Stats Files - 2020

[spirit of norm smith 15,276]

Key stats.

Goals scored versus Goals scored.   Or indeed total score v total against in each respective game. 
 

Dees are eighth on this list.
6 positive. 6 negative. 
 

(Ahead if dons and dogs)

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

Rnd 14, 2020 TIO - Demons vs Saints

Team score, allowing for this season's 20% less game time, was 6% off the 2019 average and 17% lower than 2018's.

Still not sure how we won that.  Possibly just the fact we held our structure better than they did and finally managed to even up (or maybe just limited) their stoppage clearances.  Even Ed's last kick.  If he hangs on to it and eats up his 7 seconds we are a shoe in but he plays on, kicks down the line and it ends up with a Saint and, had we not been able to hem him in they might have had one last foray forward with about 14 seconds left.  All is forgiven though as he had a very good day otherwise.  May, Tracc daylight then Clarry, Ed and Salem the stand outs for mine.  Lovely game from the young rookie Rivers.

May's 9th top five finish this season.

Player	Score	Rank
Clayton Oliver	4.200	1
Steven May	4.150	2
Christian Salem	3.725	3
Christian Petracca	3.350	4
Ed Langdon	2.800	5
Jack Viney	2.700	6
Jake Lever	2.375	7
Joshua Wagner	2.375	8
Michael Hibberd	2.300	9
Adam Tomlinson	2.250	10
Max Gawn #	2.250	11
Angus Brayshaw	2.050	12
Trent Rivers	1.725	13
Charlie Spargo	1.250	14
Aaron Vandenberg	1.050	15
Mitchell Brown	1.050	16
Sam Weideman	1.000	17
Nathan Jones	0.775	18
Oscar McDonald	0.775	18
Jake Melksham	0.700	20
Kysaiah Pickett	0.600	21
Mitchell Hannan	0.475	22
Team Score	43.925
Top 6	20.925
Bottom 6	4.325

# Hit outs to advantage not captured

Stats courtesy of footywire.com

Edited August 29, 2020 by Rusty Nails

[Fanatique Demon 2,624]

Thanks Rusty. 

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

14 minutes ago, Fanatique Demon said:

Thanks Rusty. 

No worries FD

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

The Saints

Player Score Rank Jack Steele  4.350 1 Bradley Hill  4.150 2 Zak Jones  3.250 3 Ben Long  2.875 4 Jack Sinclair  2.850 5 Sebastian Ross  2.675 6 Rowan Marshall # 2.625 7 Ben Paton  2.525 8 Callum Wilkie  2.450 9 Edward Phillips  2.375 10 Dougal Howard  2.225 11 Daniel Butler  2.075 12 Nicholas Coffield  1.975 13 Patrick Ryder # 1.825 14 Jarryn Geary  1.600 15 Hunter Clark  1.225 16 Tim Membrey  1.200 17 Josh Battle  1.200 18 Nick Hind  1.000 19 Jack Billings  0.950 20 Max King  0.700 21 Dean Kent  0.300 22 Team Score 46.400   Top 6 20.150   Bottom 6 5.350

Edited August 29, 2020 by Rusty Nails

[Fanatique Demon 2,624]

1 hour ago, Rusty Nails said:

No worries FD

Many years ago I studied Econometrics at Monash. I only worked for a few years at the ABS (Bureau of Census and Statistics as it was then), but I've always been interested in the field.

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

7 hours ago, Fanatique Demon said:

Many years ago I studied Econometrics at Monash. I only worked for a few years at the ABS (Bureau of Census and Statistics as it was then), but I've always been interested in the field.

Monash was (is?) a great environment from all reports FD.  Happy to send the excel file if you're interested in browsing / tinkering.  Pretty basic stuff.

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

Weighted Averages up to and including Rnd 14, 2020

Player	2020 Weighted Score	2020 Rank	2019 Weighted Score	% Change vs 2019	% Change vs 2019 w/ 20% time adjusted	2019 Rank	Change in Rank vs 2019
Clayton Oliver	4.200	1	4.880	-13.93	7.58	1	0
Christian Petracca	3.785	2	2.843	33.13	66.42	9	7
Max Gawn #	3.100	3	3.437	-9.81	12.74	4	1
Jack Viney	3.002	4	3.258	-7.86	15.18	5	1
Christian Salem	2.925	5	3.658	-20.04	-0.05	3	-2
Steven May	2.831	6	2.618	8.14	35.17	14	8
Ed Langdon	2.783	7	-	-	-	-	-
Angus Brayshaw	2.596	8	3.131	-17.09	3.64	6	-2
Michael Hibberd	2.338	9	2.339	-0.04	24.95	19	10
Jake Lever	2.277	10	2.519	-9.61	12.99	16	6
James Harmes	2.208	11	4.039	-45.33	-31.67	2	-9
Tom Sparrow	2.150	12	1.275	68.63	110.78	37	25
Adam Tomlinson #	1.933	13	-	-	-	-	-
Braydon Preuss #	1.875	14	1.643	14.12	42.65	33	19
Harley Bennell	1.850	15	-	-	-	-	-
Nathan Jones	1.807	16	2.907	-37.84	-22.30	7	-9
Alex N-Bullen	1.783	17	2.120	-15.90	5.13	22	5
Oscar McDonald	1.733	18	1.956	-11.40	10.75	26	8
Tom McDonald #	1.675	19	2.297	-27.08	-8.85	20	1
Jay Lockhart	1.650	20	1.819	-9.29	13.39	30	10
Bayley Fritsch	1.640	21	2.809	-41.62	-27.02	10	-11
Trent Rivers	1.605	22	-	-	-	-	-
Sam Weideman	1.600	23	1.895	-15.57	5.54	27	4
Mitchell Hannan	1.506	24	1.433	5.09	31.37	36	12
Luke Jackson #	1.463	25	-	-	-	-	-
Aaron Vandenburg	1.394	26	-	-	-	-	-
Charlie Spargo	1.360	27	1.513	-10.11	12.36	35	8
Neville Jetta	1.355	28	2.264	-40.15	-25.19	18	-10
Jake Melksham	1.319	29	2.181	-39.52	-24.40	21	-8
Joel Smith	1.292	30	-	-	-	-	-
Toby Bedford *	1.250	31	-	-	-	-	-
Kysaiah Pickett	1.220	32	-	-	-	-	-
Mitchell Brown	0.913	33	-	-	-	-	-
Jayden Hunt	0.908	34	2.092	-56.60	-45.75	23	-11
Average Team Score - Top 22	51.746		59.623	-13.21	8.49

# Hit outs to advantage not captured

* One match only, not an average

Stats courtesy of footywire.com

[Fanatique Demon 2,624]

8 hours ago, Rusty Nails said:

Monash was (is?) a great environment from all reports FD.  Happy to send the excel file if you're interested in browsing / tinkering.  Pretty basic stuff.

Thanks Rusty.

 

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

Rnd 14, 2020 Metricon - Dogs vs Cats

So after that pretty solid turnaround against quality opposition coming from a long way back at quarter time and their recent great form, i just thought i'd take a look how the Cats went this round.

They bat deep at the top with nearly seven players hitting a score of 3+ and their bottom six score is off the charts at 9.775  The only time our bottom six have gone near that was against the lowly Hawks (9.300) and the Roos (8.500).

That team score is big also.  We've bettered that on two occasions, again against the Hawks (56.475) and the Roos (56.750) with our next best (statistical) performance against the Pies (50.800).  Our round three performance against the Cats was our lowest for the year at 37.050  Maybe that's a good thing though given we only lost by three points?

Three players alone had a massive 28 score involvements between them.... Danger with 10 and Stanley / Hawkins with 8 a piece.

