their opponent) and 99 on the Dogs (bad defence but a much better side than us overall). Plus everyone gets to play the bad sides (and whilst we got North twice, we got smacked by them the first time).

My point really is that I doubt many on here would think of our 2025 as being high scoring to the point of being 10th overall.

Quote

Monday at 23:403 days

Author

12 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:
If this is referring to me, you’re helping me out. We’ve quietly enough put 85 on GC, 90 on St Kilda (who love to stifle their opponent) and 99 on the Dogs (bad defence but a much better side than us overall). Plus everyone gets to play the bad sides (and whilst we got North twice, we got smacked by them the first time).
My point really is that I doubt many on here would think of our 2025 as being high scoring to the point of being 10th overall.

I think jnr was responding to my post that we have averaged 92 points in our 7 games since the bye

But your point remains valid, everyone gets to play the bottom sides. And besides our high scores in the game against the roos and Eagles was a function of our method and being attacking.

Is also note that that strech of games included our game against the blues which was played in wet and windy conditions.

I5s interesting that we are 10th for total scores but are also 18th for accuracy.

That inaccuracy could well have been the final nail in Goody's coffin.

Quote

Tuesday at 06:373 days

On 10/08/2025 at 21:10, WheeloRatings said:
Melbourne v Western Bulldogs (Round 22, 2025)
https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_match_stats.html?ID=20252206
Key Team Stats
Stats in bold were won by Melbourne.
Stat
For
Against
Diff
AFL
Disposal Efficiency
Disposal Efficiency
73.9
75.3
-1.3
72.4
Kicking Efficiency
66.5
68.4
-1.9
65.9
Territory/Attack
Time In Forward Half
44.6
55.4
-10.8
Inside 50s
47
62
-15
Shots At Goal
25
31
-6
Scores Per Inside 50
51.1
48.4
+2.7
44.6
Goals Per Inside 50
31.9
24.2
+7.7
23.7
Marks Inside 50
10
14
-4
Transition
Chain To Score %
23.3
27.3
-4.0
20.7
Defensive 50 To Forward 50 %
26.5
36.7
-10.1
22.8
Defensive 50 To Score %
10.2
20.0
-9.8
9.6
Defensive Half To Forward 50 %
32.0
46.7
-14.7
31.0
Defensive Half To Score %
14.7
23.3
-8.7
12.8
Contest
Contested Possessions
139
137
+2
Ground Ball Gets
86
98
-12
Post Clearance Contested Poss
88
84
+4
Post Clearance Ground Ball Gets
61
58
+3
Contested Marks
12
11
+1
Clearance
Total Clearances
31
46
-15
Centre Clearances
10
19
-9
Stoppage Clearances
21
27
-6
First Possessions
44
42
+2
First Possession To Clearance %
63.6
85.7
-22.1
74.8
Defense
Intercepts
59
58
+1
Intercept Marks
16
14
+2
Tackles
50
49
+1
Tackles Inside 50
10
13
-3
Def One On One Loss %
21.4
37.5
-16.1
27.2
Ruck
Hitouts
52
30
+22
Hitouts To Advantage
15
8
+7
Transition stats measure how often chains result in a score or an inside 50. Chains include all kick-in chains, all clearances, and intercepts with at least one disposal in the chain.
Chain To Score %: proportion of all chains that resulted in a score.
Defensive 50 To Forward 50 %: proportion of all chains starting in the defensive 50 that resulted in an inside 50.
Defensive 50 To Score %: proportion of all chains starting in the defensive 50 that resulted in a score.
Defensive Half To Forward 50 %: proportion of all chains starting in the defensive half that resulted in an inside 50.
Defensive Half To Score %: proportion of all chains starting in the defensive half that resulted in a score.
Player Ratings
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Match
TOG
Max Gawn
6.8
4.5
8.3
3.7
23.2
87%
Harrison Petty
2.9
4.9
4.8
6.1
18.6
78%
Jai Culley
7.0
1.4
1.9
3.5
13.8
73%
Harvey Langford
1.8
2.1
4.3
5.2
13.4
79%
Daniel Turner
5.9
1.4
0.7
3.9
12.0
88%
Jake Bowey
2.4
3.0
2.5
3.9
11.9
81%
Jake Melksham
5.1
0.6
6.6
−0.6
11.7
77%
Tom McDonald
3.4
2.5
3.3
2.4
11.6
95%
Kysaiah Pickett
2.4
4.9
2.8
0.5
10.6
86%
Christian Salem
2.8
1.1
1.7
4.6
10.3
87%
Judd McVee
1.7
2.8
3.9
1.6
9.9
75%
Jack Viney
0.2
0.2
5.7
3.5
9.6
82%
Clayton Oliver
0.3
3.5
2.2
3.7
9.6
81%
Trent Rivers
3.4
3.6
1.3
0.7
9.0
85%
Bayley Fritsch
2.9
0.7
4.5
0.7
8.8
83%
Christian Petracca
3.2
1.1
4.2
0.1
8.6
83%
Jed Adams
0.8
1.6
3.3
0.9
6.6
86%
Kade Chandler
0.2
0.9
5.2
−0.7
5.6
90%
Blake Howes
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.2
5.2
24%
Jacob van Rooyen
2.4
1.5
0.6
0.4
4.9
66%
Caleb Windsor
1.5
0.6
3.2
−0.3
4.9
70%
Tom Sparrow
0.5
1.9
1.3
0.0
3.8
54%
Ed Langdon
−0.4
−0.8
0.0
3.4
2.2
89%
Contested Possessions
For
Against
Diff
Melbourne's Defensive 50
Hard Ball Get
2
7
-5
Loose Ball Get
19
22
-3
Contested Mark
2
1
+1
Gather From Hitout
3
1
+2
Contested Knock On
0
1
-1
Free For
3
1
+2
Total
29
33
-4
Melbourne's Forward 50
Hard Ball Get
1
1
0
Loose Ball Get
9
9
0
Contested Mark
4
1
+3
Ruck Hard Ball Get
2
0
+2
Gather From Hitout
2
2
0
Contested Knock On
3
2
+1
Free For
2
1
+1
Total
23
16
+7
Post clearance
Hard Ball Get
10
15
-5
Loose Ball Get
51
43
+8
Contested Mark
12
11
+1
Contested Knock On
6
5
+1
Free For
9
10
-1
Total
88
84
+4
Pre clearance
Hard Ball Get
9
11
-2
Loose Ball Get
16
29
-13
Ruck Hard Ball Get
7
0
+7
Gather From Hitout
14
6
+8
Contested Knock On
2
2
0
Free For
3
5
-2
Total
51
53
-2
Official data on pre- and post-clearance contested possessions are not available. These have been estimated by Wheelo Ratings and should be indicative.
Ground ball gets are inclusive of hard ball gets and loose ball gets.
'Free For' does not include free kicks to advantage or free kicks while in possession of the ball as these are not counted as contested possessions.
Expected scores
xScore
Score
xWin %
xMargin
Margin
Swing
Melbourne
93.6
99
26%
+5.7
Western Bulldogs
105.3
105
74%
+11.7
+6
Shots
Score
Accuracy
xScore
+/-
xSc. /
Shot
Shot
Rating
Overall
Melbourne
25
15.8 98
60.0%
93.6
+4.4
3.74
+0.18
Western Bulldogs
31
15.12 102
48.4%
103.3
−1.3
3.33
−0.04
General Play
Melbourne
13
6.5 41
46.2%
50.9
−9.9
3.92
−0.77
Western Bulldogs
16
7.7 49
43.8%
56.0
−7.0
3.50
−0.44
Set Position
Melbourne
12
9.3 57
75.0%
42.6
+14.4
3.55
+1.20
Western Bulldogs
15
8.5 53
53.3%
47.3
+5.7
3.15
+0.38
xWin %: win probability based on expected scores.
Swing: difference between expected margin and actual margin.
xScore: total expected score from all shots taken.
+/-: total score above or below expected score.
xSc. / Shot: average expected score per shot. This represents the average shot difficulty.
Shot Rating: average score above or below expected score per shot at goal.
Notes: Expected scores are calculated by Wheelo Ratings. Each shot at goal is assigned an expected score based on the distance from goal, shot angle, and type of shot (e.g. set shot, general play following contested possession, general play following uncontested possession, ground kick, etc) as a proxy for pressure. The model does not take into account factors like the player, whether the ball was kicked with their preferred or non-preferred foot, and pressure on the player when taking the shot. Rushed behinds are excluded from actual and expected scores.
Territory (time in zones)
Region
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Match
Season
Half
Forward
41%
42%
50%
45%
45%
52%
Defensive
59%
58%
50%
55%
55%
48%
Region
Forward 50
19%
18%
23%
13%
18%
25%
Attacking Midfield
22%
24%
27%
32%
26%
27%
Defensive Midfield
24%
29%
25%
29%
27%
25%
Defensive 50
35%
28%
24%
26%
28%
23%
Source: Calculated by Wheelo Ratings.
Score Sources
Summary
Score Source
Score
Against
Diff
Kick-in
2.1 13
1.1 7
+6
Centre Bounce
1.2 8
3.1 19
-11
Stoppage (Other)
3.1 19
1.6 12
+7
Turnover
9.5 59
10.7 67
-8
Score Source
For
Against
Match
Season
Match
Season *
Kick-in
13
4.7
7
5.1
Centre Bounce
8
12.5
19
14.4
Stoppage (Other)
19
20.7
12
20.7
Turnover
59
46.4
67
48.5
* Against season average represents average points conceded by Melbourne across the season, not average points scored by Western Bulldogs.
Chain start region
Note: region is from the scoring team's perspective.
Region
For
Against
Match
Season
Match
Season *
Defensive 50
25
13.2
26
17.8
Defensive midfield
26
16.3
23
20.2
Centre bounce
8
12.5
19
14.4
Attacking midfield
27
25.4
20
24.8
Forward 50
13
17.0
17
11.5
* Against season average represents average points conceded by Melbourne across the season, not average points scored by Western Bulldogs.
Points from defensive half
For
Against
Match
Season
Match
Season *
51
29.5
49
38.0
* Against season average represents average points conceded by Melbourne across the season, not average points scored by Western Bulldogs.
Centre Bounce Attendances
CBAs
CBA %
2025 %
2024 %
Clayton Oliver
30
88%
72.1%
70.7%
Max Gawn
28
82%
85.5%
85.0%
Jack Viney
24
71%
67.2%
69.1%
Caleb Windsor
22
65%
12.1%
0.0%
Kysaiah Pickett
14
41%
71.9%
33.0%
Christian Petracca
10
29%
67.7%
55.8%
Jacob van Rooyen
6
18%
13.4%
17.8%
Christian Salem
2
6%
1.7%
12.3%
Trent Rivers
0
0%
17.6%
29.9%
Harvey Langford
0
0%
10.4%
Tom Sparrow
0
0%
6.6%
37.7%
Ed Langdon
0
0%
3.3%
0.7%
Kade Chandler
0
0%
1.2%
0.0%
Judd McVee
0
0%
0.5%
6.3%
Harrison Petty
0
0%
0.4%
7.5%
Daniel Turner
0
0%
0.2%
0.3%
Jake Melksham
0
0%
0.2%
0.0%
Jai Culley
0
0%
0.0%
30.9%
Tom Fullarton
17.2%
Aidan Johnson
13.9%
Matthew Jefferson
1.0%
Xavier Lindsay
0.4%
Bailey Laurie
0.0%
11.0%
Charlie Spargo
0.0%
4.2%
Koltyn Tholstrup
0.0%
5.7%
Ruck Contests and Hitouts
Ruck Contests
Ruck
Contests
RC %
2025 %
2024 %
Max Gawn
75
75%
82.1%
81.1%
Jacob van Rooyen
16
16%
14.7%
17.6%
Harrison Petty
9
9%
2.4%
7.9%
Daniel Turner
0
0%
0.3%
3.1%
Clayton Oliver
0
0%
0.1%
0.0%
Tom Fullarton
20.5%
Aidan Johnson
15.6%
Matthew Jefferson
1.1%
Hitouts
Ruck
Contests
Hitouts
To
Adv.
To Adv. %
(2025)
To Adv. %
(2024)
Melbourne
Max Gawn
75
42
12
27.3%
27.9%
Jacob van Rooyen
16
6
2
32.8%
24.7%
Harrison Petty
9
4
1
26.6%
24.4%
Daniel Turner
0
0
0
50.4%
Tom Fullarton
43.8%
Aidan Johnson
21.1%
Matthew Jefferson
0.0%
Opposition
Tim English
73
23
6
Sam Darcy
11
4
2
Aaron Naughton
1
1
0
James O'Donnell
1
1
0
Rory Lobb
13
1
0

