Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

OK, listen up you freaks and listen good. 

The past couple of brainteasers have obviously been too easy which has led to the totally unacceptable outcome of people solving them in short time.

This clearly cannot continue to go on in the same manner, so I have attempted to make this week's teaser more challenging.

Here is a team consisting of current AFL players, all of whom should be familiar to you.

What is the connection?

B:   Nick Coffield    Dylan Grimes    Isaac Quaynor

H/B:   Kyle Langford    Dan Houston    Zac Williams

C:   Lachie Hunter    Andrew Brayshaw    Rory Sloane

H/F:   Michael Walters    Mitch McGovern    Nakia Cockatoo

F:   Taylor Walker    Darcy Cameron    Dayne Zorko

R:   Rory Thompson    Jarrod Lyons    Sam Walsh

I/C:   Eddie Betts    Chad Wingard    Dyson Heppell    Mitch Duncan

 

Easy. Numbers 1 to 22.

Edited by Clintosaurus

  • Author

So much for being more challenging, then!

Well spotted Clintosaurus; I thought this one might take some time to solve.

Seeing as it's gone off so quickly, here's another one I prepared earlier.

As usual, I'm looking for what the players in this team have in common.

B:  Hayden Young   Ben Hart   Daniel Rich

H/B:  Matthew Collins   Trevor Barker   Darcy Tucker

C:  Scott Thompson   Nathan Jones   Oskar Baker

H/F:  Dale Thomas   Jack Watts   Stephen Powell

F:   Charlie Cameron   Michael Roach   Shaun Smith

R:  Mark Lee   Nathan Burke   Sam Mitchell

I/C:  Daniel Ward   Nick Blakey   Lewis Taylor   Brodie Holland

 

Is there a prominent Welsh poet on the Half Forward line @demonstone?

 

*edit also a british/welsh politician on the half forward line.

 

** ok two lines of enquiry.

Nationality and Literature.

Edited by Engorged Onion


2 hours ago, demonstone said:

OK, listen up you freaks and listen good. 

The best opening line to a DL thread ever! 

  • Author
26 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

Nationality and Literature.

Sorry Swollen Shallot, neither of these are close to the answer.

As a minuscule clue, there is one particular Demonlander (who I can't recall participating in these teasers) who would instantly identify the common factor.

 

the only other topic I have would be Indigenous Australians?

18 minutes ago, demonstone said:

Sorry Swollen Shallot, neither of these are close to the answer.

As a minuscule clue, there is one particular Demonlander (who I can't recall participating in these teasers) who would instantly identify the common factor.

I’m so sh*t at these. How about a majuscule clue?

Please. Pretty please!

Edited by WalkingCivilWar
I’m not above begging


I'm skeptical. I don't reckon there's any connection unless it's to do with the spelling of names or something. 

5 minutes ago, demonstone said:

Not an Indigenous connection.

Majuscule clue:  Nothing to do with football or guernsey numbers.

I'm intrigued that you nonetheless have them all playing in their notionally correct positions!

Thinking, thinking, thinking...

  • Author
11 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

I don't reckon there's any connection

There's a connection alright.  Only one of us would try to troll Demonland. 

I'll leave this open until somebody inevitably works it out.

Funny how it goes.  I thought the initial quiz was difficult (lasted three nanoseconds) and this one much easier.

Backward names?


52 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

I'm skeptical. I don't reckon there's any connection unless it's to do with the spelling of names or something. 

Are you really skeptical? Or do you just phrase things from a negative perspective as a rule of thumb? 
 

can you seriously imagine someone, having run 4/5 other brain teasers suddenly presenting one and saying there is a connection when there isn’t, just to have a laff? 

 

1 hour ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

I'm intrigued that you nonetheless have them all playing in their notionally correct positions!

A red herring, perhaps?

9 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

Are you really skeptical? Or do you just phrase things from a negative perspective as a rule of thumb? 
 

can you seriously imagine someone, having run 4/5 other brain teasers suddenly presenting one and saying there is a connection when there isn’t, just to have a laff? 

 

this is the first brain teaser I've seen

  • Author

No scarlet sardines were harmed in the making of this team.

edit:  Replying to WCW!

Edited by demonstone
!


2 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

this is the first brain teaser I've seen

You picked a great one to start with. This one’s a doozy !

14 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

Are you really skeptical? Or do you just phrase things from a negative perspective as a rule of thumb? 
 

can you seriously imagine someone, having run 4/5 other brain teasers suddenly presenting one and saying there is a connection when there isn’t, just to have a laff? 

 

Agreed Onion. You just come across as such a sad miserable [censored] Dr. D. Keep up the good work Demonstone, and go Dees!!

I give up. :) I've ruled out jumper numbers, spelling of names, tattoos, helmet wearers and hair colour. 

 
8 minutes ago, Demondan75 said:

Agreed Onion. You just come across as such a sad miserable [censored] Dr. D. Keep up the good work Demonstone, and go Dees!!

A little aggressive I would've thought. Pretty content actually :) I just perceive most posters as fanciful. It's like if you go and read another clubs forum. Half the stuff you read makes you laugh at how biased it is. I'm very even-keeled and am completely impartial. Maybe being slightly more critical than most, aka the way Gary Lyon sees Melbourne.  

11 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

A little aggressive I would've thought. Pretty content actually :) I just perceive most posters as fanciful. It's like if you go and read another clubs forum. Half the stuff you read makes you laugh at how biased it is. I'm very even-keeled and am completely impartial. Maybe being slightly more critical than most, aka the way Gary Lyon sees Melbourne.  

You are not impartial, and you simply took a chance to pot a fellow poster who is just having a bit of fun and filling in the gaps between games. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 231 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies