Curry & Beer

I disagree with Clark in the ruck.. I think some have forgotten just how good he is at FF - before getting injured he had the 7th best goal per game average in the comp, and that's in an awful side with low quality and quantity of inside 50s. A full season at FF with some better midfield performances he could well give the coleman a shake

actually rfpc is the one who said 400%, referring to 8 wins improvement to last year's 2 wins. interesting that rfpc 'likes' your post, demonstrates the grip he has on his own statement

one thing for sure is that we are all going to enjoy footy matches a lot more next year, when we get it inside 50 there will actually be some talent sitting under it instead of kicking it to absolutely nobody as we have gotten used to seeing. BRING IT ON

http://daycalc.appspot.com/02/12/2014 thats nab cup

15 wins x 400% = 60 wins that's how percentages work it's your application of them that is dense

I expect a big improvement in the Tigers next year, about 400%, so that will take them to 60 wins

it's maths for dummies

I didn't say 'minimum'. We are going to have a good 8 changes to our regular side last year, in some very important spots and we have the genuine article coach instead of a complete hack.. last year's output is almost irrelevant. Last year we lost a good 10 matches because we switched off for a quarter but matched our opponent for the other 3. That's the big one for me. also.. calling it 400% is a bit silly. An increase of 6 to 12 wins is also 6 more wins but an increase of 100%. 12 to 18 wins is 50%. It's not an applicable unit of measurement is it?

GWS/GC/bris/saints/dogs = 7 wins + 1 for WCE at the G surely you are not so jaded that seems out of the question ffs

I really think we'll get 8-10 wins There are a couple of absolutely critical areas we should see a big boost in

urgh Dwayne Russel

obviously the comments he made on radio are just like every other public comment you hear from every other player/coach/admin: useless platitudes in no way necessarily aligned with the truth, spouted out to paint a positive picture of the club for the members to hear.. how is that surprising to any of you at this point

I think your memory is letting you down a bit there.. we trailed by 4 points at half time

they really do get creative in ways to slam us don't they? if we hadn't just delisted him would they even have a clue who James Magner is? the bloke couldnt get a game in the worst midfield of all time and has just gone further backwards in the pecking order with five new midfielders coming to the club. Obviously he has hit his ceiling and is not getting any better. why in the name of God would we keep Magner on the list? As depth? We would need to have about 10 midfielders injured at once for him to make the side FFS the media has really lost the plot.. pack of bottom-feeding scumbags the lot of them

astute observation

It is good in that respect We are a sneaky chance to be up 4-1 for mine

14 for Collingwood Money talks Infuriating *12 for Richmond

That's what happens when you lose - anybody can look back at the past and choose anything they like and say it was a mistake

girl there's a better life for you and me

can somebody (mods) do something about this garbage please we don't come here to read extreme political agendas, find another forum

lies played 61 games in 10/11/12 and how much footy are you supposed to play in your first two years anyway, was he even injured or just developing in the twos? show some respect to your fellow posters and do your homework

I reckon we are a big chance to pull something out of the bag on the final day, they've already shown they are not effing round this time

4 injuries in under a year is not good. That doesn't mean anybody is blame, it's just really not good.

it is a stinker pick4 straight to nothing goes close