Stat	For	Against	Diff	AFL
Disposal Efficiency
Disposal Efficiency	73.9	75.3	-1.3	72.4
Kicking Efficiency	66.5	68.4	-1.9	65.9
Territory/Attack
Time In Forward Half	44.6	55.4	-10.8
Inside 50s	47	62	-15
Shots At Goal	25	31	-6
Scores Per Inside 50	51.1	48.4	+2.7	44.6
Goals Per Inside 50	31.9	24.2	+7.7	23.7
Marks Inside 50	10	14	-4
Transition
Chain To Score %	23.3	27.3	-4.0	20.7
Defensive 50 To Forward 50 %	26.5	36.7	-10.1	22.8
Defensive 50 To Score %	10.2	20.0	-9.8	9.6
Defensive Half To Forward 50 %	32.0	46.7	-14.7	31.0
Defensive Half To Score %	14.7	23.3	-8.7	12.8
Contest
Contested Possessions	139	137	+2
Ground Ball Gets	86	98	-12
Post Clearance Contested Poss	88	84	+4
Post Clearance Ground Ball Gets	61	58	+3
Contested Marks	12	11	+1
Clearance
Total Clearances	31	46	-15
Centre Clearances	10	19	-9
Stoppage Clearances	21	27	-6
First Possessions	44	42	+2
First Possession To Clearance %	63.6	85.7	-22.1	74.8
Defense
Intercepts	59	58	+1
Intercept Marks	16	14	+2
Tackles	50	49	+1
Tackles Inside 50	10	13	-3
Def One On One Loss %	21.4	37.5	-16.1	27.2
Ruck
Hitouts	52	30	+22
Hitouts To Advantage	15	8	+7

