Jump to content

The Huns best 25 over a 50 year period

picket fence
picket fence
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

nah, he was a thug, plain and simple. sure, he wasn't the only thug in his era, but that doesn't mean he wasn't any less of a thug

there is a difference between a thug and a 'hard' player

I agree he was a thug - just that many other players were more thuggish than him, and all of them less talented.    

  • Quote
    •  
    15 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    He may well be the only VFL player to have faced that scrutiny but many more players were more thuggish than Matthews. His prosecution was media motivated and while what he did to Bruns was unacceptable, he was "unlucky" to be made the scapegoat for on-field, off-the-ball violence. Many players from that same era are lucky not to have longer "criminal records" for essentially similar behaviour. 

    In my mind, Matthews does not have a mixed legacy because of this or his other violent acts. He just played the game hard like many others but (in my opinion) better than anyone else in the last 50 years.

    Are you serious?

    Stephen Smith still has trouble sleeping because of Matthews king hit behind the play from decades ago

    Do you understand that?

  • Quote
    2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    Are you serious?

    Stephen Smith still has trouble sleeping because of Matthews king hit behind the play from decades ago

    Do you understand that?

    I'm not quite sure what you think I've misunderstood. All I was saying was that while Matthews was a thug, there were others far worse than him and none of them with his talent. Given the precedent set by Matthews being charged, players such as Ron Andrews, Robert Muir, Carl Ditterich, David Rhys-Jones, Jim O'Dea and many others too talentless to remember should consider themselves lucky not to have seen the inside of a courtroom in response to their exploits on the field.

  • Quote
    •  
    52 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    I'm not quite sure what you think I've misunderstood. All I was saying was that while Matthews was a thug, there were others far worse than him and none of them with his talent. Given the precedent set by Matthews being charged, players such as Ron Andrews, Robert Muir, Carl Ditterich, David Rhys-Jones, Jim O'Dea and many others too talentless to remember should consider themselves lucky not to have seen the inside of a courtroom in response to their exploits on the field.

    Matthews was a level up on all those players you have mentioned

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    I agree he was a thug - just that many other players were more thuggish than him, and all of them less talented.    

    yes, but originally you implied he wasn't a thug just a 'hard' man. ok you've retreated somewhat from that

    Quote

    In my mind, Matthews does not have a mixed legacy because of this or his other violent acts. He just played the game hard like many others but (in my opinion) better than anyone else in the last 50 years.

     

  • Quote

    1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

    yes, but originally you implied he wasn't a thug just a 'hard' man. ok you've retreated somewhat from that

     

    You didn't see the air quotes I was using?

    I didn't mean to imply that Matthews wasn't a thug. I was trying more to explain that thuggish player was not uncommon and that he wasn't the worst in that regard. If I remember correctly, the reason why he was charged over the Neville Bruns incident was because the then VFL had not taken enough action to clean up "behind the play" incidents which subsequently put pressure on the police to act. 

    And I know it's a subjective argument, but I respectfully don't agree with SWYL. I think all the players I mentioned above were more "thuggish" than Matthews.

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    Matthews was a level up on all those players you have mentioned

    Make it 10 levels. 

    He kicked 91 goals from the midfield when he was 25.  Won a B&F as a teenager in a premiership year. 

  • Quote
    10 minutes ago, ProDee said:

    Make it 10 levels. 

    He kicked 91 goals from the midfield when he was 25.  Won a B&F as a teenager in a premiership year. 

    Yes i know all that. He was also excessively violent throughout his long career. I saw a lot of it

  • Quote
    •  

    Balmey claimed 3 victims in the '73 GF ...  Waite, Southby & McKay.  All knocked senseless from king hits.

    It was a different game back then and there were any number of thugs going around ... those who didn't make to VFL or VFA level terrorised their way through the suburban ranks. 

    The modern game is unbelievably clean by comparison.  These days players get rubbed out for a slightly misplaced hip & shoulder. 

    As good as Matthews was there was no better pure footballer than Gary Ablett sr.   He had everything and could throw one too.  Carey, Matthews, Jezza & Flower round out my top 5.

    Robbie would have won 2 or 3 Brownlows if he'd played in better performed teams - he was that good.  Jesaulenko was a freak who had 'Ablett' like qualities.

     

  • Quote
    2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    Yes i know all that. He was also excessively violent throughout his long career. I saw a lot of it

    The difference between us seems to be that I don't care that he performed thuggish acts.  I genuinely couldn't give a rat's toss bag.

