Jump to content

Who is standing up and who isn't

Featured Replies

Posted

Just wondering on fellow demonlanders thoughts on who has actually given us something in this hellish start to a season and who should be refunding their pay cheques.

The following can hold their heads high IMO

Bruce - has been one of our better players throughout, not getting the support needed

Miller - OK not the most gifted player but he's doing probably more than what any expected of him

JMac - same as Bruce, reliable no matter what

I think Brad Green has given something, Rivers plays well no matter what, Moloney, Jones and Godfrey give it everything and I'm struggling to think of anyone else. Yze has bounced back somewhat.

The following have shown nothing

Johnstone - most disappointing player of this season. What's his contract status? Lets get someone with some actual ticker. His talent is on the wane

Jamar - SHOCKING! I've thought this for a long time. His been a passanger on the back of White for a while and now is the time to stand up and he's done nothing. Useless

Carroll - Having a rubbish season. I give him some leeway because the ball is getting pumped into our defensive 50 ad nauseum

Sylvia - harsh, but for Christs sakes do something boy!

Chris Johnson - he needs to show something very soon

And pretty much everyone else has been mediocre.

 
Just wondering on fellow demonlanders thoughts on who has actually given us something in this hellish start to a season and who should be refunding their pay cheques.

The following can hold their heads high IMO

Bruce - has been one of our better players throughout, not getting the support needed

Although he has been getting plenty of the ball, I don't think he has had enough influence in the team like he should. This includes being at the bottom of the packs more, taking more contested marks and kicking 2 or 3 goals per game. We need him to do that. ATM, he is probably our best player and 30 possies a game just is not enough.

Miller - OK not the most gifted player but he's doing probably more than what any expected of him

Agreed. He will never be a goal kicker but he leads very well. However, he needs to hold onto more marks. It just seems like they are too easily punched away. And he also drops some absolute sitters. He has been a good leader imo and presents very well. With a better structure, he can be a 10+ marks per game player, but he needs to adjust and everyone around him needs to give him space; he isnt the best in packs.

JMac - same as Bruce, reliable no matter what

Had an average past two weeks, but I'm confident that his presence on the field is enough. He was never a prolific ball winner before he was considered a leader anyway. Furthermore, it's always good to have an in and under player like him. A true demon. Will always give 100%.

I think Brad Green has given something (One good week against Geelong and a good week against Freo is not enough for me; we were depelted and he did ok considering the circumstances, but, like Bruce, should have been better. Saints and Hawks games he seemed disinterested. He is 50/50 for me on the season; been too inconsistent, which is the story of his career.), Rivers plays well no matter what (agreed), Moloney, Jones and Godfrey give it everything and I'm struggling to think of anyone else (double agreed. probably our better three, though Jones seems to have lost a little touch from last year. Maybe the injury is good and he will get some rest and game time through Sandy. Still young). Yze has bounced back somewhat (What games have you been watching? One great game against Freo and 3 really bad ones. How is that bouncing back?).

The following have shown nothing

Johnstone - most disappointing player of this season. What's his contract status? Lets get someone with some actual ticker. His talent is on the wane (has never been interested and never will be. Our most tradeable asset. I'm sick of this guy. Biggest waste of talent ever. Gambles his money and our patience.)

Jamar - SHOCKING! I've thought this for a long time. His been a passanger on the back of White for a while and now is the time to stand up and he's done nothing. Useless (Besides him being a pretty good tap ruckman, his football smarts are just, well, non-existent. Can't get the ball and his kicking technique is terrible. Has improved in front of goal and can only get better. A little harsh, but atm is our only true backup ruckman. Be prepared for him to be our number 1 ruckman in 2 or 3 years, unless we draft a superstar who is ready to ruck in the AFL from day one)

Carroll - Having a rubbish season. I give him some leeway because the ball is getting pumped into our defensive 50 ad nauseum Not a rubbish season, but a tough one. Pretty much been thrown to the wolves straight away because the ball gets pumped in so often this season (i think we average like 21 goals a game). Help hasnt been that great but has done ok. Seems to have forgotten how to punch a ball, though.)