	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Match	TOG
Max Gawn	6.8	4.5	8.3	3.7	23.2	87%
Harrison Petty	2.9	4.9	4.8	6.1	18.6	78%
Jai Culley	7.0	1.4	1.9	3.5	13.8	73%
Harvey Langford	1.8	2.1	4.3	5.2	13.4	79%
Daniel Turner	5.9	1.4	0.7	3.9	12.0	88%
Jake Bowey	2.4	3.0	2.5	3.9	11.9	81%
Jake Melksham	5.1	0.6	6.6	−0.6	11.7	77%
Tom McDonald	3.4	2.5	3.3	2.4	11.6	95%
Kysaiah Pickett	2.4	4.9	2.8	0.5	10.6	86%
Christian Salem	2.8	1.1	1.7	4.6	10.3	87%
Judd McVee	1.7	2.8	3.9	1.6	9.9	75%
Jack Viney	0.2	0.2	5.7	3.5	9.6	82%
Clayton Oliver	0.3	3.5	2.2	3.7	9.6	81%
Trent Rivers	3.4	3.6	1.3	0.7	9.0	85%
Bayley Fritsch	2.9	0.7	4.5	0.7	8.8	83%
Christian Petracca	3.2	1.1	4.2	0.1	8.6	83%
Jed Adams	0.8	1.6	3.3	0.9	6.6	86%
Kade Chandler	0.2	0.9	5.2	−0.7	5.6	90%
Blake Howes	0.0	0.0	0.0	5.2	5.2	24%
Jacob van Rooyen	2.4	1.5	0.6	0.4	4.9	66%
Caleb Windsor	1.5	0.6	3.2	−0.3	4.9	70%
Tom Sparrow	0.5	1.9	1.3	0.0	3.8	54%
Ed Langdon	−0.4	−0.8	0.0	3.4	2.2	89%