    I judge him on his footy prowess.  Oh for him to have been a Melbourne player. 

    Clearly, we see things differently.   I get it.

  • Quote

    8 minutes ago, ProDee said:

    The difference between us seems to be that I don't care that he performed thuggish acts.  I genuinely couldn't give a rat's toss bag.

    I judge him on his footy prowess.  Oh for him to have been a Melbourne player. 

    Clearly, we see things differently.   I get it.

    You couldn't give a rat's toss bag

    says it all. 

    You ever been king hit from behind?

  • Quote
    11 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    You couldn't give a rat's toss bag

    says it all. 

    You ever been king hit from behind?

    I have once.  Ended up in hispital. Nothing to do with you though.  It's life.

    Those agrieved by Matthews' unlawful attack on their person are well justified, if that's their view.  That's their business. 

    I'm not invested in their concerns.  I'll leave that to them.

    I loved Matthews the player.  My choice. 

     

  • Quote

    Let's not forget that he also delivered the filth its first flag in 32 years , also that mo he was sporting in the 80s was considerably offensive. 

  • Quote
    46 minutes ago, ProDee said:

    I have once.  Ended up in hispital. Nothing to do with you though.  It's life.

    Those agrieved by Matthews' unlawful attack on their person are well justified, if that's their view.  That's their business. 

    I'm not invested in their concerns.  I'll leave that to them.

    I loved Matthews the player.  My choice. 

     

    You are one strange person

    your choice

  • Quote
    11 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    You are one strange person

    your choice

    No, I just don't take the actions of someone else to someone else personally.   Why would I ?

    The bloke played 330 odd games in one of the toughest eras of footy and yes, commiited some brutal acts.   Like hundreds of others.

    He's the best player I've seen and would have loved him in red and blue.   One thing I ain't is a hypocrite. 

    This is going nowhere.  As I said, I get you don't get it.  Let's move on. 

  • Quote

    1 hour ago, ProDee said:

    The difference between us seems to be that I don't care that he performed thuggish acts.  I genuinely couldn't give a rat's toss bag.

    I judge him on his footy prowess.  Oh for him to have been a Melbourne player. 

    Clearly, we see things differently.   I get it.

    Interesting thoughts Pro, so the ends justifies the means then? And I do think that was Alan Jean's motto.

    That is If I have to take out every opponent by whatever means to kick my 10 goals to win a game then all is justified. Fook the rules of the game then, and if they didn't exist, there wouldn't be a game. 

    I have different values and I know those with questionable moral values often win the contest, it doesn't mean I need to respect them. 

  • Quote
    2 hours ago, ProDee said:

    .  Oh for him to have been a Melbourne player. 

     

    He nearly was later in his career.

    We offered him $40k a year on a multi year contract, a fortune at the time and if not for the Hawks matching or getting very close, he would have been ours.

    BTW, IMO, the best player I have seen and the first I would pick in my side.

    Just to mention him again, the most talented I have seen, the great Tulip.

     

  • Quote
    42 minutes ago, Earl Hood said:

    Interesting thoughts Pro, so the ends justifies the means then? And I do think that was Alan Jean's motto.

    That is If I have to take out every opponent by whatever means to kick my 10 goals to win a game then all is justified. Fook the rules of the game then, and if they didn't exist, there wouldn't be a game. 

    I have different values and I know those with questionable moral values often win the contest, it doesn't mean I need to respect them. 

    I don't concede that you have better "values" than me at all. 

    Just a different perspective. 

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, ProDee said:

    No, I just don't take the actions of someone else to someone else personally.   Why would I ?

    The bloke played 330 odd games in one off the toughest eras of footy and yes, commiited some brutal acts.   Like hundreds of others.

    He's the best player I've seen and would have loved him in red and blue.   One thing I ain't is a hypocrite. 

    This is going nowhere.  As I said, I get you don't get it.  Let's move on. 

    So you would King Hit someone from behind in order to win a game?

    yes or no

    and stop saying "i don't get it" i do. 

     

  • Quote
    9 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    So you would King Hit someone from behind in order to win a game?

    yes or no

    and stop saying "i don't get it" i do. 

     

    Matthews never king hit anyone to win a game, those acts were never premeditated imo, they happened on the spur of the moment.

    No need to have a tennis match over this.  I loved the way he played and you're disgusted by the way he played.  You're welcome to your view and I assume (you agree) I'm welcome to mine. 

  • Quote

    My late hawthorn supporting grandmother almost disowned me when as a young tacker I snorted at her stuffed Matthews figure and labeled him nothing but a thug.  I didn't really mean the 'nothing but', however it did define him so far as I was and am concerned. 

