Jump to content

Discussion on recent allegations about the use of illicit drugs in football is forbidden

Eittocs12

Members
  • Posts

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Eittocs12

  • Birthday 01/03/1982

Previous Fields

  • Favourite Player(s)
    Bennett, Jackovich, M Febey, Sylvia, N. Jones

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Melbourne

Recent Profile Visitors

2,903 profile views

Eittocs12's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (1/10)

32

Reputation

  1. I'd like to be in it again I was in the Stynes league last year Eittocs12 / Dodge City Dealers
  2. Total Games Ave games Round 1 1382 62.82 Round 2 1615 73.41 Round 3 1490 67.73 Round 4 1384 62.91 Round 5 1653 75.14 Round 6 1651 75.05 Round 7 1399 63.59 Round 8 1410 64.09 Round 9 1273 57.86 Round 10 1406 63.91 Round 11 1412 64.18
  3. Had to turn it off after 5 mins of listen to Heppell and Robbo gushing over every word he said. Ridiculous that they now have a regular panel member that is serving a drug ban. He should not be anywhere near AFL or media while serving a ban. I won't be watching the show this year.
  4. I'm keen to go again I debuted this year in the 'R. Barrasi' League, and came runner up. Total Score for the year was 49,554 Happy to go into what ever league available
  5. Team name - Terlichmyballs R Barassi League
  6. JKH and Nev Jetta make final squad for tomorrow eagles Vs All-stars game. Looking forward to see how JKH goes
  7. The O'Rourke trade is the equivalent of our trade last year with Pick 2, 20 & 53 for Tyson and 9. If you compare the 2 trades means we paid pick 2, 53 for pick 9 and would have got Tyson with pick 20. I liked our trade last year but this trade is massively in favour of Hawthorn. Yet another instance of a big club getting a great deal at the expense of a smaller club
  8. He has had multiple soft tissue injuries this year. Good in and under but not great disposal, tends to just bomb it forward Lost a step maybe 2, who knows if he slows up even more over the off-season I'm happy with Crossy but can't have too many of the same type in the team, I think we should pass on him
  9. Out Pedersen (broken Nose) Tapscott(Knee, not on injury report but 2nd time he has hobbled off in 2 games) Terlich (Poor decisions/disposals from back line) McKenzie (if you're a tagger and don't stop your player and also miss goal from 12m out, what good are you?) In Cross (one of the few professional footballers on our list) Gawn (Dominating VFL ruckman) Strauss (based on VFL player reports has been in best over the last 3-4 games) Michie (Same as Strauss) I would like to see Salem come in but he has not been playing well at VFL level, probably getting tired in his first season, Roos has not been rewarding average VFL games with AFL games. Blease to be the sub as he didn't have a great game but he was playing mainly half forward and the ball was butchered when players tried to get him the ball on the outside to use his speed. Watts also very lucky to stay after another poor effort
  10. AFL website reporting jarred Knee, 1-2 weeks
  11. Sorry I had to vent somewhere after reading this article. http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/dees-fall-short-of-priority-pick-20130912-2tnkf.html We can add Josh Elliot from the age with Barrett taking up the fight for the other teams against Melbourne to get a Priority pick. It would be nice if the information they used to support their case was actually factual. "Blease showed promise in his first two years, but was poor in 2013, playing just 10 games and averaging only 31 fantasy points a game." As most people know Blease broke his leg and didn't play a game until Round 15 of his 3rd season on our list. He goes on to mention T$ jumping ship with no mention of the fact he mainly went as they made him the highest paid play in the league.(Mind you it worked out well for us...Hogan & Barry). Carlon's priority picks are mentioned but he fails to take note that carlton's priority picks were picks 2, pick 1, pick 1 and Pick 17. but does mention our priorty pick history with picks 3, pick 17 and pick 1. Of course he only mentions names and not where these picks were. He finishes the aritcle by saying the standard of these players doesn't support melbournes case for a priorty pick. It's not hard to understand that it is not the standard of the players but the overall standard of the TEAM that should be the determination weather Melbourne should receive a priority pick. It would be nice if there was some balanced reporting on the topic.
  12. No Thanks, We can get a pretty good Mid for 600K and we need mids to get the ball in the forward 50. Who knows, if we could get the ball in the forward 50 we might find that one of the players on our list might be able to play small forward
×
×
  • Create New...