	For	Against	Diff
Melbourne's Defensive 50
Hard Ball Get	2	7	-5
Loose Ball Get	19	22	-3
Contested Mark	2	1	+1
Gather From Hitout	3	1	+2
Contested Knock On	0	1	-1
Free For	3	1	+2
Total	29	33	-4
Melbourne's Forward 50
Hard Ball Get	1	1	0
Loose Ball Get	9	9	0
Contested Mark	4	1	+3
Ruck Hard Ball Get	2	0	+2
Gather From Hitout	2	2	0
Contested Knock On	3	2	+1
Free For	2	1	+1
Total	23	16	+7
Post clearance
Hard Ball Get	10	15	-5
Loose Ball Get	51	43	+8
Contested Mark	12	11	+1
Contested Knock On	6	5	+1
Free For	9	10	-1
Total	88	84	+4
Pre clearance
Hard Ball Get	9	11	-2
Loose Ball Get	16	29	-13
Ruck Hard Ball Get	7	0	+7
Gather From Hitout	14	6	+8
Contested Knock On	2	2	0
Free For	3	5	-2
Total	51	53	-2

	xScore	Score	xWin %	xMargin	Margin	Swing
Melbourne	93.6	99	26%			+5.7
Western Bulldogs	105.3	105	74%	+11.7	+6

	Shots	Score	Accuracy	xScore	+/-	xSc. / Shot	Shot Rating
Overall
Melbourne	25	15.8 98	60.0%	93.6	+4.4	3.74	+0.18
Western Bulldogs	31	15.12 102	48.4%	103.3	−1.3	3.33	−0.04
General Play
Melbourne	13	6.5 41	46.2%	50.9	−9.9	3.92	−0.77
Western Bulldogs	16	7.7 49	43.8%	56.0	−7.0	3.50	−0.44
Set Position
Melbourne	12	9.3 57	75.0%	42.6	+14.4	3.55	+1.20
Western Bulldogs	15	8.5 53	53.3%	47.3	+5.7	3.15	+0.38

Region	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Match	Season
Half
Forward	41%	42%	50%	45%	45%	52%
Defensive	59%	58%	50%	55%	55%	48%
Region
Forward 50	19%	18%	23%	13%	18%	25%
Attacking Midfield	22%	24%	27%	32%	26%	27%
Defensive Midfield	24%	29%	25%	29%	27%	25%
Defensive 50	35%	28%	24%	26%	28%	23%

Score Source	Score	Against	Diff
Kick-in	2.1 13	1.1 7	+6
Centre Bounce	1.2 8	3.1 19	-11
Stoppage (Other)	3.1 19	1.6 12	+7
Turnover	9.5 59	10.7 67	-8

Score Source	For	Against
Match	Season	Match	Season *
Kick-in	13	4.7	7	5.1
Centre Bounce	8	12.5	19	14.4
Stoppage (Other)	19	20.7	12	20.7
Turnover	59	46.4	67	48.5

Region	For	Against
Match	Season	Match	Season *
Defensive 50	25	13.2	26	17.8
Defensive midfield	26	16.3	23	20.2
Centre bounce	8	12.5	19	14.4
Attacking midfield	27	25.4	20	24.8
Forward 50	13	17.0	17	11.5

For	Against
Match	Season	Match	Season *
51	29.5	49	38.0

	CBAs	CBA %	2025 %	2024 %
Clayton Oliver	30	88%	72.1%	70.7%
Max Gawn	28	82%	85.5%	85.0%
Jack Viney	24	71%	67.2%	69.1%
Caleb Windsor	22	65%	12.1%	0.0%
Kysaiah Pickett	14	41%	71.9%	33.0%
Christian Petracca	10	29%	67.7%	55.8%
Jacob van Rooyen	6	18%	13.4%	17.8%
Christian Salem	2	6%	1.7%	12.3%
Trent Rivers	0	0%	17.6%	29.9%
Harvey Langford	0	0%	10.4%
Tom Sparrow	0	0%	6.6%	37.7%
Ed Langdon	0	0%	3.3%	0.7%
Kade Chandler	0	0%	1.2%	0.0%
Judd McVee	0	0%	0.5%	6.3%
Harrison Petty	0	0%	0.4%	7.5%
Daniel Turner	0	0%	0.2%	0.3%
Jake Melksham	0	0%	0.2%	0.0%
Jai Culley	0	0%	0.0%	30.9%
Tom Fullarton			17.2%
Aidan Johnson			13.9%
Matthew Jefferson			1.0%
Xavier Lindsay			0.4%
Bailey Laurie			0.0%	11.0%
Charlie Spargo			0.0%	4.2%
Koltyn Tholstrup			0.0%	5.7%

