Little Goffy

What we need here is one of those fire-fighting helicopters, and approximately 10,000 litres of milk.

Oh! Useful public service announcement! I found the rule on father-son selections for the rookie draft. Medium story short - if a F/S eligible player isn't bid on in the draft, then they can be automatically selected as a rookie before the rookie draft even takes place. FATHER-SON – ROOKIE PRE-SELECTION The Father-Son Rule previously applied to players selected at the National Draft. Under the rule, other AFL clubs can bid for eligible players who have been nominated under the Father-Son Rule by an eligible club. The nominating club can select the eligible player by forfeiting its next available pick in the draft if a bid has been made by another club. If there is no bid from another club, the nominating club forfeits its last pick in the National Draft. A club can pre-select an eligible player as a Category A rookie between the Pre-Season and Rookie Drafts (with the player’s consent) provided the player had nominated for but was not selected by another club at either the National or Pre-Season Drafts. In that case, the relevant club would forfeit its last available selection in the Rookie Draft to take the player.

Not a zero chance that we do a slight split of our picks, trading up and down, and Taylor selects Taylor and Taylor. I'm also still hopeful on a full Sam deck. I think my most preferred players are Xavier Taylor, Sam Cumming if either or both are still available at our picks, but if only one (or neither) of them is available I'd be very happy to trade a little bit down the order a bit and hope to collect Latrelle Pickett and Blake Thredgold. It would be a bonus if Josh Lindsay or Cameron Nairn slipped that far. I wouldn't even mind Schubert if we could get him later in the first round. There's actually a wealth of tall prospects at end end of the first round / early second round. Then our boy Kalani, and it really seems like Sinnema is headed for us via the rookie draft.

The spot-betting opportunities would be massive. Laying on a multi for 'Jeremy Cameron, as a bumblebee, kicking a goal on the 2/7th time siren.'

You'll be pleased to know this has even been systematically studied. Simple scenario. Groups of observers were brought in to watch a set up quiz show. Afterwards they were asked to rate in order who were the most intelligent people on stage, and almost invariably they chose the quiz master. This applied even though for each new observer group there was a change of who the quiz master and contestents were and even the arrangements of which contestants were getting the right answers. Conclusion; after 47 quizzes, we all probably think @Demonstone is much, much smarter than he really is.

If we can put ourselves ahead of North even a bit and then hammer in with the pressure and make everything difficult, there's a real chance they crack. "There is no moment of peril greater than when apparent triumph is turned to sudden terror."

Ahh, it's time to start working on the team of players all delisted with a year left to run on their contract. Maintain the rage!

I'm thinking, alright? I used up all my brainjuice on the dozen guesses at the quiz. Might go for the basic taunt, something like just the counter of 'Days since Essendon won a final', or a list of our players who weren't yet born at the time Essendon won a final. Or maybe my personal football catchphrase, "Collingwood is a liability to Australian Football." Or something intellectual but menacing sounding, harking back to the burst of latin earlier, and also a famous catchphrase, "Hawthorn delenda est". But none of that is especially creative. My only really creative effort with football taunts is a totally unusable rework of the Western Bulldogs song; "Sons of incest". Fortunately only fragments remain in memory.

We've done it. We've finally reached a moment of women's football triumph so intense Ghosty is too absorbed in the moment to post on here.

I've got it! Their photos all produce wild AI hallucinations which completely misidentify them!

Acknowledging the point that Steele has for a few seasons been well down on his terrific 2020-24 peak, I'd point to the brighter side that his clearance and tackle count have stayed stable. He also has surprisingly good disposal efficiency and low turnover count consider the often contested space he works in. If he is played realistically to the role he is best for and which we most need him for - the hard working, defense oriented inside mid - then we will get great service from him and it'll be of disproportionate value for our younger and mostly lighter-bodied mids. Steele was truly great a few years ago and can be very good for a few more years yet. That's well ahead of both Didley and Billings!

