Seems a few noisy numpties are carpet-bombing the site with anti-Neeld diatribes at the moment.

Let's see what kind of support they have among Melbourne supporters.

Simple yes or no poll.

Edited July 30, 201213 yr by Range Rover

Before you vote, please read the thread, 'total faith in the neeld way'.

Healthy debate about the subject.

Before you vote, please read the thread, 'total faith in the neeld way'.

Healthy debate about the subject.

I've read that thread and the one thing it doesn't address is just what a frigging cess pool would be left if we removed another coach and who his replacement would be, therefore to suggest Neeld be removed is a totally moronic suggestion. I despair for the capacity to think clearly of those who vote in favour of his removal.

Seems a few noisy numpties are carpet-bombing the site with anti-Neeld diatribes at the moment.

Let's see what kind of support they have among Melbourne supporters.

Simple yes or no poll.

Nice impartial introduction to a poll!

What if we can replace him with Roos or malthouse?

Would our club be better off?

What if we can replace him with Roos or malthouse?

Would our club be better off?

Roos has said he doesn't wnat to coach and our club stands for nothing, does that sound like he wants to enter an application? How the hell would you get Malthouse to replace his former, sacked assistant? Aren't we trying to build integrity around our club?

Wow... Worst poll ever.

If people are genuinely calling for the sack then we know who to ignore, but my impression is that most who are being labelled with that are either calling for more accountability of the coaching staff and/or questioning why the same posters saying "you don't know if he's bad or not, needs more time" are also saying "I have faith in Neeld".

It's a circular argument, and pretty obviously this poll was started and worded in such a way as for point scoring by certain posters.

Henceforth, I won't be voting in this thread, and I'm TOTALLY SICK of the same 4-5 posters over running every thread with their name calling and off topic posts.

STOP RUINING DEMONLAND.

What if we can replace him with Roos or malthouse?

Would our club be better off?

What if What if, that's about the extent if your thinking. Did you read the on the couch thread? Roos thinks we are irrelevant as a club and this is the man who you would have as coach, Jesus H Christ do you ever think things through or do you think that by just spouting out a name as coach it will napped? What about we try for Clarkson or maybe Buckley or perhaps Hird, we might even give Barras another go.

Malthoouse pushed Neeld to the front when we were looking for a coach he recommended him; do you seriously think he would now undermine him.

Wow... Worst poll ever.

If people are genuinely calling for the sack then we know who to ignore, but my impression is that most who are being labelled with that are either calling for more accountability of the coaching staff and/or questioning why the same posters saying "you don't know if he's bad or not, needs more time" are also saying "I have faith in Neeld".

It's a circular argument, and pretty obviously this poll was started and worded in such a way as for point scoring by certain posters.

Henceforth, I won't be voting in this thread, and I'm TOTALLY SICK of the same 4-5 posters over running every thread with their name calling and off topic posts.

STOP RUINING DEMONLAND.

The poll couldn't be any more simply worded.

Don't like the results Stu?

12 - 1 ... not looking good for the anti-Neeldists.

The poll couldn't be any more simply worded.

Don't like the results Stu?

12 - 1 ... not looking good for the anti-Neeldists.

No idea what the results are, and frankly don't care.

This poll is an obvious point scoring thread set up by you and is one of the more immature things I've seen on Demonland (which is saying something).

You guys have already ruined one thread (at least) and now you're starting new ones for your pi55ing contests.

No idea what the results are, and frankly don't care.

This poll is an obvious point scoring thread set up by you and is one of the more immature things I've seen on Demonland (which is saying something).

You guys have already ruined one thread (at least) and now you're starting new ones for your pi55ing contests.

Clearly you do care or you wouldn't bother posting here.

Clearly you do care or you wouldn't bother posting here.

Nice try mate. But once again you miss the point in your eternal quest to start conflict.

I posted here, and reported this thread, because I'm sick of this rubbish back and forth you keep going with other posters that is repetitive and not related to our football club.

Grow up.

Nice try mate. But once again you miss the point in your eternal quest to start conflict.

I posted here, and reported this thread, because I'm sick of this rubbish back and forth you keep going with other posters that is repetitive and not related to our football club.

Grow up.

It's just a simple poll, Stu. You really are getting your knickers in a twist over it.

13 - 1.

It's just a simple poll, Stu. You really are getting your knickers in a twist over it.

13 - 1.

Your motives are transparent for someone who always accuses others of "agendas".

Your motives are transparent for someone who always accuses others of "agendas".

I don't cast others' votes for them, Stu.

I'm for Neeld. No issue with that. Think he'll be there next year and help us get some success.

Seems a few others think the same eh?

I don't cast others' votes for them, Stu.

I'm for Neeld. No issue with that. Think he'll be there next year and help us get some success.

Seems a few others think the same eh?

I'm sure they do, as do I, but as I pointed out in the "Faith in Neeld" thread, there's more to it than a simple yes and no, and you know that, hence the "simple" poll.

Funnily enough you chose to reply to this post and not the other one which was actually about football...

Before you vote, please read the thread, 'total faith in the neeld way'.

Healthy debate about the subject.

Just voted for Neeld.

Seems I'm in the majority by a long way.

Tona-the wheels are falling off your barrow .

gotta give him one more year although if no improvement....OUT

Nice impartial introduction to a poll!

and you could have just as easily started a poll yourself... butyou didnt. So wear it

Got to at least give him a draft and some kids to work with - regardless of any 'points scoring' or bickering that might be going on, he needs more time.

We don't ditch the under performing draftees after half a year languishing in the reserves.

Happy to allow Neeld his full three years to not only instigate change, but affect it.

I will abstain from voting because until some drastic changes are made higher up he has Buckley's chance of proving anything.

I will abstain from voting because until some drastic changes are made higher up he has Buckley's chance of proving anything.

How does that stop you from either wanting him there or not ? Are you not in effect saying he needs time to prove something ? You think that will/would or could happen in the short time left thi sseason.Almost by default yours is a vote for keeping.

What changes, weve a whole new FD ffs. Things take time.

What if we can replace him with Roos or malthouse?

Would our club be better off?

Watched On The Couch last night. Roos labelled the MFC as irrelevant, and I immediately thought to myself 'who's the dude on Demonland who keeps saying rather mindlessly - "get Roos" - like we could even if we wanted to?'

Well thanks for reminding me tonatopia.

I have one simple question for you: Do you still believe in the tooth fairy?

Some people in Kansas actually think the earth is 6,000 years old and that dinosaurs didn't exist because they weren't mentioned in the Bible.

It's hard to convince them the earth is in fact about 4.54 billion years old and that the universe is now estimated to have been created about 13.7 billion years ago.

Time for you to get real. Malthouse and Roos don't want to coach this club. They will effectively select the club they wish to coach if they want another senior gig - and, cop a tip, it's not ours.

And it never has been.

What if we can replace him with Roos or malthouse?

Would our club be better off?

Since you are basing your argument on what if's I'll join. What if we had Malthouse instead of Neeld? If we had the same amount of wins under malthouse this year no one would be questioning him because he has runs on the board. Every one would be waiting for the list to be culled at the end of the year. A bad list is a bad list. Simple.