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • GAMEDAY: Sydney

      It’s Game Day, and the Demons have a golden opportunity to build on last week’s stirring win by toppling Sydney at the MCG. A victory today would keep them firmly in the hunt for a finals spot and help them stay in touch with the pack chasing a place in the Top 8. Can the Dees make it two in a row and bring down the Swans?

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 69 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • Casey: Northern Bullants

      The Casey Demons travelled to a windy Cramer Street, Preston yesterday and blew the Northern Bullants off the ground for three quarters before shutting up shop in the final term, coasting to a much-needed 71-point victory after leading by almost 15 goals at one stage. It was a pleasing performance that revived the Demons’ prospects for the 2025 season but, at the same time, very little can be taken from the game because of the weak opposition. These days, the Bullants are little more than road kill. The once proud club, situated behind the Preston Market in a now culturally diverse area, is currently facing significant financial and on-field challenges, having failed to secure a win to date in 2025.

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 11

      Round 11, the second week of The Sir Doug Nicholls Round, kicks off on Thursday night with the Cats hosting the Bulldogs at Kardinia Park. Geelong will be looking to to continue their decade long dominance over the Bulldogs, while the Dogs aim to take another big scalp as they surge up the ladder. On Friday night it's he Dreamtime at the 'G clash between Essendon and Richmond. The Bombers will want to avoid another embarrassing performance against a lowly side whilst the Tigers will be keen to avenge a disappointing loss to the Kangaroos. Saturday footy kicks off as the Blues face the Giants in a pivotal clash for both clubs. Carlton need to turn around their up and down season while GWS will be eager to bounce back and reassert themselves as a September threat. At twilight sees the Hawks taking on the Lions at the G. Hawthorn need to cement themselves in the Top 4 but they’ll need to be at their best to challenge a Brisbane side eager to respond after last week’s crushing loss to the Dees on their home turf. The first of the Saturday night double headers opens with North Melbourne up against the high-flying Magpies. The Roos will need a near-perfect performance to trouble a Collingwood side sitting atop the ladder.

        • Thanks
      • 332 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Sydney

      The two teams competing at the MCG on Sunday afternoon have each traversed a long and arduous path since their previous encounter on a sweltering March evening in Sydney a season and a half ago. Both experienced periods of success at various times last year. The Demons ran out of steam in midseason while the Swans went on to narrowly miss the ultimate prize in the sport. Now, they find themselves outside of finals contention as the season approaches the halfway mark. The winner this week will remain in contact with the leading pack, while the loser may well find itself on a precipice, staring into the abyss. The current season has presented numerous challenges for most clubs, particularly those positioned in the middle tier. The Essendon experience in suffering a significant 91-point loss to the Bulldogs, just one week after defeating the Swans, may not be typical, but it illustrates the unpredictability of outcomes under the league’s present set up. 

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 16 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Brisbane

      “Max Gawn has been the heart and soul of the Dees for years now, but this recent recovery from a terrible start has been driven by him. He was everywhere again, and with the game in the balance, he took several key marks to keep the ball in the Dees forward half.” - The Monday Knee Jerk Reaction: Round Ten Of course, it wasn’t the efforts of one man that caused this monumental upset, but rather the work of the coach and his assistants and the other 22 players who took the ground, notably the likes of Jake Melksham, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kozzie Pickett but Max has been magnificent in taking ownership of his team and its welfare under the fire of a calamitous 0-5 start to the season. On Sunday, he provided the leadership that was needed to face up to the reigning premier and top of the ladder Brisbane Lions on their home turf and to prevail after a slow start, during which the hosts led by as much as 24 points in the second quarter. Titus O’Reily is normally comedic in his descriptions of the football but this time, he was being deadly serious. The Demons have come from a long way back and, although they still sit in the bottom third of the AFL pack, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel as they look to drive home the momentum inspired in the past four or five weeks by Max the Magnificent who was under such great pressure in those dark, early days of the season.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Southport

      The Southport Sharks came to Casey. They saw and they conquered a team with 16 AFL-listed players who, for the most part, wasted their time on the ground and failed to earn their keep. For the first half, the Sharks were kept in the game by the Demons’ poor use of the football, it’s disposal getting worse the closer the team got to its own goal and moreover, it got worse as the game progressed. Make no mistake, Casey was far and away the better team in the first half, it was winning the ruck duels through Tom Campbell’s solid performance but it was the scoreboard that told the story.

        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All