	Ruck Contests	RC %	2025 %	2024 %
Max Gawn	75	75%	82.1%	81.1%
Jacob van Rooyen	16	16%	14.7%	17.6%
Harrison Petty	9	9%	2.4%	7.9%
Daniel Turner	0	0%	0.3%	3.1%
Clayton Oliver	0	0%	0.1%	0.0%
Tom Fullarton			20.5%
Aidan Johnson			15.6%
Matthew Jefferson			1.1%

	Ruck Contests	Hitouts	To Adv.	To Adv. % (2025)	To Adv. % (2024)
Melbourne
Max Gawn	75	42	12	27.3%	27.9%
Jacob van Rooyen	16	6	2	32.8%	24.7%
Harrison Petty	9	4	1	26.6%	24.4%
Daniel Turner	0	0	0		50.4%
Tom Fullarton				43.8%
Aidan Johnson				21.1%
Matthew Jefferson				0.0%
Opposition
Tim English	73	23	6
Sam Darcy	11	4	2
Aaron Naughton	1	1	0
James O'Donnell	1	1	0
Rory Lobb	13	1	0

There it is, in all its glory.

59 points from turnover, 51 points from chains starting in defensive half.

These would have to be season highs Wheelo?

Quote

Tuesday at 09:053 days

2 hours ago, layzie said:
There it is, in all its glory.
59 points from turnover, 51 points from chains starting in defensive half.
These would have to be season highs Wheelo?

It's our equal highest points from defensive half after we also had 51 points against West Coast last week. It's our fifth highest points from turnover:

12.10.82 v Syd, R11
11.5.71 v WC, R21
10.4.64 v NM, R18
9.8.62 v Bris, R10
9.5.59 v WB, R22

Quote

Tuesday at 09:503 days

Author

40 minutes ago, WheeloRatings said:
It's our equal highest points from defensive half after we also had 51 points against West Coast last week. It's our fifth highest points from turnover:
12.10.82 v Syd, R11
11.5.71 v WC, R21
10.4.64 v NM, R18
9.8.62 v Bris, R10
9.5.59 v WB, R22

The problem for us, as always is we gave up 67 points on turnover.

That's the game right there

(Funnily enough they scored 49 point from their defensive half, 2 points less than us. Taken together- ie scores from turnover and scores from defensive half - you get 6 points, which was the margin).

Quote

Tuesday at 11:233 days

Geez the Dogs are good at clearance. I know we were terrible, but 85% of their first possessions resulting in a clearance is crazy good.

Edited Tuesday at 11:253 days by At the break of Gawn

Quote

Tuesday at 13:402 days

Team & Player Ratings to Rnd 22, 2025 vs H&A Season 2024

Season	Team Rating	% Change vs 2025
2021	67.23	-3.34
2022	69.48	-0.10
2023	69.86	0.45

Player	2025 Rating	2025 Rank	2024 Rating	% Change vs 2024	2024 Rank	Change in Rank vs 2024
Max Gawn	4.523	1	4.132	9.5	2	1
C Oliver	4.134	2	3.364	22.9	6	4
C Petracca	3.850	3	4.476	-14.0	1	-2
C Salem	3.746	4	3.421	9.5	4	0
J Bowey	3.721	5	2.755	35.1	13	8
S May	3.588	6	3.741	-4.1	3	-3
J Culley	3.500	7	-	-	-	-
K Pickett	3.476	8	2.433	42.9	16	8
T Rivers <	3.369	9	3.391	-0.6	5	-4
Ed Langdon	3.236	10	3.089	4.8	9	-1
Jack Viney	3.156	11	3.178	-0.7	7	-4
T McDonald	3.077	12	2.967	3.7	11	-1
K Chandler	2.961	13	2.223	33.2	22	9
H Langford >	2.837	14	-	-	-	-
D Turner <	2.784	15	1.393	99.9	32	17
J McVee	2.675	16	2.816	-5.0	12	-4
J Lever	2.672	17	3.103	-13.9	8	-9
B Howes <	2.613	18	2.341	11.6	20	2
X Lindsay < >	2.591	19	-	-	-	-
B Fritsch >	2.525	20	1.746	44.6	29	9
C Windsor > <	2.280	21	2.275	0.2	21	0
T Sparrow	2.236	22	2.517	-11.2	15	-7
J Melksham >	2.130	23	1.850	15.1	27	4
J Billings*	2.100	24	2.430	-13.6	17	-7
C Spargo (vs 2023 Rating) >	1.978	25	1.886	4.9	29	4
H Petty	1.906	26	1.701	12.1	30	4
J Adams*	1.900	27	-	-	-	-
J V Rooyen	1.889	28	2.026	-6.8	24	-4
H Sharp > <	1.848	29	-	-	-	-
J Henderson <	1.726	30	-	-	-	-
K Tholstrup < >	1.681	31	1.898	-11.4	26	-5
T Woewodin* >	1.600	32	2.052	-22.0	23	-9
A Johnson	1.416	33	-	-	-	-
M Jefferson <	1.056	34	-	-	-	-
T Fullarton	0.925	35	-		-	-
B Laurie* >	-0.200	36	2.425	-108.2	18	-18
Team Rating	69.55		65.17	6.7
Top 6	23.56		22.53	4.6
Bottom 6	14.92		14.04	6.2

* Played less than two full matches

< Subbed out at least once or more

> Subbed in at least once or more

Stats courtesy of footwire.com & wheeloratings.com

Edited Tuesday at 13:452 days by Demon Dynasty

Quote

Wednesday at 08:002 days

17 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:
Team & Player Ratings to Rnd 22, 2025 vs H&A Season 2024
Season
Team Rating
% Change vs 2025
2021
67.23
-3.34
2022
69.48
-0.10
2023
69.86
0.45
Player
2025 Rating
2025 Rank
2024 Rating
% Change vs 2024
2024 Rank
Change in Rank vs 2024
Max Gawn
4.523
1
4.132
9.5
2
1
C Oliver
4.134
2
3.364
22.9
6
4
C Petracca
3.850
3
4.476
-14.0
1
-2
C Salem
3.746
4
3.421
9.5
4
0
J Bowey
3.721
5
2.755
35.1
13
8
S May
3.588
6
3.741
-4.1
3
-3
J Culley
3.500
7
-
-
-
-
K Pickett
3.476
8
2.433
42.9
16
8
T Rivers <
3.369
9
3.391
-0.6
5
-4
Ed Langdon
3.236
10
3.089
4.8
9
-1
Jack Viney
3.156
11
3.178
-0.7
7
-4
T McDonald
3.077
12
2.967
3.7
11
-1
K Chandler
2.961
13
2.223
33.2
22
9
H Langford >
2.837
14
-
-
-
-
D Turner <
2.784
15
1.393
99.9
32
17
J McVee
2.675
16
2.816
-5.0
12
-4
J Lever
2.672
17
3.103
-13.9
8
-9
B Howes <
2.613
18
2.341
11.6
20
2
X Lindsay < >
2.591
19
-
-
-
-
B Fritsch >
2.525
20
1.746
44.6
29
9
C Windsor > <
2.280
21
2.275
0.2
21
0
T Sparrow
2.236
22
2.517
-11.2
15
-7
J Melksham >
2.130
23
1.850
15.1
27
4
J Billings*
2.100
24
2.430
-13.6
17
-7
C Spargo (vs 2023 Rating) >
1.978
25
1.886
4.9
29
4
H Petty
1.906
26
1.701
12.1
30
4
J Adams*
1.900
27
-
-
-
-
J V Rooyen
1.889
28
2.026
-6.8
24
-4
H Sharp > <
1.848
29
-
-
-
-
J Henderson <
1.726
30
-
-
-
-
K Tholstrup < >
1.681
31
1.898
-11.4
26
-5
T Woewodin* >
1.600
32
2.052
-22.0
23
-9
A Johnson
1.416
33
-
-
-
-
M Jefferson <
1.056
34
-
-
-
-
T Fullarton
0.925
35
-
-
-
B Laurie* >
-0.200
36
2.425
-108.2
18
-18
Team Rating
69.55

65.17
6.7

Top 6
23.56

22.53
4.6

Bottom 6
14.92

14.04
6.2

* Played less than two full matches
< Subbed out at least once or more
> Subbed in at least once or more
Stats courtesy of footwire.com & wheeloratings.com

Thanks DD some really good signs starting to emerge up from 2024 numbers, Max is still improving, Claz and Salo having better years, Tracc still below his best but better than I expected. Bowey Pickett, Chandler, Rivers, Disco, Langford, Lindsay all on the rise and what about Culley’s first two games.!!!

