Everything posted by Sydee
-
CASEY DEMONS V RICHMOND VFL
I certainly wasn't saying he is ready nor was I suggesting he should be an automatic selection in the senior side - far from it However, I do see potential and I do think he has more chance to succeed than some others Only time will tell - what I will say is that I have seen enough of Charlie to know he won't die wondering
-
CASEY DEMONS V RICHMOND VFL
I think that's a bit simplistic - Do you remember a guy called Greg Williams? 3cm taller, arguably slower but very very handy player I'm not saying Charlie is the next Greg Williams but his skills are good and he usually creates opportunities with possession. His challenge is to build a bigger tank, get stronger and to run all day and get the ball more often. These are not going to come easily so he has work ahead but from the little, I have seen he certainly does not lack the desire for success The coaching staff obviously see potential I think in two years time we will know if he's going to make it or not - too early to write him off IMO
-
CASEY DEMONS V RICHMOND VFL
Petty I think can make it in time - but probably needs exactly that - time. It's a bit weird though that some people are happy to let Weideman learn to be a footballer taking space up in the ones but not Petty who in my mind would most likely contribute just as much Bit harsh on Spargo - he does need to build an engine and play midfield rather than undersized small forward Chandler I have not seen so can't comment Concur on the others
-
CASEY DEMONS V RICHMOND VFL
They match up well against the opposition though
-
CASEY DEMONS V RICHMOND VFL
Can you keep a close eye on Oskar Baker too please - more likely to crack a game before any of the last 3 you mention IMO thx
- POST GAME: Rd 06 vs Richmond
-
CHANGES: Rd 07 vs Hawthorn
Why do they need to be played at all if they contribute nothing - why is Weideman gifted games when people cry out for others who contribute just as much to be dumped The guy is a protected species - we are so devoid of list depth we continue to have to cling onto the hope that he will turn the corner and become an AFL player - well guess what there are no guarantees it will ever happen - meanwhile we play one short each week while he racks up games Does anyone really think that West Coast, Collingwood or Richmond would continually gift games to players that don't contribute week after week - NO is the answer Not sure about you but I'm not sure there is any morale left to lose - and I don't see playing guys week after week that contribute zero is great for team morale either
-
Sack everyone (mega-thread)
Leaving at a very low point - hardly great timing
-
Sam Weideman + contract
Well, they certainly won't be rating him one little bit on his form this year - breakout game coming up from him against the Hawks perhaps
-
Sam Weideman + contract
My comment was in response to your statement below "last year he was a good third tall when we had Hogan. He struggles as a first or second tall and played above his ability in the finals, as Did Tmac. " I was not a fan of the Hogan trade and like many are totally underwhelmed by what May brings to the table - hope I'm proved wrong in time - not sure I believe people can play "above themselves" btw - you can play or you can't - no doubt you can play below your ability and we have the majority of our team firmly in that camp atm You said he was a good third tall when we had Hogan - the reality is that his only two AFL games where he looked like he could potentially make it as a player Hogan was in the stands and it was him and TMac as the talls - stuffed if I know how we won either of those games now based on what we are seeing week to week
-
Sam Weideman + contract
Hogan was sitting in the stands for those two finals texting his mates in Perth from memory
-
Sam Weideman + contract
Huh ? He's the third tall in ability who are the other two ? Pretty sure at the start of the season he was being touted as our second key tall behind TMac - we all know how successful that's been for us He got lucky in two finals and everyone instantly thinks he's a champion in the making - before those games his body of work was incredibly underwhelming and that form line continues into this season Please don't say Preuss is our future as a tall forward target the guy is playing there because he doesn't have the ability or the fitness to ruck a large portion of the game plus our other so-called tall forwards have been a complete waste of space so far this year
-
Sam Weideman + contract
I find it amazing that any of our so-called footballers would call for a trade at the end of the year based on the team performing like crud - aren't they all individually and collectively responsible for their cr@p performances If this is the reason they want out I say F%^k off out we don't won't pathetic excuse makers anymore at MFC - what we do want is people who can actually perform gameday - Sam is certainly not going close to ticking that box irrespective of the less than perfect delivery inside 50 Time for Sam and many others to prove why they deserve to be an AFL list at all not just ours
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Haven't seen any accountability around here lately - don't hold your breath
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 06 vs Richmond
we are hard as nails - WTF? can't even get through the warm-up
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 06 vs Richmond
The ferrals can smell an easy kill and have come in numbers
-
PREGAME: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Hey BBO fantastic effort to be so optimistic I almost felt a glimmer of hope - then looked at their forward 6 and our back 6 again and felt rather ill
-
Tim Smith - Virtual Player?
Not comforting that we are bringing in our big guns in the hour of need
-
PREGAME: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Blew the cobwebs off - Should be lightning quick after a 4-day turnaround
-
PREGAME: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Looking at their forward line vs our named back 6 (excluding Salem who can play) this could get incredibly ugly
-
Questions that need to be answered.
I hope Sg and the whole team sit down and watch Jimmy Bartels summary of where things are going wrong in Access all Areas. To be honest, never watch them and only did because I was interested in the highlights of McKay - oh how I wish Weideman was showing as much promise Anyway I think these guys nailed it As a collective team we simply allow opposition players too much space and basically hope somehow to win back possession and then get the easy possession on the turnover - teams with half decent skills have worked it out and cut us to ribbons - North play a similar game style and are cr@p too. We need to try manning up a lot closer and stop playing zone defence because it just isn't working The other points highlighted were that we constantly commit too many numbers around a contest and then when the ball gets free the opposition have players free and away they go Our forward fifty entries are abysmal - high kicks sitting on top of our taller forwards heads which make it dead easy to spoil - worse is that fact we don't have crumbers and invariably the opposition do and clear the ball far too easily - this is shown up week after week by our disproportionate inside 50 count but terrible conversion rate Until we start dealing with these issues we are in for some ugly defeats These are the reasons we are dead easy to play against and it needs to stop now !
-
PREGAME: Rd 06 vs Richmond
Lest we forget 2019
-
Questions that need to be answered.
Don't hold your breath - according to SG "our brand" is still perfectly fine we are just too easy to play against atm - well that isn't good is it ! I agree we are pedestrian in the speed department, generally have poor skills which get highlighted more in the wet and not a single forward that opposition backs would be concerned about kicking multiple goals
-
2020 starts now ?
No
-
Sack everyone (mega-thread)
He’s gonna love the game this week