I do wonder, on how many club's forums there would be threads that prompt me to read Jabberwocky?

I'm sorry to hear about your unpleasant medical condition. Have to tried eating fertilised sparrow eggs? Does all this make 2026 or 2025 anno rex primum? Oh noooooo, it's the millenial date debate all over again!

"Carpe diem, Illud virum pulchrum nunc amplecti debeo."

Unacceptable. Shares a surname with my high school best friend. Also his ridiculously attractive sister. The sister might be more the issue, actually. I would feel genuinely uncomfortable. That said... when Adelaide or Carlton comes knocking for one of our early picks to get Sharp or to get ahead of the Dean pick, the list of possible options for the slightly downgraded pick seems to be continually growing.

Quite right - my bad. I guess a better description is 'marking' winger, in so far as he can take marks on leads and can jump ridonkulously for them too. Of course, my Sam still hasn't cracked 70cm so they all seem pretty tall to me.

Really excellent set. I normally stop clicking through after a few from these but I got to the end and even recognised Jared Rivers, despite his face shifting shape a lot since... what, 2010? Meanwhile, the Nathan Jones Academy of Getting Gradually Better Looking As You Age remains in business.

I mean... A speedy line breaker who can also get into the packs happily when it is his turn to go, a powerful 'high impact' midfielder-forward with more pace than you'd expect, and a super-athletic tall winger with a bit of development to be done. We could do worse. I guess this means Kalani White is the baked beans?

afl.com.au'Don't stop': Midfield jet adds new string to his bow to...South Australian prospect Dyson Sharp is one of the best pure midfielders in the draft Long write up on the AFL website. Seems like the proverbial nice young man. The article is obviously setting out to moderate perceptions of Sharp being limited in the roles he can play. Maybe I'm a sucker, but I am reassured. There's always a need for at least a coupke of players who can dominate in the packs, and within a few seasons he could be our only one on hand! I still think we should prioritise Sams. At least one Sam every season.

So, uh, is Steele injured or just not someone Fox is aware of? Other than that, the logic is simple enough and Sharp is a genuine possibility who I'd be happy for us to get. We definitely need a succession line for the inside mids.

Literally the least broken aspect of the game. FIXED!

What safest thou on the manners and lordly qualities of yonder Zak, scion of the Butterses? We're in an awkward situation where we seem to have a great many young players with good character and leadership potential, but none who explicitly stand out as 'next captain'. It might be very, very interesting to see who emerges with new boldness as player and leader without the two 'awkward' champions filling the status. I'm cautiously optimistic that a leader will rise, but would not make any predictions with confidence.

Perennially stranded in Sydney. I think I'm more annoyed at not being able to be part of the emergence of the women's game than even about missing the men's season. This is a time which will have future medals and trophies named after it!

What, no Mason Cox?

Sorry I didn't include you in the team, Mr Reddan-A'Blew! The 'why' is related to a moment of folklore where 191/192cm players seemed to be cursed for a number of drafts, lead by Matthew Bate, Lydnen Dunn, Colin Garland and Cale Morton - most of them began at 191 and progressed to 192cm during their career, but there was a debate at the time about whether these players would be tall enough to be key targets, or too tall to be mobile players. This was back in the era where '4-2-6' became a MFCSS trigger and Juice Newton was being given one more chance every single year. The 'how' was pretty simple and actually came before the 'why' in a way - I was bumming around on AFL Tables and noticed you could sort players in each team by height. Sure enough, 191cm players tended to include a very short list of absolute guns and then a disproportionate number of never-quite players, giving me the confirmation bias I craved. Oh, and @beelzebub, you're quite right some sources have Neitz as a little taller, presumably measured before going bald? But footywire, AFLTables and his retirement announcement (made post-baldness, of course) https://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/85783/champion-david-neitz-retires all had him at 191cm, which is why is he was in the team but also noted as being one of the 'disputable' entries. @Ghostwriter Taylor Walker was 190cm at draft and is now 192cm, so at some point he was in between.