Jump to content

Featured Replies

41 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So we give it up for an 18 year old and wait 3 years?i know the logic, you are going by. 

Papley including goal assists is worth 2-3 goals a game. He is ready to go. 
The MFC needs to play finals next season
 

Roll the dice....

Not necessarily. You don't just give up a top 10 pick for a small forward who averages a goal and a bit a game. You aim for a B+/A grader with a top 10 pick.

Edited by A F

 

I would trade Pick 8 for Papley & a late pick to secure Isaac Smith.

Papley is a very good player. 

10 minutes ago, A F said:

Not necessarily. You don't just give up a top 10 pick for a small forward who averages a goal and a bit a game. You aim for a B+/A grader with a top 10 pick.

And who might that be in this draft?

You are going by the book, i am going outside the square?

 

 
41 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

And who might that be in this draft?

You are going by the book, i am going outside the square?

 

I'll leave that up to our recruiters.

And no, I'm going by 'don't blow our cap on a one goal a game small forward'.

Edited by A F

32 minutes ago, A F said:

I'll leave that up to our recruiters.

And no, I'm going by 'don't blow our cap on a one goal a game small forward'.

So who is going to increase our Goal Kicking output next year?

Papley is a good player

I take little notice of numbers since Scully & Trengove...

We need Players for the now


40 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So who is going to increase our Goal Kicking output next year?

Papley is a good player

I take little notice of numbers since Scully & Trengove...

We need Players for the now

Papley isn't going to significantly increase it. 

Like I said, if Papley was cheaper, I'd look for a trade, but not pick 3 and not if his wage/asking price is ridiculous. 

I'm glad you're not running the club mate. 

3 minutes ago, A F said:

Papley isn't going to significantly increase it. 

Like I said, if Papley was cheaper, I'd look for a trade, but not pick 3 and not if his wage/asking price is ridiculous. 

I'm glad you're not running the club mate. 

You don’t rate Papley, I do, and i am not the only one who does. We missed Elliott so who is the next target?

who takes the spot of Garlett? 
 

Pick 8 can be used wisely i hope...

Just now, Sir Why You Little said:

You don’t rate Papley, I do, and i am not the only one who does. We missed Elliott so who is the next target?

who takes the spot of Garlett? 
 

Pick 8 can be used wisely i hope...

If Pick 8 got Papley i would 100% do it.

Papley, Langdon and Tomlinson in via trades and using Pick 3 to get the best kid we can would = the best trade period we've had.

 

Pick 8 for Papley and Sydney's 3rd round pick I'd take.  Then look at the next few weeks splitting pick 3. 

8 minutes ago, MurDoc516 said:

If Pick 8 got Papley i would 100% do it.

Papley, Langdon and Tomlinson in via trades and using Pick 3 to get the best kid we can would = the best trade period we've had.

Agreed. We need Senior Players ready to go

Pick 3 can be left alone...


50 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

You don’t rate Papley, I do, and i am not the only one who does. We missed Elliott so who is the next target?

who takes the spot of Garlett? 
 

Pick 8 can be used wisely i hope...

Hang on a second. I do rate Papley. I just don't rate him as a B+ or A grader. I'm not sure many would.

26 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So who is going to increase our Goal Kicking output next year?

Papley is a good player

I take little notice of numbers since Scully & Trengove...

We need Players for the now

what about the upgrading to pick 4 to get Oliver ? numbers can be important.

Daniher deal might be off if you believe this.  Where does that leave Papley i wonder...

Joe Daniher not going anywhere, according to Tim Watson @7NewsMelbourne

Edited by Rusty Nails


3 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Not with pick 9 i wouldn't think

Carlton could include a future pick in the Papley deal. 

I'd rather Weightman at 8 than Papley.

Papley would cost too much, both in terms of pick and contract.

Desperately clutching at straws to combine goal assist stats and goals kicked to rate him. Fools gold.

Edited by Moonshadow

47 minutes ago, Bay Riffin said:

what about the upgrading to pick 4 to get Oliver ? numbers can be important.

I am talking this year. 
who is going to kick goals for us Now?


 

You think SOS is gonna fight Dodoro in the parking lot because he wouldn't give up Daniher and give them the run at Papley?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
      • Haha
    • 51 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 177 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 32 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

    • 546 replies
  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 287 replies