Player	Score	Rank
Patrick Dangerfield	4.325	1
Thomas Stewart	4.050	2
Cameron Guthrie	3.550	3
Tom Hawkins #	3.225	4
Jed Bews	3.050	5
Luke Dahlhaus	3.050	5
Rhys Stanley #	3.050	7
Tom Atkins	2.950	8
Brandan Parfitt	2.700	9
Mark O'Connor	2.650	10
Lachlan Henderson	2.625	11
Gary Rohan	2.625	12
Mark Blicavs #	2.575	13
Mitchell Duncan	2.200	14
Jack Henry	2.100	15
Jack Steven	1.950	16
Zach Tuohy	1.800	17
Gryan Miers	1.775	18
Jake Kolodjashnij	1.675	19
Sam Menegola	1.525	20
Bradley Close	1.500	21
Harry Taylor	1.500	21
Team Score	56.450
Top 6	21.250
Bottom 6	9.775

# Hit outs to advantage not captured

Stats courtesy of footywire.com

Edited August 30, 2020 by Rusty Nails

[deanox 9,678]

One thing that jumped out at me this week was how our 6 forwards (Weid, Pickett, Spargo, Brown, Hannan, Melksham) combined for only 43 disposals of our 287, and 3 goals. They were our 6 lowest disposal winners. They are also the bottom 4 and 6 of the bottom 9 in your scoring. 

But then we only had 30 inside 50s (vs 46!). From the heat maps it looked like a of the game was played very deep for us.

 

I know disposals aren't a great measure, or comparable across positions, by it has a big effect here. We won with 12 scoring shots vs geelongs 22: that's a lot more points available for score involvements for example. 3 of Geelongs 6 named forwards are in their top 7 with scores above 3. 

I'm not sure if this is saying "our forwards did enough with what they had" or "our forward line is still a massive problem. It's probably a bit of both.

[deelusions from afar 1,688]

I think Goody is coaching us to play a different style - a bit more keepings off, switch of play and less manic pressure.

Maybe this plan B or maybe it's just about conserving our players energy - especially when there are short breaks.  When we now have a bunch of good users in the back half (May, Hibberd, Salem and Rivers), it makes sense for them to chip it around until we get an opening. 

[58er 6,000]

3 hours ago, deanox said:

One thing that jumped out at me this week was how our 6 forwards (Weid, Pickett, Spargo, Brown, Hannan, Melksham) combined for only 43 disposals of our 287, and 3 goals. They were our 6 lowest disposal winners. They are also the bottom 4 and 6 of the bottom 9 in your scoring. 

But then we only had 30 inside 50s (vs 46!). From the heat maps it looked like a of the game was played very deep for us.

 

I know disposals aren't a great measure, or comparable across positions, by it has a big effect here. We won with 12 scoring shots vs geelongs 22: that's a lot more points available for score involvements for example. 3 of Geelongs 6 named forwards are in their top 7 with scores above 3. 

I'm not sure if this is saying "our forwards did enough with what they had" or "our forward line is still a massive problem. It's probably a bit of both.

Trust me Deanox it's very little of the first and a whole lot of the latter!!!

Somehow 2018 is a distant past fir Melky Hannan and Spargs on a consistent basis.

Even Kossie has lost some of his magic.

Weid is still developing and needs a breakout game ( like Yom Hawkins GF 2011 game) fir 4/5 goals.

Yes our forward entries were low on Sat but maybe it's preferable to 50 and 40 going out on the opposition express to their scoring zone!

But we are kidding ourselves that 12 shots will get us wins consistently.

[Melb-A-Toast 257]

5 hours ago, deanox said:

One thing that jumped out at me this week was how our 6 forwards (Weid, Pickett, Spargo, Brown, Hannan, Melksham) combined for only 43 disposals of our 287, and 3 goals. They were our 6 lowest disposal winners. They are also the bottom 4 and 6 of the bottom 9 in your scoring. 

But then we only had 30 inside 50s (vs 46!). From the heat maps it looked like a of the game was played very deep for us.

 

I know disposals aren't a great measure, or comparable across positions, by it has a big effect here. We won with 12 scoring shots vs geelongs 22: that's a lot more points available for score involvements for example. 3 of Geelongs 6 named forwards are in their top 7 with scores above 3. 

