Jump to content

Demon Disciple

Life Member
  • Posts

    10,093
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Demon Disciple

  1. Not your problem, so don't worry about it. With Taylor now in charge as opposed to that imposter Pretendergast, i will put my faith in whoever we pick at 3 because we have clearly had that kid ear-marked. Pick 10 is the more interesting one.
  2. I just hope Weideman is around at pick 10
  3. I'd advise on having a shower before doing anything else.
  4. They did manage to pull our pants down this year though, didn't they
  5. Umm, no he's not http://www.afl.com.au/news/2015-05-13/whos-up-for-grabs-the-preliminary-list-of-2016-free-agents-
  6. The question is though, had we drafted Ollie Wines instead, would've he gone on to become the player he is now? He would've been better than Toumpas no doubt, but probably not as good as he has become.
  7. Not really, SOS is just bringing the rejects he recruited down to the Blues to further continue their ineptness.
  8. Well it would probably leave Weideman for us to draft. He could be the one to help out Hogan. All is not lost, we'll get a decent kid at pick 6. One of Francis, Parish, Curnow or Weideman. I would be more [censored] if we had pick 7 and all those kids had already been selected.
  9. Agree. In the games i have seen him play, he's done nothing to suggest that he will become a good AFL player, let alone a great/star player. Overrated (probably why Carlton are interested in him)
  10. Gone a bit early there Biff.
  11. Assuming Weitering and Schache go 1 & 2, at least one of Francis, Parish, Curnow or Weideman will be available come pick 6 (or the 6th live pick).
  12. I think mo is looking for reliable support. I'd have Dawes in that spot just as much as the one's you have listed.
  13. As the KPF to help support Hogan, he would be the one i'd bring in. However, Injuries are a concern. As you've pointed out he has been hit by a fair few of them. It also makes him more of a speculative pick. I would've looked to have gained another pick inside the top 10 (easier said than done - i know), so we could have picked up both Curnow and Weideman, as opposed to trying to go all in to get GCS pick 3 for Parish (who i am very lukewarm on).
  14. I love how Roos stated that we'll be aggressive in the trade period, yet 9 days down with only 2 to go (more like 1.5), we've brought in Melksham and Kennedy. We also seem to be sitting back waiting for other things to transpire before we engage trading again. Very aggressive indeed!!!
  15. Curnow is only 191cm. Not KPP height, plus he will be probably transitioned into a big bodied-midfielder.
  16. Can you blame Mahoney & Co after the way he and his manager treated us with such contempt?
  17. That's what GWS initially offered, which we sensibly declined
  18. With bringing in the likes of Melksham, Kennedy and probably Bugg, including having Petracca and Trengove back in the picture, would anyone be upset if we reached for Weideman come draft time? Clearly Weitering and Schache will be gone, Parish probably too come our first pick. The last time we reached for a KPF was Cook, do we dare reach again?
  19. Apart from pick 8, the next pick gws have is pick 27. Not much point in doing that
  20. And yet we still have the likes of Spencer, Jones and Terlich on our list
  21. I have no gripes with Toump, he wasn't a lazy pr!ck demanding way too much cash then turning around and screwing us over with the GC deal. Howe on the other hand....................i wouldn't bat an eye-lid if he fell off the face of the Earth.
  22. No, that's not how it works rpfc!
  23. Careful Bing, you being way too logical for a place like this
×
×
  • Create New...