Cheap Seats

Haha just conversation not jumping on that one. I'll put my house on it that the really good teams players played out of position. And they did it well. And guess what that's why they were a good team.

Fair call. While we need depth you're also asking an 18 yo whos had 0 pre seasons to hold down a position and or stop an opponent. It's a tough call because we need depth but have depth where we dont need it. Whats even worse is there is no versatility in the players we have. For example you cant throw Viney or Brayshaw in a forward pocket... we just dont have the quality in depth. Would love some more run and ground ball winners. A half decent rebounding defender would be nice as well.

Who does he replace?

Its a good call. I have been thinking in a similar vein. When do we stop playing guys who the game has gone past and give blokes who'll get the job done a go? It's actually a tougher call then you think because effectively you're telling T Mac (as per your example) his career is over.

Midfield beaten Forwards couldn't execute. Cant bring that weak stuff against good sides.

I don't know what his role is exactly at the moment (seems to be some type of stopper in the back 6), which has helped free up May/Lever. Not getting much love but I think hes done a decent job since coming back in. Will be interesting to watch how he is used going forward.

Yup, I can relate to that as well. Regardless of how the rules are interpreted was nice to be on the favourable end of the umpiring decisions this week.

Yes sir! Apologies for having an opinion.

That guy is a mad man. You'd love playing with him 100% commitment and would put fear in to the opposition.

You know it's your night when viney is hittijg forwards lace out

Im in the trade brayshaw camp but he's not the gun people make him out to be.

2018 was a little while ago now, im pretty sure a good player would be more consistent. The only stat im interested in for our mids is score involvements. As exciting as your stats are it hasnt changed my mind. This afternoon is his first opportunity to change it.

He is a mid. A slow poor disposal mid who hasn't got a tank yet. Im not saying give up on him but he's no where near a complete player. Until he can do something against good sides i still think hes over rated. But hes not alone.

Would love both. Happy with either both bring something we lack.

While i agree we haven't achieved anything yet... Lighten up ppl. Enjoy the ride

Fair points. I don't know the context which the nick name was used. I just want to make sure we aren't jumping down people throats for no reason. Good show carry on.

All good mate. I am completely lost with what is going on here but please continue.

You're so far off the mark i shouldn't even reply but please continue ranting it's entertaining.

Haha i love the irony. You're offended at what i said - which is true by the way - no one (except the government through laws) dictate what is acceptable language. Yet you think you can insult me because yo disagree with me. Thanks for the laughs

Who cares. Since when are nick names that aren't offsensive hate speech? Is it going to be offensive now to call Jack Watts - Wattsy because that isn't his real name? What a load of rubbish

Nick names and shortening of names have been acceptable language for a long time. It wasn't offensive use of his name - Get off your high horse The rest i agree with

Good call (Although i do like Rivers) I think we just missed out on Dursma as well

I was really happy to see us keep another team to 5 goals. Good signs. Oliver took big steps again in the right direction. Offense still needs a lot of work, but it is getting better. Do it in the big games now

Don't bag the umpires Mr Mac, Gil and his cohorts will be after you.

Dont watch it then. Oh wait it's demonland my bad