I'm not sure if this is saying "our forwards did enough with what they had" or "our forward line is still a massive problem. It's probably a bit of both.

I think it was influenced by the high volume of turnovers from both teams in the midfield and our half back-line. The ball stayed in that area for too much of the game.

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

7 hours ago, deanox said:

One thing that jumped out at me this week was how our 6 forwards (Weid, Pickett, Spargo, Brown, Hannan, Melksham) combined for only 43 disposals of our 287, and 3 goals. They were our 6 lowest disposal winners. They are also the bottom 4 and 6 of the bottom 9 in your scoring. 

But then we only had 30 inside 50s (vs 46!). From the heat maps it looked like a of the game was played very deep for us.

 

I know disposals aren't a great measure, or comparable across positions, by it has a big effect here. We won with 12 scoring shots vs geelongs 22: that's a lot more points available for score involvements for example. 3 of Geelongs 6 named forwards are in their top 7 with scores above 3. 

I'm not sure if this is saying "our forwards did enough with what they had" or "our forward line is still a massive problem. It's probably a bit of both.

If you looked at the baseline stats as an outsider without knowing the result, i reckon 9 out of 10 would've said Saints must have won that Ox.

So it's a real strange result that some might refer to as an outlier.  If you played it 10 times over the Saints probably win most of them.  We got smashed in the middle.  Steele had a VG game here.  Hill provided great run also.  They won the meters gain count by nearly 500 and as you've mentioned the inside 50 count big time and still lost.  Maxy a bit flat after the lay-off.

So what happened?  It's all been well covered in the other threads but a miserly defence (May / Lever), solid rebound off HB and wing (Ed was super), a match turner from Tracc, amazing last quarter from Clarry and solid work from Viney at stoppages.

Weid was ok but the rest of that forward line was super flakey and is still a real worry.  But yes they might have suffered from a lack of supply on the night.

[Stevienic23 1,183]

We've only beaten Sydney 4 times in our last 20 games against them

[deanox 9,678]

5 hours ago, Rusty Nails said:

If you looked at the baseline stats as an outsider without knowing the result, i reckon 9 out of 10 would've said Saints must have won that Ox.

So it's a real strange result that some might refer to as an outlier.  If you played it 10 times over the Saints probably win most of them.  We got smashed in the middle.  Steele had a VG game here.  Hill provided great run also.  They won the meters gain count by nearly 500 and as you've mentioned the inside 50 count big time and still lost.  Maxy a bit flat after the lay-off.

So what happened?  It's all been well covered in the other threads but a miserly defence (May / Lever), solid rebound off HB and wing (Ed was super), a match turner from Tracc, amazing last quarter from Clarry and solid work from Viney at stoppages.

...

I think this explains it well.

Midfield lost the contested battle.

Defence won it back (good defending or poor delivery inside 50 from the Saimts or both?).

We won the uncontested game (in that our full ground zone meant that the saints uncontested possessions were about maintaining possession, often chipping around the back, while our UPs were attacking or moving up field).

We were more efficient up forward, from limited opportunities. 

 

So putting those things together, the quality/effort of our defensive zoning combined with our ability to move the ball offensively, was more important than winning contested possessions or large numbers of up forward possessions. 

Imagine if we could combine our strong contested ability with our full ground defensive zone effort in the same match!

Some additional info here:

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/804456

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

On 8/31/2020 at 1:39 PM, deanox said:

I think this explains it well.

Midfield lost the contested battle.

Defence won it back (good defending or poor delivery inside 50 from the Saimts or both?).

We won the uncontested game (in that our full ground zone meant that the saints uncontested possessions were about maintaining possession, often chipping around the back, while our UPs were attacking or moving up field).

We were more efficient up forward, from limited opportunities. 

 

So putting those things together, the quality/effort of our defensive zoning combined with our ability to move the ball offensively, was more important than winning contested possessions or large numbers of up forward possessions. 

Imagine if we could combine our strong contested ability with our full ground defensive zone effort in the same match!

Some additional info here:

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/804456

Reading this again Ox, are we seeing some similarities (albeit we are still a fair way off their level and obviously with many differences to each list) to the way the Tigers play?