Sylvia - harsh, but for Christs sakes do something boy! Yeah, harsh. Yet to live up to expectations though. Injury has hurt him. Does his absolute heart out though. Maybe if he focused a little more on his disposal than on his hair he'd do better...)

Chris Johnson - he needs to show something very soon (i'm over this guy. does nothing for me.)

And pretty much everyone else has been mediocre. (agreed...)

Johnstone is a joke of a player, most people dont rate or respect him for all the reasons already mentioned and rightly so. He is lazy and not committed. His season so far has been beyond disappointing.

Dont get me started on sylvia. I cant stand players who get by on their reputations. He should not be in the side at the moment, even with these injuries. He isnt contributing at all and just doesnt know how to read the play or get amongst the packs to use his body strength. It is clear he was a waste at pick 3. We could have had Ryan Griffen. How good would it have been to get Brocky and griffen from that draft.

Chris Johnson is, like many of our players, a good sandringham player. He doesnt have what it takes for AFL.

Jamar = DUD

P Johnson = DUD

White = time to retire

 
It is clear he was a waste at pick 3. We could have had Ryan Griffen. How good would it have been to get Brocky and griffen from that draft.

:wacko: Ryan Griffen was taken in the 2004 draft, Sylvia was taken in the 2003 draft.

:wacko: Ryan Griffen was taken in the 2004 draft, Sylvia was taken in the 2003 draft.

Stop interrupting with facts. Gees! :rolleyes:


:wacko: Ryan Griffen was taken in the 2004 draft, Sylvia was taken in the 2003 draft.

fair enough my mistake. well im sure there were some very handy players taken after him. That was my point.

fair enough my mistake. well im sure there were some very handy players taken after him. That was my point.

Let's see..... Hmmm..... 2003 Draft......

Players taken after Sylvia.....

Farren Ray (WB)

Keppler Bradley (Ess)

Kane Tenace (Geel)

Raph Clarke (StK)

Beau Waters (WC)

Brent Stanton (Ess)

Amon Buchanan (Syd)

Michael Pettigrew (Port)

Sam Fisher (StK)

Ben Hudson (Adel)

Michael Rischitelli (Bris)

Shane Tuck (Rich)

Andrew Raines (Rich)

All of these have gone on to be good, but not exeptional footballers.....

Sylvia had that X factor.... Just the OP has ruined him early....

Don't lose hope! - He hasn't!!

Farren Ray (WB)

Keppler Bradley (Ess)

Kane Tenace (Geel)

Raph Clarke (StK)

Beau Waters (WC)

Brent Stanton (Ess)

Amon Buchanan (Syd)

Michael Pettigrew (Port)

Sam Fisher (StK)

Ben Hudson (Adel)

Michael Rischitelli (Bris)

Shane Tuck (Rich)

Andrew Raines (Rich)

In hindsight Waters, Hudson or Rischitelli would have been the way to go.

 
In hindsight Waters, Hudson or Rischitelli would have been the way to go.

In hindsight I'm glad we picked Brock and not Tenace - as many supporters wanted.

In hindsight I'm glad we picked Brock and not Tenace - as many supporters wanted.

In hindsight, I'm glad Brock's parents met and produced such gift for us!! :P


In hindsight, I'm glad Brock's parents met and produced such gift for us!! :P

PURE GOLD!

sylvia will come good if the injuries go away

funny how people always defend godfrey for his willingness to run and chase and try hard, sylvia does the same but gets bagged for it

sylvia will come good if the injuries go away

Agree 100%

Guaranteed if we were to trade the boy, then whoever picked him up would have a star in their side! A player with so much skill and aggression doesn't just turn into a hack.... Injuries have robbed him of his junior days, but that is not to say he won't be a great player over the next 4-5 years!!

funny how people always defend godfrey for his willingness to run and chase and try hard, sylvia does the same but gets bagged for it

Funny how people always defend Sylvia for his exceptional skill and his "X-factor" but Godfrey attempts the same and gets bagged for it :D

Chris Johnson is, like many of our players, a good sandringham player. He doesnt have what it takes for AFL.

