beelzebub

can it be them

marketing to whom ?

CD would be taken their first defender currently. Change this and output will also

Again you can do all of this without actually being there

Im not sure what any of that has to do with anything. Its been suggested apparently that a tie in with Melb Uni helps denote some connect of the MFC with this city. Im sorry I just cant see how that works. if you want to build a brand you do it with relevance and marketing. Not by setting up at the Uni

Its it carltons area for the simple reason it is.

Anyone thinking that being at the Uni will suddenly cough up 1000's of supporters is crazy. It wont build the brand in my mind it will confuse it.. Melbourne Uni Footy Club ?? What can be done there that cant be done by not being there ? A tie up with the Learning Institution and closer ties or whatever by all means but I really see no advantage at all there. Its actually FURTHER from the CBD and heart of the game than we are presently and less access to transport. Cant say Im a fan of this at all.

or just redevelop Goschs ? Its already the sporting district Money has to be spent where ever its done. Why not do a Collingwood ? Again..its arguing a la Devil

Being devils advocate here how it that central. ?? Nearest PT is TRAM...as opposed Richmond Station. I can see the so called pluses but some of the supposed foundation of this move makes no sense, given the premise of greater connect to the CBD etc. Whatever benefits a tie in to Melb Uni might offer could surely still be accessed where-ever you may be, after all is that exactly what students and other businesses do ?

oh...i see what you did then !!!

How is Parkville the CBD ? just curious A presence in the CBD can be accomplished without moving to the other side of it

Lets see Move from state of the art facilities and proximity to our Heart ( the G ) to become poor neighbours to Carlton yeah...right Pigs.Arrrrrrse !!!

Actually a point , if rolling the dice isnt a poor result as it gives you possession and then its up to you

Didnt watch so can only take it from this that it was quite interesting ..lol I essentially agree with Lyon in so much as to Chips qualities. Any side reference to other 'things" ...who knows. Some aspects though, for consideration. It is hardly Chips first game in defence. Secondly as a gun fwd in his day Lyon would be only too aware of how important a good defender is. Chip is not a first or even 5th year player. He's a well seasoned member of the Dees. He oughtnt be "learning" anything as opposed to refining some aspects.

patience...... hmmmm patience..... its not really about patience. its (to me) about appropriateness. ......relevance Whence comes the time can we ask a simple question.. can he play footy well ? No cuteness about outside inside , skills, eliteness or such. I want footy players at Melb, Its an old time ideal i imagine but its about inherent smarts on the filed. not about body, about beep, its about a guy understanding the game and playing as such.

where do you think we are at this fledgling stage ?

doesnt need to be Chip...but get the gist

I agree. Was it all just well thought through cleverness ?? or good fortune We've switched on early , it seems. We wont get free slather for much longer

No...ive sitting over here....with the others. Will he take the hook ( PR) I think he will

Mr Rossignol asks to explain

I think youve missed my gist. Jack has amazing talent but seems affraid to own it., Nik Nat isnt JW needs to

Hey Daisy...any reason I cant PM you ?

Would love CD to remain a Dee and see out his career as one of us can we have about 6 more of him ?

just saying Nik Nat has taken a few games by their scruff and changed them Id love Jack to do so......and I reckon he could...between the ears !!