It wouldn't surprise me to be reading this article about a scrappy Tiger win a la last night's vs the Dockers as this excerpt demonstrates...

..."Melbourne’s inability to compete with the Saints in the centre proved to be an issue for a lot of Saturday night’s game, but it was able to win the ball back around the ground and lift its intensity after half-time..."

Not sure if it's just a one off but maybe losing the mid field clearance count isn't such a bad thing if we are covering the outside and winning it back around the ground (at stoppages) and on the turnover.

The Tigers get most of their scores from turnovers rather clearance work.  Would be interesting to see some info on which area we had been scoring from in past season or two and even the first half of this one vs the second half of this one or even the last 5 to 6 rounds.

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

Rnd 14, 2020 TIO - Swans vs Demons

Team score, allowing for this season's 20% less game time, was 3% off the 2019 average and 14% lower than 2018's.  Against one of the worst performing team's this season.  Abysmal.

Seen a few low individual scores over the years but rarely a negative.  Weid's performance easily one of the worst (statistically) in the Red & Blue by any listed player since 2018.  Jones, well i won't bother checking but that would be his worst since i've been recording these, and by a massive margin.

Yet another sad day in the history of this club.  Once the going gets a little tough and we are expected to win comfortably, it doesn't matter which playing group or coach is heading them, it finds a new way of dissapointing.

Player	Score	Rank
Clayton Oliver	4.350	1
Ed Langdon	3.375	2
Steven May	2.950	3
James Harmes	2.900	4
Adam Tomlinson	2.850	5
Alex N-Bullen	2.850	6
Jake Lever	2.600	7
Trent Rivers	2.525	8
Max Gawn #	2.500	9
Angus Brayshaw	2.500	10
Bayley Fritsch	2.250	11
Jake Melksham	2.000	12
Christian Salem	1.950	13
Joshua Wagner	1.875	14
Jack Viney	1.850	15
Charlie Spargo	1.450	16
Mitchell Brown	1.375	17
Oscar McDonald #	1.375	17
Christian Petracca	1.325	19
Joel Smith	0.600	20
Nathan Jones	0.450	21
Sam Weideman	-0.200	22
Team Score	45.700
Top 6	19.275
Bottom 6	4.925

# Hit outs to advantage not captured

Stats courtesy of footywire.com

Edited September 3, 2020 by Rusty Nails

[buck_nekkid 5,819]

Did you mean Swans?

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

5 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

Did you mean Swans?

Thanks BN ... bad arvo period.

[buck_nekkid 5,819]

27 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

Thanks BN ... bad arvo period.

I know what you mean...the numbers are frightening. Very very troubling.  So many players had mares.

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

Weighted Averages up to and including Rnd 15, 2020

Player	2020 Weighted Score	2020 Rank	2019 Weighted Score	% Change vs 2019	% Change vs 2019 w/ 20% time adjusted	2019 Rank	Change in Rank vs 2019
Clayton Oliver	4.211	1	4.880	-13.71	7.86	1	0
Christian Petracca	3.609	2	2.843	26.94	58.68	9	7
Max Gawn #	3.045	3	3.437	-11.41	10.74	4	1
Jack Viney	2.913	4	3.258	-10.59	11.76	5	1
Christian Salem	2.850	5	3.658	-22.09	-2.61	3	-2
Steven May	2.839	6	2.618	8.44	35.55	14	8
Ed Langdon	2.825	7	-	-	-	-	-
Angus Brayshaw	2.589	8	3.131	-17.31	3.36	6	-2
Michael Hibberd	2.338	9	2.339	-0.04	24.95	19	10
Jake Lever	2.300	10	2.519	-8.69	14.13	16	6
James Harmes	2.262	11	4.039	-44.00	-30.00	2	-9
Tom Sparrow	2.150	12	1.275	68.63	110.78	37	25
Alex N-Bullen	2.050	13	2.120	-3.30	20.87	22	9
Adam Tomlinson #	2.025	14	-	-	-	-	-
Braydon Preuss #	1.875	15	1.643	14.12	42.65	33	18
Harley Bennell	1.850	16	-	-	-	-	-
Trent Rivers	1.758	17	-	-	-	-	-
Bayley Fritsch	1.687	18	2.809	-39.94	-24.93	10	-8
Oscar McDonald #	1.682	19	1.956	-14.01	7.49	26	7
Tom McDonald #	1.675	20	2.297	-27.08	-8.85	20	0
Jay Lockhart	1.650	21	1.819	-9.29	13.39	30	9
Nathan Jones	1.638	22	2.907	-43.65	-29.57	7	-15
Mitchell Hannan	1.506	23	1.433	5.09	31.37	36	13
Luke Jackson #	1.463	24	-	-	-	-	-
Sam Weideman	1.420	25	1.895	-25.07	-6.33	27	2
Aaron Vandenburg	1.394	26	-	-	-	-	-
Charlie Spargo	1.375	27	1.513	-9.12	13.60	35	8
Jake Melksham	1.368	28	2.181	-37.28	-21.60	21	-7
Neville Jetta	1.355	29	2.264	-40.15	-25.19	18	-11
Toby Bedford *	1.250	30	-	-	-	-	-
Kysaiah Pickett	1.220	31	-	-	-	-	-
Joel Smith	1.119	32	-	-	-	-	-
Mitchell Brown	1.067	33	-	-	-	-	-
Jayden Hunt	0.908	34	2.092	-56.60	-45.75	23	-11
Average Team Score - Top 22	51.821		59.623	-13.09	8.64

# Hit outs to advantage not captured

* One match only, not an average

Stats courtesy of footywire.com

Edited September 4, 2020 by Rusty Nails

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

Rnd 15, 2020 Cazaly's Stadium - Demons vs Dockers

Pretty much a repeat of the Rnd 3 match vs the Cats with SG effectively giving up the forward half of the ground and keeping a spare behind the ball early, almost as if he had conceded the match from the get go.  And that we did, with the Dockers constantly peppering the goals early and probably should have had a bigger lead at quarter time given the breeze and the amount of time in their forward half.

IMHO this is a strategy only worth using to ice a quarter, a game or to maybe prevent the opp from scoring further after a 3 to 4 goal run on.  This is NOT the way you want to play assuming you want to win games at this level, aside from those reasons listed.  I'm not sure why SG believes this is the way to set up at any stage in a match otherwise.  That he does so from the get go beggars belief.  But, we've seen it before so i guess history repeats when the coach doesn't learn from his past errors.

After the monsoon started, we then continued to look to handball more often than not and look for sharp passing up the line.  We also left the fat side open much of the time (our forward half robbed to have the spare down back enhancing this insane strat) inviting them to switch much of the time, which they did.  All this happened right from the first bounce, allowing Freo to rack up easy possessions out the back.  They had the ball, we didn't.  Brought many of their players in to touch and they got their tails / confidence up.  Terrible terrible coaching on our part at this level.  For an ordinary club at VFL level this wouldn't be acceptable for long, let alone AFL level.

After nearly 4 seasons i can only assume he is a VERY poor coach with little understanding of the "why/how & the who" that's required to set up the team to win on a regular basis.  A great example of this is to leave Lockhart out and bring Pruess in, leaving us short a small defender down back (weather forecast MFC....anyone home!?) and playing Walters in to some long missing form.  Awful awful coaching at all levels including match day selection.  The MFC has never heard of using a last minute emergency to cater for the conditions?

Our worst team score for the season and our 2nd worst bottom 6 score for the year behind Rnd 8 vs the Lions.

Rain obviously playing a part so not taking any stats too seriously here but our team score, allowing for this season's 20% less game time, was a massive 22% off the awful 2019 average and 30% lower than 2018's.  Against one of the worst performing team's this season.  Finals on the line and can't get over the line two weeks in a row against two bog ordinary teams.  Amateur hour from the MFC.... yet again.

Player	Score	Rank
Christian Petracca	3.600	1
Jack Viney	3.450	2
Max Gawn #	2.825	3
Trent Rivers	2.775	4
Clayton Oliver	2.450	5
Aaron Vandenberg	2.300	6
Bayley Fritsch	2.150	7
Oskar Baker	1.650	8
Ed Langdon	1.550	9
Jake Lever	1.525	10
Steven May	1.525	11
Sam Weideman	1.375	12
Jake Melksham	1.175	13
Michael Hibberd	1.125	14
Adam Tomlinson	1.000	15
Joel Smith	0.950	16
Kysaiah Pickett	0.950	16
Jayden Hunt	0.650	18
Christian Salem	0.650	19
Toby Bedford	0.600	20
Braydon Preuss	0.225	21
Alex N-Bullen	0.000	22
Team Score	34.500
Top 6	17.400
Bottom 6	3.075

# Hit outs to advantage not captured

Stats courtesy of footywire.com

Edited September 8, 2020 by Rusty Nails

[Demon Dynasty 17,094]

Weighted Averages up to and including Rnd 16, 2020

Player	2020 Weighted Score	2020 Rank	2019 Weighted Score	% Change vs 2019	% Change vs 2019 w/ 20% time adjusted	2019 Rank	Change in Rank vs 2019
Clayton Oliver	4.093	1	4.880	-16.13	4.84	1	0
Christian Petracca	3.608	2	2.843	26.91	58.64	9	7
Max Gawn #	3.027	3	3.437	-11.93	10.09	4	1
Jack Viney	2.952	4	3.258	-9.39	13.26	5	1
Steven May	2.752	5	2.618	5.12	31.40	14	9
Ed Langdon	2.740	6	-	-	-	-	-
Christian Salem	2.693	7	3.658	-26.38	-7.98	3	-4
Angus Brayshaw	2.589	8	3.131	-17.31	3.36	6	-2
James Harmes	2.262	9	4.039	-44.00	-30.00	2	-7
Jake Lever	2.248	10	2.519	-10.76	11.55	16	6
Michael Hibberd	2.244	11	2.339	-4.06	19.92	19	8
Tom Sparrow	2.150	12	1.275	68.63	110.78	37	25
Adam Tomlinson #	1.932	13	-	-	-	-	-
Trent Rivers	1.904	14	-	-	-	-	-
Harley Bennell	1.850	15	-	-	-	-	-
Bayley Fritsch	1.720	16	2.809	-38.77	-23.46	10	-6
Oscar McDonald #	1.682	17	1.956	-14.01	7.49	26	9
Tom McDonald #	1.675	18	2.297	-27.08	-8.85	20	2
Jay Lockhart	1.650	19	1.819	-9.29	13.39	30	11
Oskar Baker *	1.650	19	1.714	-3.73	20.33	29	10
Alex N-Bullen	1.640	21	2.120	-22.64	-3.30	22	1
Nathan Jones	1.638	22	2.907	-43.65	-29.57	7	-15
Mitchell Hannan	1.506	23	1.433	5.09	31.37	36	13
Jake Melksham	1.488	24	2.181	-31.77	-14.72	21	-3
Aaron Vandenburg	1.485	25	-	-	-	-	-
Luke Jackson #	1.463	26	-	-	-	-	-
Sam Weideman	1.416	27	1.895	-25.28	-6.60	27	0
Charlie Spargo	1.375	28	1.513	-9.12	13.60	35	7
Neville Jetta	1.355	29	2.264	-40.15	-25.19	18	-11
Braydon Preuss #	1.325	30	1.643	-19.35	0.81	33	3
Kysaiah Pickett	1.198	31	-	-	-	-	-
Joel Smith	1.085	32	-	-	-	-	-
Mitchell Brown	1.067	33	-	-	-	-	-
Toby Bedford	0.925	34	-	-	-	-	-
Jayden Hunt	0.844	35	2.092	-59.66	-49.57	23	-12
Average Team Score - Top 22	50.699		59.623	-14.97	6.29

# Hit outs to advantage not captured

* One match only, not an average

Stats courtesy of footywire.com