I've been really disappointed in this kid.

Had a stellar NAB Cup V Hawthorn where he was everywhere and kicked a classy super goal, and then followed this up with a 9/10 performance against Richmond at Princes Park. I was convinced then and there that CJ's time had arrived.

How wrong I was. CJ has been averaging about 10 touches a game, doesn't do any damage and gets caught too often (ie - V Sydney in our defensive when Micky O chased him down which resulted in a Swans goal)

Like so many of our players at the moment, he's too good for Sandy but not good enough at AFL level.

I've been really disappointed in this kid.

Had a stellar NAB Cup V Hawthorn where he was everywhere and kicked a classy super goal, and then followed this up with a 9/10 performance against Richmond at Princes Park. I was convinced then and there that CJ's time had arrived.

How wrong I was. CJ has been averaging about 10 touches a game, doesn't do any damage and gets caught too often (ie - V Sydney in our defensive when Micky O chased him down which resulted in a Swans goal)

Like so many of our players at the moment, he's too good for Sandy but not good enough at AFL level.

I have spoken to CJ on numerous occasions, and I am left in no doubt that it is a confidence thing. He has very little of it, because Daniher has none in him. New coach will bring out the best in him.

Amazing. Daniher is giving him significant game time. Hardly a vote of no confidence.

BTW, would CJ be prepared to back your assessment of Daniher?

Its no wonder some players are sheepish about talking to the public.


I don't think he is getting significant game time at all. Quite the opposite. And CJ didnt say he explicitly said that to me - but I reckon it's definitely the case, and I'm not breaking a confidence, because I think it's obvious to most.

And CJ didnt say he explicitly said that to me - but I reckon it's definitely the case, and I'm not breaking a confidence, because I think it's obvious to most.

"Seems like". "Looks like". "Appears to be". "I reckon". "I think it's obvious".

Too much opinion parading as fact on this board at the moment.

"Seems like". "Looks like". "Appears to be". "I reckon". "I think it's obvious".

Too much opinion parading as fact on this board at the moment.

Absolutely Maurie. Absolutely

Choko's original e-mail suggested from his "converations" with CJ that CJ had no confidence because ND had no confidence in him when all the time its the poster's opinion of the matters.

Both CJ and ND have been misrepresented here and the disclosure of such "conversations" had no bearing or relevance on the poster ultimately giving his opinion.

I think it can be tough on players when their position in the team is constantly under question and they're not sure about their abilities at AFL level. I know many players have said that they didn't play as well as they could until they'd become more confident of their spot in the team, and perhaps CJ does indeed need more confidence.

Personally I'd be trying to get as many games as I could into him this year.

PURE GOLD!

sylvia will come good if the injuries go away

funny how people always defend godfrey for his willingness to run and chase and try hard, sylvia does the same but gets bagged for it

'condemned 84', neither of these players ought to be bagged, they both put their bodies on the line where others won't & both have a crack even when things aren't going well. They're not the ones who drop their heads & their bundles...


I think it can be tough on players when their position in the team is constantly under question and they're not sure about their abilities at AFL level. I know many players have said that they didn't play as well as they could until they'd become more confident of their spot in the team, and perhaps CJ does indeed need more confidence.

Personally I'd be trying to get as many games as I could into him this year.

I would agree Rogue. FWIW, I think it is very difficult for younger players like Bell, Bate and CJ to often make their way and get establish when the side is under siege as the current line up is. We are probably expecting as much from CJ as we are from other more established players and I dont think that is reasonable. Its a hard learning experience but I would hope an invaluable one that is useful as he gains more experience.

'condemned 84', neither of these players ought to be bagged, they both put their bodies on the line where others won't & both have a crack even when things aren't going well. They're not the ones who drop their heads & their bundles...

Too true.

FCS. Sylvia is still not free from OP yet. Godfrey is there to do a particular job. If he does it then fine. If we were seriously battling for Top 4 in September I am not sure I would want to have him in the line up. But given the lack of head down players we have given injuries, he has my full support.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 395 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies