Plowman 're-signed with gws today so he Is no longer an option

can still be traded can't he? if the right deal came along?

He can mate, but it hurts the chances imo

Absolute rubbish.

Averaging 22 disposals 1 less then Tyson and 5 tackles a game this year which is 3 more then his mate. Would compliment our young impressive midfield just perfectly.

This site under the rules and regulTions allows us to have our say...I believe he is not up to the wants and needs we require ..I would prefer Membrey as a late pick.

Sometimes players get the ball - it is what they do with it...again it is my opinion - he is not the right pick for us...and I take offence that you are allied to call an opinion rubbish...

Yes, well we're all aware of your opinions...

How's Serhat Temel tracking?

Coniglio is a gun.

Yes, well we're all aware of your opinions...

How's Serhat Temel tracking?

Coniglio is a gun.

Good to see you're still making friends Machsy

I would put Howe on the trade table. Good player but more of a nice to have. GWS would pay overs for him.

I wonder if we could deal with North for a player and their #13 pick so they could get Brayshaw?

I do not think we can deliver Brayshaw to Norf, Franky. That might be considered draft tampering.

If he wants to go, could we get Bryce Gibbs for Frawley? Yes, I said it

Get Christian Petrecca. Full stop. He is a gun. Tough and skilled. Ready to play round 1 in 2015.

If he wants to go, could we get Bryce Gibbs for Frawley? Yes, I said it

Which part of "free agent" don't you understand..?

I would put Howe on the trade table. Good player but more of a nice to have. GWS would pay overs for him.

Not now that he's doing well down halfback, & helping setup play with his kicking & run. He's developing more versatility, & is showing he is prepared to work harder, & not just do the flash stuff.

He's a keeper, unless GWS want to trade Cameron for him & a pick?

Not now that he's doing well down halfback, & helping setup play with his kicking & run. He's developing more versatility, & is showing he is prepared to work harder, & not just do the flash stuff.

He's a keeper, unless GWS want to trade Cameron for him & a pick?

1 first rounder pick wont get us too much, we ll need some currency and Howe is great currency.

Teams wont give us up good players for Blease Strauss or Tapscott unfortunately

1 first rounder pick wont get us too much, we ll need some currency and Howe is great currency.

Teams wont give us up good players for Blease Strauss or Tapscott unfortunately

thats true, but for a player who wants out of GWS to return home; a top 6 pick would get a deal done for a young player who hasn't yet scorched this Old Earth.

for a Shiel or a Treloar.

If your talking about Cameron, then a bit more for him.

Fair call Machsy. Ok, I hope we're trying to get Bryce Gibbs

Fair call Machsy. Ok, I hope we're trying to get Bryce Gibbs

STN, don't rush to apologize there or pander. He's a know all.

Edited June 13, 201411 yr by Return to Glory

Haha. It was a pander RTG. Refocusing my statement for old Machsy

STN, don't rush to apologize there or pander. He's a know all.

Gotta say, it's better than being a "know nothing" like you, RTG...

Peter Wright dominant in ruck for Metro today, Petracca and Brayshaw also amongst the best in Metro's first win for the champs:

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-06-14/vic-metro-defeats-sa

Stretch named in the best again, albeit one of the last few named.

Gotta say, it's better than being a "know nothing" like you, RTG...

I know you're a [censored]. That's something isn't it?

It's interesting that we went into the Championships expecting that talls would dominate the top ten in the draft. There would be three mids and a utility in there now for mine.

I know you're a [censored]. That's something isn't it?

There's a reason I have you on ignore.

Silly me for thinking you might have made a meaningful contribution for once.

Machsy=F LOG

Edited June 14, 201411 yr by thedeeman

There's a reason I have you on ignore.

Silly me for thinking you might have made a meaningful contribution for once.

Oh no RTF, not ignore.

There's a reason I have you on ignore.

Silly me for thinking you might have made a meaningful contribution for once.

So if you have me on ignore, how did you respond to my post brains?