Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 7/27/2022 at 1:40 PM, old55 said:

I could care less about spelling and grammar.

 

3 hours ago, Demonstone said:

I cringe at "I could care less", which indicates that the speaker has at least some level of care.

Surely "I couldn't care less" (I have no care) is what they mean.

 

 
22 minutes ago, Spirit of '87 said:

It should more traditionally be “I”, as you are effectively saying “my brother is taller than I am…” 

i.e. “he is taller than I am”

hence “he is taller than I…”

but “me” seems to be the more commonly used these days. 

https://onlinewritingtraining.com.au/than-i-versus-than-me/

The link asks more questions than it answers. For example, who knew that "than" could be either a conjunction or a preposition?

A lot of learnings in this thread. 

 
33 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

It doesn't mean a prisoner going back to jail, which is what I'm sure they'd be thinking.

Either that or they'd think it was a Greek bloke coming down the stairs.

Let me vent my spleen a little more.

1.  "You're bias".   You can have bias, in which case you are biased.  It's a noun, not a verb.

2.  "That's cringe".  It may make you cringe, in which case it's cringeworthy.

3.  "Get off of".  An Americanism that just grates.

4.  "Allot" means to distribute, to allocate.  If there is plenty of something, there's a lot of it.


3 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Let me vent my spleen a little more.

1.  "You're bias".   You can have bias, in which case you are biased.  It's a noun, not a verb.

2.  "That's cringe".  It may make you cringe, in which case it's cringeworthy.

3.  "Get off of".  An Americanism that just grates.

4.  "Allot" means to distribute, to allocate.  If there is plenty of something, there's a lot of it.


Awful, but could it be considered a malapropism rather than poor grammar? 

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Let me vent my spleen a little more.

3.  "Get off of".  An Americanism that just grates.

 

You hypocrite! You and Mike coined that expression in the early ‘60’s. Remember this?:

”hey hey you you get off of my cloud…”

 

 

Take a close look at the Collingwood banner on Friday night. There should be atleast one spelling error.  Essendon would be another banner to look out for.

Why dont the dees cheer squad do their banner in latin?

That would P.. Off Collingwood supporters no end.


13 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

I wouldn't class that as a malapropism.

Isn’t a malapropism a knowingly-incorrect usage of a word or term (as opposed to an ignorant one)? Or are you saying that there’s nothing “knowing” about it?

Malapropism is the use of an incorrect word in an amusingly inappropriate way and may be deliberate or accidental, but is more commonly the latter.  

 

 

8 minutes ago, deebunked said:

Take a close look at the Collingwood banner on Friday night. There should be atleast one spelling error.  Essendon would be another banner to look out for.

Why dont the dees cheer squad do their banner in latin?

That would P.. Off Collingwood supporters no end.

*sigh* …would thou couldst, deebunked, would thou bloody couldst.
Sorry, that’s Old English, not Latin. 

I can’t speak for other teams’ banners but in our case you’ll likely never see a mistake. This is partly because we have an elevated platform, the view from which makes it easier to spot anything untoward. It’s also because we’re Melbourne supporters and therefore our I.Q. is not in single digits. Nor is our tooth count, for that matter. 
😁


26 minutes ago, deebunked said:

 

Why dont the dees cheer squad do their banner in latin?

 

All for it. 

6 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Malapropism is the use of an incorrect word in an amusingly inappropriate way and may be deliberate or accidental, but is more commonly the latter.  

 

 

Not to be confused with mondegreens.

2 minutes ago, Winners at last said:

Not to be confused with mondegreens.

Alex the seal?

13 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Malapropism is the use of an incorrect word in an amusingly inappropriate way and may be deliberate or accidental, but is more commonly the latter.  

 

 

I see.

So what is the term for a word such as “woke”? Where a word is commonly-understood to be “incorrect”, but forges on regardless to become part of the lexicon?

Is that just another malapropism? Seems like such a thing deserves it’s own term. 


17 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Alex the seal?

The definitive mondegreen. Well played.

 

There's a bathroom on the right ...

1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

2.  "That's cringe".  It may make you cringe, in which case it's cringeworthy.

Channelling my pedantic grumpy old man persona, I'd also like to ask when exactly 'fail' began to be used as either a noun or adjective.

For example:

The heavy defeat that Melbourne dished out to Gold Coast displayed the flaws inherent in their rebuilding process. The whole thing totally reeks of fail.

I always thought the proper lexical item in this case was 'failure'.

 

 
1 hour ago, Mel Bourne said:

So what is the term for a word such as “woke”?

To say it's a cliched, catch-all pejorative would be to risk straying into the muddy waters of politics.   

 

40 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

To say it's a cliched, catch-all pejorative would be to risk straying into the muddy waters of politics.   

 

Ha! Fair point. Bad example! 

Edited by Mel Bourne


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 222 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 29 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 253 replies