Jump to content

Didak gawn....

brey9186
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

The AFL wishes to advise the Match Review Panel has assessed the following incidents from the weekend's round of matches.

Charges Laid:

Ryan Crowley, Fremantle, has been charged with bumping or making forceful contact from front-on against Simon Prestigiacomo, Collingwood, during the second quarter of the Round Ten match between Fremantle and Collingwood, played at the MCG on Friday June 1, 2007.

In summary, his existing carry-over points from a previous offence means that his penalty must remain as a one-game sanction. Please note that this particular charge is classified as body contact, as the rule covers for contact to be made to the head/neck or the body from front-on.

The incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has 93.75 points carried over from within the last 12 months, increasing the penalty to 218.75 points and a two-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 164.06 points and a one-match sanction.

Brodie Holland, Collingwood, has been charged with a second offence for making negligent contact with umpire Matthew James during the third quarter of the Round Ten match between Collingwood and Fremantle, played at the MCG on Friday June 1, 2007.

In summary, he can accept a $3300 sanction with an early plea.

A second offence for making negligent contact with an umpire is a $4400 sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to a $3300 sanction.

Alan Didak, Collingwood, has been charged with charging Paul Hasleby, Fremantle, during the fourth quarter of the Round Ten match between Collingwood and Fremantle, played at the MCG on Friday June 1, 2007.

In summary, his previous record means his penalty must remain as a one-game sanction.

The incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This a total of three activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level One offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has a total of two matches suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 20 per cent to 150 demerit points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 112.50 demerit points and a one-match sanction.

handy, he is their game breaker

  • Quote
    •  

    Having not even seen the incident i'm confident he'll play.

    1) he plays for collingwood

    2) they're playing melbourne this week, and everyone who goes up to the tribunal before playing melbourne seems to get off

    3) the panel are the most inconsistent bunch of morons running around (after the rule makers that is)

  • Quote
    •  
    Having not even seen the incident i'm confident he'll play.

    1) he plays for collingwood

    2) they're playing melbourne this week, and everyone who goes up to the tribunal before playing melbourne seems to get off

    3) the panel are the most inconsistent bunch of morons running around (after the rule makers that is)

    Well if Collingwood contest and he gets off, I'll look forward to Belly tearing him a new one.

    Bring it on you filthy Magpies! :D

  • Quote

    They will get off they play for collingwood easy up, there not melbourne players.

  • Quote
    Having not even seen the incident i'm confident he'll play.

    1) he plays for collingwood

    2) they're playing melbourne this week, and everyone who goes up to the tribunal before playing melbourne seems to get off

    3) the panel are the most inconsistent bunch of morons running around (after the rule makers that is)

    I can't see any cause which would merit presenting a case to the Tribunal. The offence has been graded at the absolute bottom of the scale of offences and may thus not be argued down. Are they going to suggest it did not happen? The only course would be to go for accidental or inadvertent which would be frivilous. I say make an example of him if he fronts and give him a couple.

  • Quote

    probably, and they will get him off

    i can see it now "but your honor he didnt touch him, the freo player looked at the collingwood jumper and fell over with desire to wear it"

    or something equally ridiculous

  • Quote
    •  

    honestly couldn't care if he plays, hell i hope he does. another feral who can be on the ground with tears in his eyes as his ears fill to the glorious sounds of 'IT'S A GRAND OLD FLAG...' go on didak, fight it, get off, then get punished on monday

  • Quote

    didak has been suspended for one match BUTT!

    "Didak has been charged with charging Paul Hasleby. If he accepts an early plea, out suspended for one week. BUT!!! he risks no increase in the penalty if he takes the charge to the tribunal"

    Daniel belll got killed by didak last year..... i was actually looking forward to the rematch.... see how bellly has gone since then...

    but i think it would be in our best interest if he is out tho...

    but he will contest

    and he will get off.... as the trends would suggest

  • Quote

    Yeah...

    Pretty much covered it there BB.

    I'm sure it'll help us to free him up for another opponent, maybe have him play a more attacking role. Perhaps run with Buckley if he plays. There are pros and cons to both scenarios though.

    I tell you what, this may well be the game of the year for the demons.

  • Quote
    Well if Collingwood contest and he gets off, I'll look forward to Belly tearing him a new one.

    Bring it on you filthy Magpies! :D

    That is so freaky, I was just about to post just that! :o

  • Quote

    Collingwood will definitely contest, according to Footy Classifieds.

    Ironically, they are going to show the Goodes hit on Godders that only got him a reprimand, which we all know was a soft verdict.

    Regardless, he's sure to get off and be there on Monday.

  • Quote

    Showing the Goodes hit is stupid because if Goodes didn't have a good record over the last 5 years he would have been given a week as well. Didak has a bad record and therefore he gets points added pushing it from a reprimand to 1 week.

    I haven't seen the incident but I think he will get off because that is the way the tribunal is going this year.

  • Quote

    Showing the Goodes hit is stupid because if Goodes didn't have a good record over the last 5 years he would have been given a week as well. Didak has a bad record and therefore he gets points added pushing it from a reprimand to 1 week.

    I haven't seen the incident but I think he will get off because that is the way the tribunal is going this year.

    exactly, goodes would have copped a wek with the same past record as didak so they would be just shooting themelves in the foot, on the otherhand they really should walk in and show the vision and say "c'mon boys look at this, this is [censored] weak, so soft that its ridiculous"

    i think its funny he got cited, there is nothing in that, goodes atleast had major force behind him, didak was just [censored] stirring with his, this game is getting very soft

  • Quote

    What is with this current trend of players knowingly charging a bloke who is not looking? Goodes did it, Didak did it, in years gone by this would have been frowned upon along with kicking, now everyone is getting in on it.

    At least give the other guy a chance to defend himself. Very cowardly in my eyes.

  • Quote
    Collingwood will definitely contest, according to Footy Classifieds.

    Ironically, they are going to show the Goodes hit on Godders that only got him a reprimand, which we all know was a soft verdict.

    Regardless, he's sure to get off and be there on Monday.

    I agree he will definately play, It was extremely soft, if he doesnt play the tribunal is a joke.

    Im sure that this site would go into meltdown if a Melb player got reported for that.

    Anyway I want him there so Belly can tear him apart.

  • Quote

    Collingwood will appeal , not surprising thou, I worry about the likes of Swan , Heath Shaw Lockyer and Leon Davis(rocca had his good kicking game last week)

  • Quote

    Collingwood will appeal , not surprising thou, I worry about the likes of Swan , Heath Shaw Lockyer and Leon Davis(rocca had his good kicking game last week)

    Don't think Heath Shaw is playing.

    Didak will get off. All they have to do is show the Goodes footage and he'll get off.

  • Quote
    And Buckley is listed as 2-3 weeks away still...

    Never expected him to play. As much as I like Bucks, I seriously think it's time for the guy just to give up. They've done fine without him. Get in the coaches box and help from there.

  • Quote
    •  
    Ironically, they are going to show the Goodes hit on Godders that only got him a reprimand, which we all know was a soft verdict.

    Regardless, he's sure to get off and be there on Monday.

    Goodes was still found guilty and only got a reprimand because of his good record. Didak's bad record is what has got him a week. His hit has been classified the same as Goodes' was.

  • Quote
    Goodes was still found guilty and only got a reprimand because of his good record. Didak's bad record is what has got him a week. His hit has been classified the same as Goodes' was.

    Yeah I was actually just thinking of that. He might stay at one week.

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 15

      As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

        • Like
      • 36 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Port Adelaide

      Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 2 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Essendon

      Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

        • Clap
      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Gold Coast

      The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

        • Thanks
      • 110 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 32 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

      The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

        • Haha
        • Thanks
      • 252 replies
      Demonland
    View All