Quote

Wednesday at 09:122 days

1 hour ago, DeeZone said:
Thanks DD some really good signs starting to emerge up from 2024 numbers, Max is still improving, Claz and Salo having better years, Tracc still below his best but better than I expected. Bowey Pickett, Chandler, Rivers, Disco, Langford, Lindsay all on the rise and what about Culley’s first two games.!!!

It's too early to go the crow DZ but yeh those first two matches from JC are a beauty.

We might have found one here but keeping a lid on it ... for now 😁

Quote

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.

Reply to this topic...

https://demonland.com/forums/topic/61048-stats-file-2025-edition/

Followers

Go to topic listing

AFLW PREVIEW: Western Bulldogs
AFLW PREVIEW: Western Bulldogs

The Dogs reigned supreme in 2018 with an inaugural AFLW premiership cup and the Demons matched this feat by winning the cup as the Season 7 2022 champions.Meggs wasn’t born when the Doggies won their first VFL premiership cup against the Demons in 1954. Covid prevented many Demons fans from legally witnessing the victorious 2021 AFL Grand Final cup performance between the Demons and the Bulldogs, but we all grin when remembering those magnificent seven third quarter goals.
- 1 reply
Demonland

13 hours ago13 hr
PREVIEW: Hawthorn
PREVIEW: Hawthorn

Hawthorn and Melbourne. Two teams with impressive form from last week but with seasons that are travelling on different trajectories meet in Saturday’s twilight game for what could well be the most intriguing contest of the AFL’s penultimate round. Sadly, the game has been relegated to that unappealing time slot in the weekend when Melburnians are typically preoccupied with activities other than football. It falls between the morning's shopping, afternoon sport and recreation, and Saturday night fever. A time usually reserved for relatively insignificant events but this one is not a nothingburger for either of the clubs or their fans.
- 0 replies
Demonland

Yesterday at 00:281 day
AFLW: 2025 Season Preview
AFLW: 2025 Season Preview

Ten seasons. Eighteen teams. With the young talent pathway finally fully connected, Women’s Australian Rules football is building momentum and Season 2025 promises to be the best yet. In advance of Season 10, the AFL leadership has engaged in candid discussions with all clubs regarding strategies to boost attendance and expand fan bases. Concerningly, average attendances in 2024 were 2,660 fans per match, with the women’s game incurring an annual loss of approximately $50 million.
- 0 replies
Demonland

Tuesday at 00:013 days
REPORT: Western Bulldogs
REPORT: Western Bulldogs

The next coach of the Melbourne Football Club faces the challenge of teaching his players how to win games against all comers. At times during this tumultuous season, that task has seemed daunting, made more so in light of the surprise news last week of the sacking of premiership coach Simon Goodwin. However, there were also some positive signs from yesterday’s match against the Western Bulldogs that the challenge may not be as difficult as one might think. The two sides presented a genuine football spectacle, featuring pulsating competitive play with eight lead changes throughout the afternoon, in a display befitting a finals match.The result could have gone either way and in the end, it came down to which team could produce the most desperate of acts to provide a winning result. It was the Bulldogs who had their season on the line that won out by a six point margin that fitted the game and the effort of both sides.
- 0 replies
Demonland

Monday at 00:344 days
CASEY: Brisbane
CASEY: Brisbane

The rain had been falling heavily in south east Queensland when the match began at Springfield, west of Brisbane. The teams exchanged early goals and then the Casey Demons proceeded like a house on fire in the penultimate game of the VFL season against a strong opponent in the Brisbane Lions. Sparked by strong play around the ground by seasoned players in Charlie Spargo and Jack Billings, a strong effort from Bailey Laurie and promising work from youngsters in Kynan Brown and Koltyn Tholstrup, the Demons with multiple goal kickers firing, raced to a 27 point lead late in the opening stanza. A highlight was a wonderful goal from Laurie who brilliantly sidestepped two opponents and kicked beautifully from 45 metres out.
- 0 replies
Demonland

Monday at 00:294 days
PREGAME: Hawthorn
PREGAME: Hawthorn

The Demons return to the MCG this time as the visiting team where they get another opportunity to put a dent into a team's top 8 placing when they take on the Hawks on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?
- 159 replies
Demonland

Sunday at 09:095 days